The long-awaited final rule to modernize and improve several aspects of employment-based nonimmigrant and immigrant visa programs, in order to retain EB-1, EB-2 and EB-3 immigrant workers and high-skilled nonimmigrant workers, is moving forward and has made it through the OMB review process.  It was published in the Federal Register on November 18, 2016 and will be effective in 60 days.   USCIS has also amended regulations to better enable U.S. employers to hire and retain certain foreign workers who are beneficiaries of approved employment-based immigrant visa petitions and are waiting to become lawful permanent residents. This rule goes into effect on Jan. 17, 2017, just before President Obama leaves office.

Among other things, DHS is amending its regulations to:

• Clarifies and improves longstanding DHS policies and practices implementing sections of the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act and the American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act related to certain foreign workers, which will enhance USCIS’ consistency in adjudication.

• Better enables U.S. employers to employ and retain high-skilled workers who are beneficiaries of approved employment-based immigrant visa petitions (Form I-140 petitions) while also providing stability and job flexibility to these workers. The rule increases the ability of these workers to further their careers by accepting promotions, changing positions with current employers, changing employers and pursuing other employment opportunities.   This means that you can use the previous employer’s I-140 petition to extend your H-1B with a new employer even if it is withdrawn (as long as it was withdrawn more than 180 days after approval), or in the event of the termination of the employer’s business.  So, there is no I-140 portability; you will still need a new labor certification and I-140 petition to file your adjustment of status application.

• The final rule provides two grace periods of up to 10 days, consistent with those already available to individuals in 13 some nonimmigrant classifications, to individuals in the E-1, E-2, E-3, L-1, and TN classifications. The rule allows an initial grace period of up to 10 days prior to the start of an authorized validity period, allowing nonimmigrants in the above classifications a reasonable amount of time to enter the US and prepare to begin employment. The rule also allows a second grace period of up to 10 days after the end of an authorized validity period, which provides a reasonable amount of time to depart the US or take other actions to extend, change, or maintain lawful status.

• Establishes a grace period of up to 60 consecutive days during each authorized validity period for certain high-skilled nonimmigrant workers when their employment ends before the end of their authorized validity period provided their authorized stay is valid for at least 60 days after such cessation. If not, the grace period will end on the date the authorized date is set to expire. This will obviously enable own to more readily pursue new employment and an extension of their nonimmigrant status.

• The Final rule allows allows certain high-skilled individuals in the United States  to apply for work authorization, given:

1. They are the principal beneficiaries of an approved Form I-140 petition,
2. An immigrant visa is not authorized for issuance for their priority date, and
3. They can demonstrate compelling circumstances exist that justify DHS issuing an employment authorization document in its discretion. Such employment authorization may only be renewed in limited circumstances and only in one year increments.

• Automatically extends the employment authorization in the same category and validity of Employment Authorization Documents for up to 180 days from the date of the prior EAD’s expiry (EADs or Form I-766’s) or until djudication of the EAD nrenewal application, for certain individuals who apply on time to renew their EADs.  The Form I-9 rule is also updated to permit an I-797 receipt notice to be accepted as a permissible I-9 document, in conjunction with the expired EAD, to re-verify the foreign national’s work authorization. This additional 180-day period will not apply to those categories that first require the approval of an underlying application before the EAD renewal can be adjudicated.

• Eliminates the regulatory provision that requires USCIS to adjudicate the Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, within 90 days of filing and that authorizes interim EADs in cases where such adjudications are not conducted within the 90-day timeframe.

• Clarifies various policies and procedures related to the adjudication of H-1B petitions, including, among other things, providing H-1B status beyond the six year authorized period of admission, determining cap exemptions and counting workers under the H-1B cap program.

For more information, please refer here for the Final Rule.  If you have any questions, please contact our office.  We will continue to keep you posted on the implementation of these new policies.

