This is becoming serious business for human resource professionals, particularly if you know that you have paperwork violations buried in your I-9’s…AND….you’ve had turnover with the staff that are charged with handling I-9’s …and lastly, none of your staff has ever received formal I-9 compliance training.

Our compliance team can plan and structure a project to your needs that will ease the uncertainty of going through a partial or full audit of your I-9 employee population.  We ask all our clients and readership to strongly consider consulting with us, if you haven’t already, to discuss the management of your employee verification program, policy and procedures.  Please see today’s announcement from ICE.

In April 2009, Secretary Napolitano announced changes to ICE’s worksite enforcement strategy – which reduced the need for large-scale immigration enforcement actions where employees were arrested and instead focused on finding evidence to criminally charge employers and to increase the use of tools like I-9 audits, fines and debarment.

• This year, ICE criminally charged a record-breaking 180 owners, employers, managers and/or supervisors – up from 135 in FY 2008 and 114 in FY 2009.
• ICE conducted more than 2,200 I-9 audits – up from more than 1,400 in FY 2009.
• Since January 2009, ICE has imposed approximately $50 million in financial sanctions.
• ICE debarred 97 business and 49 individuals in FY 2010, up from 30 and 53, respectively, in FY 2009

Here’s an associated announcement from Secretary Napolitano.

We would urge you to be proactive in this area and put the matter of a “pre-audit”  I-9 audit on your agenda, or request training from us as to how to conduct your own internal audit.

Senate Dems Robert Menendez (NJ) and Patrick Leahy (VT) introduced the CIR Act of 2010 that proposes major  overhaul to the immigration system, making changes in employment and family-based programs with enhancements to I-9 (employment eligibility verification) employer obligations.  Most feel that this will not be the avenue by which CIR is accomplished, but that many of its ideas, including those int the CIR ASAP Bill that was introduced by Luis Gutierrez (D/IL) and the REPAIR proposal introduced by Senators Schumer (D-NY) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) earlier this year, will all be considered when Congress decides to get serious about tackling immigration reform and actually start debating the issues.

The Bill does propose the creation of an Immigration Commission that would have authority to recommend yearly NIV and IV numerical limits.

The Bill proposes changes to the H-1B program by requiring employers to post the job opening on a new DOL website.  Employer with 50 or more employees would be prohibited from petitioning for additional H-1B workers if their workforce was comprised of more than 50% H-1B and L-1 workers, excluding those who are the beneficiaries of a pending or approved labor certification or employer-based immigrant petition.  Additionally, employers would be prohibited from placing H-1B workers at a 3rd party site, unless the worker was primarily supervised and controlled by the petitioner/employer.

DOL would be charged with additional authority to review LCA’s for fraud or misrepresentation and would have up to 14 days to certify an LCA (makes one wonder if we’d ever get a case out the door!)  with additional authority to investigate complaints against H-1B employers and to conduct employer H-1B compliance audits.  This is yet another reminder to employers to make sure that their Public Access Files are in order and that they are working with immigration attorneys who provide them with PAF files and overall compliance guidance and training.

Proposed changes to the L-1 Program would include requiring employers to offer L-1 employees insurance and other benefits on the same basis as that offered to US workers.  Increasing restrictions would be imposed on “new office” L-1 petitions and would require DHS to submit a report to Congress on L-1Blanket use.  On the positive side, the bill wold provide some relief for small employers seeking L-1A status for foreign nationals.  It would forbid adjudicators from using the small size of an L-1 employer as a negative factor in executive or managerial eligibility for L-1A status, but would increase DHS authority to investigate complaints against L-1 employers and impose new penalties upon employers who violate L-1 regs.

*** (Relief for Registered Nurses) *** — The Bill proposes to create a new H-2C temporary, nonimmigrant visa for occupations for which there is a shortage of American labor.  The initial H-2C visa would be valid for three years and renewed for three more years. With some exceptions, an H-2C visa could be revoked if the visa holder has been unemployed for more than 60 days.  After 4 years, an H-2C non-immigrant may file an application for adjustment of status, provided that he/she has been continuously employed, establishes progress toward civics and English proficiency, meets all criminal and other background checks and pays additional fines and fees.

There is a proposal to include a new H-1C program for lesser-skilled workers with job offers from US employers, and the creation of a premium processing program for administrative appeals of employment-based immigrant petition denials.

