USCIS received 233,000 new H-1B petitions last year against a quota of 85,000, and this year is expected to be even higher for FY 2017. Approximately one-half of the submitted petitions were not accepted for processing. As the economy has grown and and gained momentum, employers have been planning for months and making a list of candidates for whom they want to file H-1Bs.  The demand is expected to be huge this filing season, and the quota will be met in lightening speed. There are 5 business days to submit your cases, from April 1 to April 7, 2016 to access the opportunity of securing an extremely limited number of new H-1B slots.

So, planning is of the utmost importance.  Here are some important tips to get ready for H-B case filing on April 1^st:

• Assess your employment needs. Start to assess the number of H-1B petitions that your firm wishes to file. Coordinate with your immigration provider and assess legal and government filing fees.
• Do you need to obtain Credential Evaluations for your foreign educated applicants? Get this done early as the evaluation services will be swamped. Assess the relationship between the applicant’s degree and the position being offered. Does the degree equate to a 4-year US degree? If not, can the applicant produce employment verification letters so that previous work experience can be used to develop an evaluation that creates a nexus between their education and the offered position and to meet the degree requirement? It takes time to obtain these letters; therefore, close analysis of degree issues is of the utmost importance. These issues are being scrutinized more closely by USCIS each year. Lastly, if you wish to sponsor the applicant for their green-card in the future, make sure that the strategy you adopt for the H-1B can take you into a successful green-card process.
• Get the Labor Condition Application (LCA) early. It can take up to 7 business days to receive LCA’s from the Department of Labor (and longer as the clock ticks toward April 1^st). Once you have identified your hiring needs and obtained the necessary documentation to start the H-1B process, file the Labor Condition Application to avoid delays. Even though early filing means a shorter validity period for the H-1B petition, it is still advisable to have a timely filed and certified Labor Condition Application in hand for a complete case filing with USCIS.
• Start gathering necessary H-1B documentation right now. Develop your detailed job descriptions (not a list of requirements, but actual daily job duties and responsibilities).  Work with your legal team and the applicants that you wish to sponsor. Obtain degrees, transcripts, credential evaluations, employment letters, status documentation. These are required documents and do take time to analyze and assemble and, if missing, create delays and RFE’s.
• Be prepared for last minute changes in procedures and requirements. Last-minute changes in USCIS and Labor Department processes often arise with each new H-1B filing season.  Our office, of course, will keep you apprised as we continue to monitor any changes in procedure or requirements.

We are already accepting H-1B cases for processing and welcome your business.  Contact info@immigrationcompliancegroup.com or call 562 612.3996.

With the rash of RFE’s increasing year by year, this article is extremely informative and useful.

The important take away…..Work with evaluators that analyze USCIS policy and trends and that understand the education that is required for the type of visa being applied for.  Oftentimes there is a rush to secure an evaluation before nailing down the job title and job description with the client; this is a mistake.

So, whose fault is it REALLY and why does it matter whose fault it is anyway?

Sometimes it is the attorney or evaluators fault, but sometimes it is CIS’s fault.

Sometimes it is the fault of the evaluation but not the evaluator.

Sometimes it is CIS’s fault.

Sometimes it is the candidate’s fault.

Sometimes it is no one’s fault at all.

For more, refer here

We thank Sheila Danzig, TheDegreePeople.com, for this excellent article.

If you Previously had an H-1B for Less than 6 Years

Pursuant to § 212(g)7) of the The Act, if you had an H-1B in the past and were in the USA for less than 6 years, you may be eligible to recoup the time that is remaining on the 6-year maximum period of stay to accept employment with a new employer – without being counted against the cap.  An example of this would be someone who works for 3 years in H-1B classification and decides to go back to school on an F-1 student visa.  This individual would be eligible to apply for an H-1B for the remaining 3 years at any time of the year.

If you are abroad for at least one year, you have the choice to either apply for a “new” cap H-1B  for a full 6-year period, or take advantage of the remainder option if you previously had an H-1B.

H-1B 7^th Year Extensions – How This Works

If you are the beneficiary of a labor certification or an I-140 petition that was filed 1 year prior to your 6^th year in H-1B status, pursuant to §106 of AC21, you are permitted to file for a 7^th year extension.  You are also permitted, according to §104(c) of AC21, to apply for a 3-year extension of your H-1B when you have an approved I-140 petition and are unable to move forward with filing your permanent residency case due to employment-based immigrant visa country limits (referred to as retrogression).