Top officials from the White House and the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services are in Silicon Valley for the week to solicit viewpoints and input from the start-up community on how the administration can improve the way it hands out visas to talented entrepreneurs who’ve landed funding to create new companies.  While Obama is asking the question how he can improve the immigration process for foreign entrepreneurs, he’s stating to UniVision, “I’ve got 5 years left to solve immigration.”  Our question is, must we really remain in the dark ages for 5 more years?

The article states that comprehensive immigration reform legislation continues to remain stalled in congress, as is specific bi-partisan legislation that attempts to address some of these start-up visa issues. So the Obama administration is left trying to make the most of the rules that it currently has on the books by re-interpreting a more accommodating implementation of those rules with fresh information gathered from the field.   The consensus is that Obama lacks the conviction to use his executive authority in an election year on controversial immigration issues, and that this is simply PR.  We say — this is exactly the time for him to use his executive authority anywhere he possibly can concerning immigration reform.   We shall see if anything comes of this.  More on this here.

Over the last year, employers have continued to experience unannounced site visits by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ Office of Fraud Detection and National Security (FDNS), and it is expected that site visits will increase in 2011.  FDNS conducts site inspections to verify the information that employers provide in their immigration petitions. Most recently, site visits have focused on approved H-1B, L-1 and some O-1 petitions. Some employers have reported receiving multiple site visits pertaining to separate petitions and foreign workers.

In this series, we will address questions and inquiries that we have received pertaining to USCIS site visits.  If your company is contacted by an FDNS officer, you should call your designated Immigration Solutions professional immediately to discuss options, including the possibility of having counsel present during a site visit.

1)  Why is USCIS making employer site visits?   Site visits are conducted as part of a Benefits Fraud Assessment (BFA). BFAs are initiatives that review specific immigration programs – such as the H-1B or L-1 program – to determine the incidence of fraud in that particular program. A BFA typically lasts for several months. During this time, USCIS will randomly select a large number of petitions or applications for benefits in the particular category being assessed. These cases are assigned to FDNS officers, who visit the premises of sponsoring employers to verify the existence of the employer, the validity of the information the employer has provided in an immigration petition, and whether sponsored foreign nationals are working in compliance with the terms of their admission to the United States.

In addition to verifying the validity of data contained in an immigration petition, FDNS officers use information collected during site visits to help USCIS develop a fraud detection database. FDNS officers gather information to build profiles of the types of companies that have records of good faith use of immigration programs and records of immigration compliance, and also to identify factors that could indicate fraud. 

2)  Does USCIS give advance notice of a site visit?   Not necessarily. In most cases, officers from the FDNS unit will arrive at the worksite unannounced, though occasionally an officer may call the company to inform it of an impending visit.

3)  Can your attorney be present during the site visit?  You can ask to have counsel present during the site visit, especially because your attorney has submitted a Form G-28 notice of appearance of attorney, confirming that the company has legal representation in connection with each petition it files.  FDNS officers will not typically reschedule a site visit to accommodate the presence of an attorney, but may agree to allow counsel to be present by phone. In the alternative, you may contact your Immigration Solutions with questions during a site visit. If the officer is resistant, you should explain that having the company’s immigration counsel present or available by phone will help the employer respond fully and accurately to the officer’s questions and requests for information.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

As always, we welcome your feedback. If you are interested in becoming an Immigration Solutions client, please call our office at 562 612.3996 and request a consultation. We handle a broad range of business related immigration matters and have an active employer compliance practice and consult on proper I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification) best practices, auditing, training, and work with our clients to develop compliant immigration policies and procedures.  We offer these services, as well, to government contractors and advise on FAR E-Verify enrollment and compliance issues.  Visit our new I-9 Employer Resource center here

Not only do several immigration fees increase as of 11/23/2010, but a revised I-129 (Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker) will make its debut on 11/23/2010 as well, and will become mandatory beginning December 22nd.  USCIS will accept previous editions of the form for 30 days or until December 21, 2010.