Relief for Undocumented Immigrants: Creates a provisional legal status, Lawful Prospective Immigrant (LPI), for undocumented immigrants who are present in the U.S. as of September 30, 2010, register with the government, have never committed a serious crime, and are otherwise admissible to the United States.  LPI status will be initially valid for four years, with the possibility of extensions.  LPI status confers work and travel authorization.  After six years in LPI/LPID status, an applicant may apply to become a lawful permanent resident, provided he or she continues to meet all eligibility requirements, including renewed biometrics and background and security checks, and also establishes basic citizenship and English skills, payment of all taxes, and compliance with Selective Service registration.

Employment-based Immigrant Petitions: The bill would recapture unused employment and family-based visa numbers from 1992 to 2007, and implement for future years  that unusued immigrant visa numbers roll over each fiscal year including the base amount of 140,000 –  plus numbers from 1992-2007 – and any unusued numbers from the previous year.  Those with approved visa petitions who are subject to wait times would be eligible to apply for AOS upon payment of an additional $500 filing fee and would be entitled to 3-year EADs and travel documents.  Those with pending immigrant visa petitions would be eligible to apply for AOS at the discretion of DHS.

We link to a complete summary of the CIR Reform Act from Immigration Policy Center.

Immigration Solutions will continue to update and report on any and all CIR issues as they arise.

Fines Based Upon Inadequate Electronic I-9 System used to Track Worker Eligibility

Abercrombie & Fitch has been fined $1,047,110 in a settlement reached today with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ((ICE) for numerous technology-related deficiences in the company’s electronic I-9 system.

Referencing the ICE Press Release, the settlement is the result of a November 2008 Form I-9 inspection of Abercrombie & Fitch’s retail stores in Michigan.  The company was fully cooperative during the investigation and no instances of the knowing hire of unauthorized aliens were discovered. Since the initial inspection, Abercrombie & Fitch has taken measures to revise its I-9 Electronic Compliance Program, and has begun to implement new procedures to prevent future violations of federal immigration laws.

“Employers are responsible not only for the people they hire but also for the internal systems they choose to utilize to manage their employment process and those systems must result in effective compliance,” said Brian M. Moskowitz, special agent in charge of ICE HSI for Ohio and Michigan.  “We are pleased to see Abercrombie working diligently to complete the implementation of an effective compliance system; however, we know that there are other companies who are not doing so. This settlement should serve as a warning to other companies that may not yet take the employment verification process seriously or provide it the attention it warrants.”

With the above being said — this is a definite attention getter!  There’s alot of I-9 software on the market.  Some we’re familiar with – and others we are not.  Electronic I-9 software must adhere to certain recordkeeping standards and technical safeguards in order to ensure that the underlying I-9s are accurate, authentic and trustworthy.  Systems must retain the same sequence of data elements on the paper I-9.

The main point here is to recognize that your I-9 system is a compliance system which must serve a unique  compliance function.  Yes, we know that you want the fancy tools and flagging systems, but the essential fundamentals are critical. We like the following questions provided by LawLogix’ electronic I-9 team:

1. Will the vendor provide third party independent evaluation of the system (preferably by an attorney with deep I-9 experience)?
2. What type of guarantees does the vendor provide in the contract (e.g., indemnification for gross negligence)?
3. Is the vendor able to provide 5 similarly situated client references that use the same I-9 system?  This is an important one and will speak directly to how well the vendor is supporting their product, releasing  updates, responding to constant changes in I-9 policy and procedure.  You should ask the references whether or not they have been subjected to an ICE audit using the vendor’s system and how quickly the vendor was able to respond to ICE demands.

Conducting your due diligence goes without saying – don’t believe all the hype re bundled in legal services.  LawLogix, who we are familiar with and highly recommend, state that there is no “one size that fits all”.  Careful planning is required and discussion with trusted immigration counsel advisable prior to any decisions being made.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

If you’d like to schedule a time to discuss your I-9s, whether that be a randomly selected or full audit, staff training or working with you to establish a set pf policies and procedures around handling your I-9 compliance, we offer solutions and services both onsite or offsite by our talented and trained legal compliance team.  Give us  a call.  562 612.3996 – www.employer-compliance.com

We have been advised that for employers enrolled in E-Verify that, in conjunction with the redesign of the E-Verify web interface, employers will be required to complete the new on-line tutorial before being able to E-Verify new workers.

You will note, that there will be a sneak preview presentation (registration required) on Thursday June 10th.

For those of you who participated on the Listening Session conference call, USCIS has released the Executive Summary follow-up and recap of the call.  In the Summary, links are provided to a List of Federal Contractors that are enrolled in the FAR E-Verify Program, a link to the revised FAQ’s that can be found on the same page under links and resources.

A Self-Check Initiative will be introduced in December. This initiative will enable anyone to go to the website and run a verification query on him/herself and determine the accuracy of  his/her government record.

