By:  Timothy Sutton, Communications Editor

Today, recruiters, human resource managers, and small business owners utilize the Internet to recruit new employees. Online recruiting is cheap, efficient, and reaches a much broader audience than traditional forms of media. While there are numerous advantages to employing a professional staffing agency to locate prospective employees through the Internet, many employers choose to self-publish want ads through popular websites like monster.com or craiglist.org. Self-publishing online job posting gives the employer complete control over when, where, and how long a post will be visible to the public. Ultimately, do-it-yourself recruiting can be personally tailored to suit a particular employer’s needs.

But recruiters beware. The Internet is much more sophisticated than a virtual corkboard. Keywords and phrases in your job listings can be tracked and monitored by government software, then stored in databases. Recently, the Civil Rights Division of the Office of Special Counsel (OSC) released a Best Practices notice for online job posting. Whether this notice foreshadows future litigation over civil rights violations in hiring practices is yet to be determined; regardless, the message is clear, employers need to exercise caution when recruiting online because the OSC is monitoring online want ads.

Immigration laws prohibit the use of discriminatory language regarding U.S. Citizenship, lawful permanent residence, citizenship status, or national origin unless required by law, regulation or executive order. Curiously, the OSC notice was released shortly after a handful of states attempted to curtail the rights of Deferred Action Childhood Arrival qualifiers to obtain state identification (see our previous post here). There is no data revealing any increase in discriminatory language found in online job postings, but a simple keyword search on either monster.com or craigslist.org reveals numerous non-compliant ads. For instance, if the word “citizen” is entered into Craigslist, ads for dishwashers, personal assistants, security guards, and caregivers pop up. Each ad contains some version of the following discriminatory language that the OSC notice clearly forbids pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act at § 1324b that prohibits discrimination based on the citizenship status or national origin in the hiring, firing unfair document practices (“document abuse”) during employment eligibility verification process, and retaliation:

•  “Only U.S. Citizens”
• “Citizenship requirement”*
• “Only U.S. Citizens or Green Card Holders”
• “H-1Bs Only”
• “Must have a U.S. Passport”
• “Must have a green card”

One explanation presented by the OSC for the common use of such language is the misinterpretation of federal employment laws. Employers are not limited to the recruitment of U.S. citizens. In fact, we recently published an article on the proper method of verifying the legal employment status of refugee/asylees. Due to the complexity of adhering to the legal requirements of recruiting, hiring, and employing individuals in today’s diverse workplace, employers should seek the professional guidance of an attorney. The cost savings and convenience of self-publishing job postings are heavily outweighed by the potential financial penalties and negative publicity of losing an anti-discrimination lawsuit.

Our office has the experience and successful track record necessary to protect the interests of your enterprise.  For more information, contact one of our immigration professionals at info@immigrationcompliancegroup.com or call 562 612.3996.

With H-1B filing season upon us as of April 2, 2012, we take this opportunity to remind you that although there has been slow but steady economic recovery over the last few years, the H-1B cap is expected to be reached much faster this year.  This, coupled with a recent NFAP Policy Report Analysis released this month citing case denial rates of 17% with a staggering RFE (Request for Evidence) rate of 36%, sends a clear, “culture of no” message that USCIS is making it more difficult for skilled foreign nationals to work in the USA with increasing denial rates for both the H-1B and L-1 visa programs.  All the more reason to be relying on experienced business immigration council for your case filings.

The NFAP report states, “Employers report the time lost due to the increase in denials and Requests for Evidence are costing them millions of dollars in project delays and contract penalties, while aiding competitors that operate exclusively outside the United States beyond the reach of USCIS adjudicators and U.S. consular officers.”

Small to medium-size companies and IT consultants and staffing agencies often bear the burden of these overbearing RFE’s.  Working with smart immigration practitioners and preparing your case strategy in advance to address both your strengths and weaknesses, will pay off greatly.  Here are some tips that we highly recommend be incorporated in your filings:

1)     Incorporate a detailed brochure and description of the employer’s products or services and why you require a professional with a bachelor’s degree to perform the offered position.  Include promotional materials, press releases or news articles to illustrate the nature of the business, new trends and growth factors in your business that substantiate the offered position.