The new I-129 petition has been months in the making, and is the first major overhaul of the petition in years. When it is implemented, employers will see new questions and compliance issues, particularly for H-1B and L-1 filings.  The petition is used for temporary workers in a variety of nonimmigrant visa classifications.

The revised form will be available on 11/23/2010 on www.uscis.gov

Senate Dems Robert Menendez (NJ) and Patrick Leahy (VT) introduced the CIR Act of 2010 that proposes major  overhaul to the immigration system, making changes in employment and family-based programs with enhancements to I-9 (employment eligibility verification) employer obligations.  Most feel that this will not be the avenue by which CIR is accomplished, but that many of its ideas, including those int the CIR ASAP Bill that was introduced by Luis Gutierrez (D/IL) and the REPAIR proposal introduced by Senators Schumer (D-NY) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) earlier this year, will all be considered when Congress decides to get serious about tackling immigration reform and actually start debating the issues.

The Bill does propose the creation of an Immigration Commission that would have authority to recommend yearly NIV and IV numerical limits.

The Bill proposes changes to the H-1B program by requiring employers to post the job opening on a new DOL website.  Employer with 50 or more employees would be prohibited from petitioning for additional H-1B workers if their workforce was comprised of more than 50% H-1B and L-1 workers, excluding those who are the beneficiaries of a pending or approved labor certification or employer-based immigrant petition.  Additionally, employers would be prohibited from placing H-1B workers at a 3rd party site, unless the worker was primarily supervised and controlled by the petitioner/employer.

DOL would be charged with additional authority to review LCA’s for fraud or misrepresentation and would have up to 14 days to certify an LCA (makes one wonder if we’d ever get a case out the door!)  with additional authority to investigate complaints against H-1B employers and to conduct employer H-1B compliance audits.  This is yet another reminder to employers to make sure that their Public Access Files are in order and that they are working with immigration attorneys who provide them with PAF files and overall compliance guidance and training.

Proposed changes to the L-1 Program would include requiring employers to offer L-1 employees insurance and other benefits on the same basis as that offered to US workers.  Increasing restrictions would be imposed on “new office” L-1 petitions and would require DHS to submit a report to Congress on L-1Blanket use.  On the positive side, the bill wold provide some relief for small employers seeking L-1A status for foreign nationals.  It would forbid adjudicators from using the small size of an L-1 employer as a negative factor in executive or managerial eligibility for L-1A status, but would increase DHS authority to investigate complaints against L-1 employers and impose new penalties upon employers who violate L-1 regs.

*** (Relief for Registered Nurses) *** — The Bill proposes to create a new H-2C temporary, nonimmigrant visa for occupations for which there is a shortage of American labor.  The initial H-2C visa would be valid for three years and renewed for three more years. With some exceptions, an H-2C visa could be revoked if the visa holder has been unemployed for more than 60 days.  After 4 years, an H-2C non-immigrant may file an application for adjustment of status, provided that he/she has been continuously employed, establishes progress toward civics and English proficiency, meets all criminal and other background checks and pays additional fines and fees.

There is a proposal to include a new H-1C program for lesser-skilled workers with job offers from US employers, and the creation of a premium processing program for administrative appeals of employment-based immigrant petition denials.

Relief for Undocumented Immigrants: Creates a provisional legal status, Lawful Prospective Immigrant (LPI), for undocumented immigrants who are present in the U.S. as of September 30, 2010, register with the government, have never committed a serious crime, and are otherwise admissible to the United States.  LPI status will be initially valid for four years, with the possibility of extensions.  LPI status confers work and travel authorization.  After six years in LPI/LPID status, an applicant may apply to become a lawful permanent resident, provided he or she continues to meet all eligibility requirements, including renewed biometrics and background and security checks, and also establishes basic citizenship and English skills, payment of all taxes, and compliance with Selective Service registration.