If you are in the US and out of status due to a layoff, or are abroad, you are entitled to a 7^th year extension of your H-1B if your labor certification or I-140 petition was filed before your 6^th year in H-1B status with either the sponsoring employer, or with a new employer.  You will more than likely be required to consular process your case in these scenarios.

It is recommended that you seek the advice of a skilled immigration professional with the above cases as they are complex in nature.

You can sign up to receive our information here

There are certain classes of non-profit employers who are exempt from the H-1B cap. The exemption from the cap only applies to institutions of higher education, non-profit research institutions, government research institutions, and non-profits formally affiliated with an exempt educational institution.  Let’s discuss this.

 Institutions of higher education: Under the definition, an institution of higher education is one which:

• admits students who have completed secondary education;
• is licensed to provide education beyond secondary school;
• provides educational programs for which the institutions award bachelors’ degrees or provide programs of not less than 2 years that are acceptable for full credit toward bachelors’ degrees;
• is a public or nonprofit institution; and
• is accredited or has been granted pre-accreditation status by a recognized accrediting agency.

What does it mean to be related or affiliated to a higher education institution nonprofit entity?

The USCIS states that it is sufficient that a nonprofit entity is related or affiliated to an institution of higher education through shared ownership, control or be somehow affiliated to the higher education institution as a member, branch or subsidiary.

This narrow definition makes the types of non-profits that qualify for this exemption few and far between.  For instance, non-profit service, community, policy and arts organizations would not qualify for the exemption from the H-1B cap. Unless the non-profit employer is primarily devoted to research, or is formally affiliated with a university, it will not qualify as a cap-exempt H1B petitioner. Public secondary schools do not qualify for H1B cap-exemption unless they have a formal affiliation agreement with a college or university. However, the exemption does cover certain professionals employed by a for-profit entity but but does when working at an exempt location, as long as the work continues to serve the core mission of the exempt institution, such as a physicians’ practice group affiliated with and located at a university teaching hospital.

Nonprofit Research Organizations | Government Research Organizations:  Nonprofit research organizations or governmental research organizations, are defined in 8 CFR 214.2(h)(19)(iii)(C), as follows:

•   A nonprofit research organization is an organization that is primarily engaged in basic research and/or applied research.
•   A governmental research organization is a United States Government entity whose primary mission is the performance or promotion of basic research and/or applied research.

Basic research is general research to gain more comprehensive knowledge or understanding of the subject under study, without specific applications in mind. Basic research is also research that advances scientific knowledge, but does not have specific immediate commercial objectives although it may be in fields of present or potential commercial interest. It may include research and investigation in the sciences, social sciences, or humanities.  

Applied research is research to gain knowledge or understanding to determine the means by which a specific, recognized need may be met. Applied research includes investigations oriented to discovering new scientific knowledge that has specific commercial objectives with respect to products, processes, or services. It may include research and investigation in the sciences, social sciences, or humanities.

Conclusion

It should be noted that all of the criteria above must be met in order for an institution or an organization to qualify for a cap-exempt status for H-1B purposes. Such institutions and organizations can indicate that their H1B filing is cap exempt by marking Form I-129 (Petition of Non-Immigrant Worker) with a “yes” answer to questions 1, 2, or 3 in Part C of the H1B Data Collection and Filing Fee Exemption Supplement. Bear in mind that an employer or a foreign national who wishes to seek H-1B status under a cap-exempt petition must verify that they qualify for the cap exemption under one of the three categories above. It is recommended that you work with an immigration practitioner that understands this casework as the analysis is often complex.  If you’d like to become a client of our office, please contact us at info@immigrationcompliancegroup.com or call 562 612-3996.

There have been reports for some months now that the USCIS California Service Center has enforced new interpretation concerning the way it views H-1B requirements for job location changes, when duties and all other employment terms remain the same.

Previously, according to a 2003 legacy INS memo, a simple change in job location did not require that a new petition be filed with USCIS.  The employer was required to analyze prevailing wage for the new location, file and obtain a new certified Labor Condition Application (LCA) with the Department of Labor prior to the employee moving to the new location, post the LCA at the new work site according to DOL regulations, make sure wage and hour obligations were met, but did not have to file an amended petition with USCIS.

Under the CSC’s new and controversial interpretation, changes in job location alone do require amended petitions. In fact, employers are reporting site audits and revocation of H-1B petitions when USCIS inspectors could not find the H-1B worker at the work site listed in the petition. At this point, no other USCIS service center has followed this radical reinterpretation of the law – just the CSC.