2)     Include a copy of your corporate tax return or financial statements to evidence profit and business stablity

3)     Explain in detail why the position cannot be performed by an employee without a bachelor’s degree; i.e. is it standard in your industry?  Provide detail (such as examples of work to be done) concerning the complexity of the position

4)     Provide a real, detailed job description with the percentage of time spent on the duties of the position, the qualifications and special skills required to perform the job.  Further explain any discretionary judgment that the employee will have in their job and other such areas of responsibility that are demanding or highly advanced

5)     Provide evidence that you have a current and past practice of hiring bachelor’s degree employees for the subject position

6)     IT and staffing agencies must be prepared to evidence the “employer-employee relationship” in H-1B offsite placement work situations by clearly evidencing the employer’s ability to “hire, pay, fire, supervise, or otherwise control the work of the employee. (based upon the January 8, 2010 Neufeld Memorandum).

If you’d like to set up a time to discuss your case with our office or to engage our services, please feel free to contact us.

ICE and HSI worksite enforcement activities strike again – this time it’s temp agencies!

In an ICE Press Release today, it was announced that during an ICE and HSI investigation, it was found that a 2-location temp agency was knowingly supplying undocumented unskilled and skilled warehouse and janitorial workers to their clients as a part of their labor pool.

Clinton Roy Perkins, the owner of Can Do It Inc. in Bensenville, IL, was sentenced on February 16th to 18 months in prison, to be followed by three years of supervised release, for knowingly hiring illegal aliens at the staffing companies. He pleaded guilty in September 2010. On Feb. 25th, U.S. District Judge Joan B. Gottschall also ordered the forfeiture of $465,178 in proceeds obtained as a result of the criminal activity.

Perkins admitted to knowingly hiring more than 10 illegal aliens from Mexico between October 2006 and October 2007.  Perkins did not require the workers to provide documents establishing their immigration status or lawful right to work in the United States.

Perkins and his son-in-law, Chrispher Reindl, paid the illegal workers’ wages in cash; did not deduct payroll taxes or other withholdings. Perkins and Reindl directed low-level supervisory employees to transport illegal workers back and forth between locations near the aliens’ residences in Chicago and work sites in the suburbs. Both also provided bogus six-digit numbers – purporting to be the last six digits of the aliens’ Social Security numbers – to a company, knowing that their workers were in the country illegally and did not possess valid Social Security numbers.

In a quote from special agent in charge of ICE HSI in Chicago:  “We will hold employers accountable for their actions.  Mr. Perkins knowingly hired an illegal workforce and circumvented our nation’s immigration laws for financial gain. The goal of our enforcement efforts is two-fold – reduce the demand for illegal employment and protect job opportunities for the nation’s lawful workforce.”

ICE was assisted in the investigation by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Inspector General in Chicago. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Christopher R. McFadden and Daniel May, Northern District of Illinois, prosecuted the case.

President Barack Obama on Friday signed a bill directing $600 million more to securing the U.S.-Mexico border, a modest election-year victory that underscores his failure so far to deliver an overhaul of immigration law from Congress.

Obama signed the bill Friday in a low-key Oval Office ceremony alongside Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano. There were cameras present, but no reporters. The action came a day after the Senate convened in special session during its summer recess to pass the bill.

“Look, only Congress can pass a bill,” Napolitano said. “The president can advocate. He can get them to the table, as he has in the Roosevelt Room upstairs. He can implore. He can provide ideas. He can agree to a framework, as he already has. He can give a major address that spells out what’s needed in a bill, but only Congress can pass a bill.”

The new law will pay for the hiring of 1,000 more Border Patrol agents to be deployed at critical areas, as well as more Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. It provides for new communications equipment and greater use of unmanned surveillance drones. The Justice Department gets more money to help catch drug dealers and human traffickers.

“Efforts to overhaul our broken immigration system have once again taken a back seat to appeasing anti-immigrant xenophobes, as Congress passed another dramatic escalation in border enforcement with very little evidence that past escalations have been effective,” said Margaret Moran, president of the League of United Latin American Citizens.