Employment-based Immigrant Petitions: The bill would recapture unused employment and family-based visa numbers from 1992 to 2007, and implement for future years  that unusued immigrant visa numbers roll over each fiscal year including the base amount of 140,000 –  plus numbers from 1992-2007 – and any unusued numbers from the previous year.  Those with approved visa petitions who are subject to wait times would be eligible to apply for AOS upon payment of an additional $500 filing fee and would be entitled to 3-year EADs and travel documents.  Those with pending immigrant visa petitions would be eligible to apply for AOS at the discretion of DHS.

We link to a complete summary of the CIR Reform Act from Immigration Policy Center.

Immigration Solutions will continue to update and report on any and all CIR issues as they arise.

The day following President Obama signing Public Law 111-230, the fee increase on H-1B and L-1 visas became effective (August 14, 2010) through September 30, 2014.

What exactly is this law and what does it stipulate? It requires the submission of an additional fee of $2,000 for certain H-1B petitions and $2,250 for certain L-1A and L-1B petitions postmarked on or after August 14, 2010.  We were surprised that this announcement  which our office just saw posted today, is retroactive and being implemented before USCIS revises the I-129 Petition.  The fees apply to initial H-1B or L-1 employment – change of status and change of employer cases, in the same instances that require the Fraud Prevention Fee.  It is not required if an employer is filing to extend an H-1B or L-1 employee’s status.

What employers are subject to the new fee increase? The fee increase apply to employers who employ 50 or more employees in the USA with more than 50% of its employees in the USAS in H-1B or L (including L-1A, L-1B and L-2) nonimmigrant status. Petitioners meeting these criteria must submit the fee with an H-1B or L-1 petition filed.  It is noted that L-2 dependents of L-1 employees, are eligible for employment authorization documetns (EADs).  The USCIS recognized the difficulty for employers in adding such individuals into the count, but concluded that it is required under the law.  We are interpreting that this means that an employer who hires an L-2 dependent that has work authorization will be required to pay an additional fee of $2,250 to continue to employ them where an EAD is required for authorized employment.

USCIS will issue RFE’s: According to the August 19, 2010 public teleconference that USCIS held, cases filed without the new fee will not be rejected.  USCIS will issue Requests for Evidence (RFEs) on the cases that the new fee appears to be required.  Where USCIS does not any notation or attached evidence with the initial filing, it may issue an RFE to determine whether the petition is covered by the  Public Law. An RFE may be required even if such evidence is submitted, they advise, if questions arise.

Recommendations: USCIS encourages employers to include the additional fee as a separate check rather than adding this amount to the other filing fee checks, making it easy to simply return a check rather than reject an entire case filing for an incorrect filing fee.  Until such time as the form is revised, it has been recommended that the petitioner include a notation of whether the fee is required in bold capital letters at the top of the cover letter and, if it is required, pertinent documentation.

Issues: There are questions pertaining to L-1 petitions under the L-1 blanket program and how to work this out abroad at the US Consulates.  We will continue to keep you informed on this issue.

An interesting sidebar that came to light yesterday on the fee increase had to do with the fact that since it is common knowledge that the law targets Indian staffing agencies and consulting companies as well as medium to large IT employers, that it is probably a violation of the General Agreement on Trade and Services, an agreement that is vital to ensuring US companies are able to employ many of the 6,000,000 Americans working around the world.

Further, reported by Computerworld, the Department of State revealed this week that the U.S. is reviewing whether a law that increases some visa fees is compliant with World Trade Organization (WTO) rules and are also talking to Indian officials about the law and its implications.  India’s Commerce Secretary Rahul Khullar told reporters in Delhi on Tuesday that the visa fee hike is incompatible with the WTO.

We encourage you to sign up to receive our free information and join our worldwide readership.

::::::::::::::::::::::

Immigration Solutions provides US and global visa services to individuals and employers throughout the USA and abroad.  We specialize in business immigration and have a depth of experience in the IT, healthcare, arts, entertainment, and sports industries, amongst others.  Our services include complex business visas for investors, multinational managers, skilled professionals and outstanding individuals in science, business, education, athletics and entertainment.  We additionally provide employer compliance consulting services on proper I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification) auditing, training, and work with our clients to develop compliant immigration policies and procedures.  We offer these services, as well, to government contractors and advise on FAR E-Verify enrollment and compliance issues.