The Summary further states that USCIS has surpassed 200,000 registrants for E-Verify, which encompasses over 700,000 worksites nationwide, and:

•  A strong employee rights initiative has been created and a partnership with the Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Office of Special Counsel has been formed, resulting in the introduction of an employee hotline and the release of videos, both for employees and employers, to guide them through the Tentative Nonconfirmation (TNC) process. These videos can be viewed on the USCIS website and YouTube and are also available on DVD.
•  The E-Verify public web pages have been redesigned and features an expanded employee support section.

Cite as “AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 09112060 (posted Nov. 20, 2009)”

The House of Raeford Farms must pay a $1.5 Million fine and overhaul its hiring practices under an agreement that will allow a subsidiary to avoid prosecution on federal immigration charges.

The deal will also let two indicted managers at the poultry company’s Greenville, SC plant avoid criminal records, provided they enter a probationary program.

The settlement signed by federal prosecutors and company officials just hours before the case was set for trial Tuesday, gives the employer’s subsidiary, Columbia Farms, an opportunity to keep its record clean.  It likely ends a legal clash that could have cost the company millions of dollars in federal poultry contracts. Last year, Columbia Farms was charged with intentionally hiring illegal immigrants.

Under the settlement, Immigration will dismiss charges against the company if it improves its hiring practices over the next 2 years and submits to federal monitoring at its 8 plants in the Carolinas and Louisiana.  For more on this story

It has been reported that some 20,000 more unannounced employer site visits will be taking place over the next few months by FDNS, but this time it will be to employers who have filed H-1B extensions to determine if there is ongoing compliance by the employer.

It’s been asked, do they have the legal right to do this – just show up and demand to speak with a company’s representative or executive officer?  Yes, they do, although it hasn’t been acted upon to the extent we are now observing until your $500 Fraud Detection and Prevention government filing fee created the revenue to employ some 6,500 FDNS agents.  Up until now, USCIS or DOL agents have always been in a position to do onsite employer visits when they thought necessary – but it’s been rarely acted upon.  Presently, you can add ICE and FDNS to this group – because we’re in a hunt ‘em down, enforcement climate – and it’s the employers who are being targeted.

So, how does an employer handle this?  We don’t recommend that you wait to ask this question and to get your documentation organized when the agent comes knocking.  This is serious business now, and they are not just targeting the small to medium-size employer or the employer who has financial issues and can’t respond to requests to prove the ability to pay the offered wage to the employee.

Therefore, it is recommended that you discuss this with your immigration counsel now.  If you don’t have a representative, we are available to walk you through a program that will not only assist you in organizing your Public Access information and files, but we will give you the tools to prepare the company representative that will handle the agent site visit and to prepare them for the questions that will be asked, what documentation should be organized now and beeasily accessible to present to the agent when requested – and overall, how to successfully respond to a government site visit at your place of employment.

The new director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said today he wants to emphasize public engagement, transparency and information technology modernization of the immigration agency during his term.

To meet those goals, Alejandro Mayorkas said he has created a new Office of Public Engagement and is debuting a new, interactive Web site Sept. 22 that will allow for public feedback on agency policy and proposals. The updated Web site also will allow for greater ease of use and more access to information about pending requests and applications.

USCIS’ involvement with community stakeholders “should be more of a collaborative effort, engaged and interactive,” Mayorkas said. “We want to have the community involved at a level where we can understand what we are doing well — and what we are doing wrong.”

Another high priority is moving forward on implementing the next stages of the USCIS’ information technology transformation project, which will digitize the agency’s paper-based records systems, Mayorkas said. The project was started in 2005 and is expected to cost more than $500 million.

Mayorkas, a Cuban immigrant, was sworn in Aug. 24 to head the nation’s immigration and naturalization systems. He previously served as U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California and was a partner at the O’Melveny and Myers law firm.

Immigration Solutions has both the expertise and the legal counsel to walk you through the complex and challenging compliance rules and regulations that are being enforced today.  We link to our Compliance page and to an E-Verify Timeline for Federal Contractors to implement if their organization is awarded a federal contract.

The steps that federal contractors are now required to implement are extremely time-sensitive.  It is recommended that you confer with your immigration provider to make sure that you are properly implementing and adhering to the new E-Verify regulations that go into effect on September 8, 2009.  This does not mean, however, that federal contractors will be required to comply with the E-Verify requirements of the rule as of that date as per our Timeline Chart.

September 8th is the date on which federal government contracting officers will be required to begin including an E-Verify requirement in certain contracts awarded on or after that date.

We will continue to report on this and to provide clear and up-to-date information.  If you’d like to become a client of Immigration Solutions, please contact us.