More on this

Obama’s Statement on Passing the Border Security Bill

USA Today

As reported by the Legal Action Center (AILA).  Broadgate et al. v. USCIS et al., No. 1:10cv00941 (D.C.D. filed June 8, 2010)

Three employers (software developers and IT services firms) and two not-for-profit trade associations are challenging the Neufeld memo in federal district court. The plaintiffs allege that USCIS issued the memo in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act’s notice and comment requirements; that USCIS failed to perform a Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis; that the memo is inconsistent with existing regulations addressing the employee-employer relationship and the term “contractor” and conflicts with the plain language of the INA; and that it is arbitrary and capricious. Plaintiffs ask the court to preliminarily and permanently enjoin USCIS from implementing the memo.

AILA sent a detailed letter to USCIS Chief Council, Roxana Bacon, in which it expressed concern about the substance of the January 8, 2010 H-1B memo and noted that its issuance was in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act’s notice and comment requirements. The letter primarily focuses on recent USCIS decisions that unlawfully find that individuals with controlling or substantial interests in a petitioning U.S. company or its foreign parent company cannot — in most cases — be a beneficiary of a nonimmigrant or immigrant employment-based petition.

We will continue to keep you posted on this topic.

::::::::

USCIS Proposes Fee Increase

USCIS has published a Proposed Rule in the Federal Register to increase immigration fees.  The cost of applying for a green card will increase from $930 to $985.  The application fee for a family petition (I-130) will be $420, up from $355.  The cost of an I-140 employment-based petition will rise over $100 and premium processing fees will increase by 22.5%.  The application for employment authorization would increase to $380 from $340. A separate fee for fingerprints and other biometrics with many applications would increase to $85 from $80.  Among several new fees, officials said, will be a $6,230 charge for foreigners proposing to invest $500,000 or more in businesses to create jobs in the United States.

The NY Times reports that Alejandro Mayorkas, director of  USCIS, said the fee increase was necessary because declining applications for documents in the past two years had lowered revenues and left his agency — which is 90% financed by fees — with a budget shortfall of about $200 million for the coming fiscal year.

The increases come as Congress has put off immigration legislation and an Arizona law that makes it a state crime to be in the country illegally goes into effect July 29.

The timing makes Clarissa Martinez wonder what message the fee increases sends to immigrants trying to take a legal path into the country.  “It begs the question of Congress: If we want these people to take these steps, we have to make sure that we’re not pricing them out of their reach,” said Martinez, director of immigration and national campaigns for the National Council of La Raza, a Hispanic civil rights group.

::::::::

If you’d like to stay in touch with our office and sign up for our information, blog and news, you can do so here. You can follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn here.

In light of the recent controversial USCIS 19-page January 8, 2010 memo where USCIS takes a very strident and restrictive position on staffing agencies as employer/petitioners, we find it particularly disconcerting to learn that there are 200,000 contract employees working at the DHS, more than the 188,000 “civilian” workforce.

In a letter sent to the agency’s Secretary Janet Napolitano, Lieberman and Collins said the figure “raises the question of whether DHS itself is in charge of its programs and policies, or whether it inappropriately has ceded core decisions to contractors.”

Napolitano is slated to appear before the Senate committee and is expected to face questions on the subject. The senators want a unit-by-unit breakdown of where in Homeland Security the contractors are working and have asked for assurances that contractors are not performing “inherently governmental work.”

Clark Stevens, a spokesman for Homeland Security, told CNN Tuesday that “Secretary Napolitano has been strongly committed to decreasing the department’s reliance on contractors and strengthening the federal work force” at Homeland Security.

“Over the past year, we have been actively converting contractor positions to government positions and will continue to build on these efforts at an even more aggressive pace this year. We are working across the department to identify and make additional conversions as quickly as possible while sustaining the work force required to carry out our critical mission,” Stevens said.

How ironic could this possibly be?!  We will keep you posted.  For the story on CNN

The company used false information for H-2B work visas and charged workers fees ranging from $400 to $3,000 and allegedly threatened workers with a $5,000 fee if they returned to their home country, the Attorney’s Office said.

For more on this story