There’s been alot of chatter today about the introduction of Rep. Gutierrez’ (D-IL) immigration bill that is called Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America’s Safety and Protection (CIR ASAP).

Yesterday, Rep. Gutierrez stated, “We have waited patiently for a workable solution to our immigration crisis to be taken up by this Congress and our President.  The time for waiting is over.”

To address some of the key points:

Backlog Reduction: This would be  a recapture of unused employment-based visas from  previous years (1992 – 2008) with an allowance for future unused visas to roll over the next year; exempting spouses and children from the annual cap; increasing the country quotas; the ability to file for AOS (adjustment of status; i.e. green-cards) before a visa number is available by paying a fee of $500, even thought a visa cannot be issued until a visa number is available.  This does, however, allow for work authorization, travel authorization and maintenance of status.

Employment Verification: Would make E-Verify work verification mandatory for all employers by phasing in current employees and new hires; would impose additional pealties on employers’ failure to follow the E-Verify program.

H-1B and L-1 Nonimmigrant Visas: Would impose requirements on employers to recruit US workers before applying for an H-1B and would increa3se penalties for H-1B violations.  Would create penalties for L-1 violations.

The Undocumented: Would create a 6-year ‘conditional’ non-immigrant status for undocumented (illegal) foreign nationals in the USA.  This would include work authorization and travel authorization; would waive unlawful presence bars and provide a path to permanent residence (green-card) and citizenship.

The Immigration Policy Center has an excellent 6-page more detailed review of the bill which we link to.

AILA applauded the introduction of Rep. Gutierrez’ Bill and stated, “We know how dedicated Rep. gutierrez is to immigration reform,” commented Bernie Wolfsdorf, president of AILA.  “Gutierrez has long been a strong and vocal leader in the CIR movement.  We look forward to analyzing this new CIR bill and hope to work with him and other members of Congress to fix our nation’s dysfunctional immigration system and help spur the country back to economic recovery.”

AILA further stated:  Already, the Congressional Progressive Caucus, the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus and members of the Congressional Black Caucus have endorsed the bill as a solution to both stem illegal immigration and promote legal migration that will protect and strengthen our nation’s economic and national security.

Gutierrez explained at his press conference yesterday that the Senate will still take the lead on debating immigration reform with a bill to be introduced by Sen Charles Schumer (D-NY), Chair of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration.  Janet Napolitano (DHS Secretary) has indicated that they have provided extensive technical assistance to Schumer and his staff as they draft the bill that is predicted to be introduced early 2010.

We will continue to report on any and all news and progress on the immigration reform front.

If you’re interested in more reading….Homeland Security Today NY Times ABC News The Hill

Recent panel discussions at the AILA Conference in NV focused on the H-1B program.  The $500 anti-fraud fee collected for H-1B and L-1 visas is being used to hire more investigators.  Business practices once considered “the norm” and perhaps not perfect – are being scrutinized and employers are being penalized for document violations and overall inattention to detail. Consular offices and USCIS are asking for photos of premises, employment agreements, business licenses and organizational charts.  These requests are way out of bounds, and considerably prolong case processing creating tremendous stress for all parties concerned – the employer, the employee and the immigration practitioner.

A recent posting on AILA of a Fraud Summary Sheet (that wasn’t posted for very long!) for H-1B and L-1 cases, presumes fraud if one meets 2 out of 3 criteria:  doing business for fewer than ten years, has fewer than 25 employees, and/or has less than $10 million in revenue.  Many high-profile, very reputable organizations are receiving these Requests for Evidence based on the Fraud Cheat Sheet without any basis in reality.

This preoccupation with fraud in the H-1B and L-1 programs is likely to continue in the upcoming year.  So, in terms of supporting evidence….a word to the wise…