Long-standing guidance still indicates that no amended petition should be required when only job location changes. However, to avoid adverse consequences – at least, until the CSC revisits its controversial new interpretation – employers should proceed with caution and work with a competent immigration professional whenever an H-1B worker’s job location changes, in order to determine whether any amended filings are required. Employers need to be careful to reveal all possible jobsite locations for each H-1B worker at the front end of case processing.

USCIS headquarters has the H-1B amendment issue under consideration and has indicated that they may issue additional guidance regarding this matter. In the meantime, please be advised that for cases under the jurisdiction of the CA Service Center for H-1B workers whose jobsite locations have changed, an amended petition prior to any geographic relocation is now required.

Should you wish to become a client of our office, please contact one of our immigration professionals at info@immigrationcompliancegroup.com, or call 562 612.3996.

At the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) 09/2010 Stakeholder Conference, the Vermont Service Center (VSC) advised that if compliance issues arose during the previous H-1B approval period, VSC could request evidence of all work performed during the previous H-1B approval period on requests for extension cases. VSC also confirmed that they are issuing one-year approvals where third-party work assignment is documented for less than one-year.

In light of the increase in RFEs focused on the employer-employee relationship, right to control, and availability of “qualifying employment” at third-party worksites, it is suggested that the following practice pointers be utilized in order to maximize the likelihood of securing a three-year H-1B extension for petitions involving placement at third-party worksites:

1. Submit a certified labor condition application (LCA) that lists multiple work locations, including the Petitioner’s home office address, as well as the third-party worksite location(s);
2. Document “qualifying employment” for the Beneficiary at the third-party worksite through End-Client letters confirming a project duration of longer than a year, preferably for the entire three years if the requested validity is three years;
3. End-Client letters should specify the job duties for the Beneficiary at the worksite, duration of the project, supervisor’s name, and supervisor’s telephone number. It is critical to establish that the Beneficiary is an employee of the Petitioner and that the Petitioner retains the ultimate “right to control” the Beneficiary;
4. Provide evidence of “qualifying employment,” such as: contracts, statement of work, work order between Petitioner and End-Client (if there are intermediate vendors involved, offer the entire chain of contracts between the Petitioner and End-Client); and
5. Submit Employee Handbooks as evidence of “Employer-Employee relationship” and “right to control.” Petitioner’s Employee Handbook should include issues such as salary, benefits, payroll procedures, performance evaluations, project progress review procedures, supervision of beneficiary’s work, right to hire/fire, etc. All of the previous stated items for the Petitioner’s Employee Handbook are requirements identified in the January 8, 2010, Neufeld Memo (AILA Doc. No. 10011363).

Immigration Solutions is available to assist you with with your H-1B case filings. Please contact us here

Department of Labor (DOL) announced in an October 28th meeting with representatives from the American Council on International Personnel (ACIP), the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) and other groups that it has been transitioning to a new contractor, and expects the change to result in both better PERM case processing and increased efforts to ensure program compliance. Employers should be aware that there could be some temporary processing slowdowns during the transition.

DOL further stated that PERM program users could soon see improvements in customer service, but should also expect more frequent audits and increased use of supervised recruitment.

DOL additionally disclosed that a new version of the PERM application, Form ETA 9089, is expected to go live in the near future and that the revised form will be fully integrated into DOL’s online iCERT portal.  In other PERM news, agency officials noted that the labor certification backlog was cut in half in Fiscal Year 2010, and there were general improvements in processing times overall. Enhancements are expected to the iCERT portal and in labor condition application (LCA) processing.  As of September 30th, the agency was working on non-audited cases that were filed in July 2010 and audited cases filed in August 2008.

Immigration Solutions will continue to report on  developments from the Department of Labor as they are released.

By Brandon Meyer
Immigration Associate

Bad economic news seems to be everywhere. Stories of banking crises, bailouts, rising unemployment, plummeting securities and housing prices, rising inflation, rising gas and food prices, recession, depression, and the end of prosperity have all become ubiquitous over the past couple of months. The bottom and the subsequent rebound are nowhere to be seen. Now take a deep breath, exhale, and relax. At the time this column was written, I was on a flight from San Diego to Austin packed with business travelers. Oil and other commodity prices have fallen back in recent months after reaching record highs. There are signs that credit markets are beginning to function again. Insofar as pundits cannot oversell the good times (remember Dow 36,000?), pundits cannot resist the temptation to oversell doom and gloom (remember predictions last summer that oil would reach $500 a barrel?). An October 26, 2008 article in the New York Times entitled “Forecasters Race to Call the Bottom to the Market”, explains this phenomenon in greater detail.

The outcome to recent manifestations of economic instability will hopefully be much more mundane. We will all muddle through somehow, although this may seem hard to reconcile for people under the age of 30 who have never really lived through a period of economic instability. Economic growth may be slow to non-existent for the foreseeable future, but full-scale economic collapse is unlikely.

What impact does this economic uncertainty have on immigration for employers and employees alike? Many employers may contemplate downsizing in order to cut costs or reduce employee work hours (“benching”) or pay. While these strategies may be necessary from a business perspective, employers need to keep in mind the potential impact on their foreign national employees. Employers with E-3 Australian and H-1B employees must ensure that any downward revision of wages received by these employees do not fall below the figure listed on the Labor Condition Application (“LCA”) that was obtained on their behalf. Failure to comply with wage obligations of an LCA could be considered noncompliance by the U.S. Department of Labor and could lead to negative consequences for the company. Employers are also required to offer H-1B employees who have been involuntarily terminated the cost of return transportation to their last place of foreign residence. This requirement does not extend to E-3 or TN workers or to dependents of H-1B employees. It is important to consult your labor or immigration attorney prior to terminating, benching, reducing working hours, or reducing wages for foreign national employees.

Furthermore, health care providers must ensure that offers of permanent employment to immigrant nurses also remain at a level equal to the prevailing wage of the Immigrant Visa petition (“IV”) that was filed on their behalf.

The upside for employers is that if unemployment continues to rise, the opportunities for recruiting highly skilled, highly qualified workers increases. Recruiting top-notch workers now places employers in a good position to capitalize on better times in the future.

Some industries, such as banking and finance, will face tough times for the foreseeable future. Some companies, such as Lehman Brothers, have already, or will disappear in the future. Others, such as Wachovia, will be purchased and subsumed into their new owner’s business. Other industries, such as health care, are more insulated from economic slowdowns, and in fact may be poised for greater growth as Baby Boomers enter their golden years.

Foreign national employees generally feel a greater sense of insecurity during periods of economic uncertainty, as they may believe that their immigrant status makes them more vulnerable to selection for any company downsizing. How companies manage this (mis)perception is critical for maintaining employee morale and retention.

In addition to the LCA and return transportation protections for H-1B employees, there are a number of other protections for foreign national employees. Chief among them are provisions allowing H-1B employees to change employers upon the filing of a new H-1B petition, provided the employee is maintaining H-1B status. Upon termination, H-1B employees generally have ten days to depart the United States. H-1B change of employers provisions are helpful in allowing an H-1B employee to change employers in the wake of corporate downsizing, provided that the H-1B employee is still on the books of the initial company at the time of filing of the H-1B petition by the new employer. The H-1B employee can commence employment with the new company upon proper filing of the new H-1B petition. Please consult your immigration attorney prior to terminating an H-1B employee or hiring a new H-1B employee pursuant to the H-1B change of employer provisions.

An even more important protection for foreign national employees rests in the Adjustment of Status (“AOS”) portability provisions of the American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act (“AC-21”). A foreign national with an AOS application pending for 180 days or more based on an approved or pending (with the proviso that the petition was ‘approvable when filed’) IV petition on Form I-140, that has not been withdrawn by the petitioning company or otherwise revoked by USCIS, may seek employment with a different employer in a ‘same or similar’ occupation that the I-140 petition was filed. The foreign national should notify USCIS of the change of employer, along with a description of how the new job opportunity is the ‘same or similar’ to the job opportunity described in the I-140 petition. In the absence of governing regulations, there is a lot of grey area and wide divergence of practice for how employers and employees handle AOS portability situations. However, USCIS expects to publish regulations governing AC-21 that purport to address these issues in the near future. Please consult your immigration attorney when encountering employees with possible AC-21 issues.

The next economic boom is always just around the corner. Strong companies will emerge from this period of economic uncertainty stronger and ready to seize upon new opportunities. Employees can also emerge stronger and wiser from the experience.

I will be attending the 21st Annual AILA California Chapters Conference from November 13th through 15th in San Francisco, California. I will report on any developments and other pertinent information that may emerge from this Conference in the December 2008 Immigration Solutions newsletter.

Stay tuned!