By:  Timothy Sutton, Communications Editor

After two years of being deadlocked in the court system, the injunction preventing Arizona’s police force from enforcing the racially controversial “papers please,” program was lifted Wednesday by U.S. District Court Judge Susan Bolton. The decision is the latest legal move in Valle del Sol v. Whiting, a class action legal challenge to SB 1070 that was filed in May 2010. Plaintiffs include an Arizona-born citizen of Spanish and Chinese descent who was racially profiled.  “While today’s ruling puts civil rights at risk, it does nothing to undermine our resolve to continue fighting until SB 1070 is struck down in its entirety,” said Chris Newman, legal director of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network. The Supreme Court upheld SB 1070 2(b), also known as the “papers please,” provision, earlier this summer. However, Justice Kennedy suggested there would be clear constitutional problems if the law were used to target racial or ethnic minorities, or to detain people for an unreasonable period of time while checking their immigration status. Opponents assert this unwanted outcome of targeting minorities is certain to transpire.

However, Governor Jan Brewer insists that the “papers please,” law does not allow Arizona law enforcement to conduct pretext stops because it requires reasonable suspicion. In a public statement she claimed Wednesday’s District Court ruling is “one big step closer to implementing the core provision of SB 1070.” That provision? Ridding Arizona of illegal immigrants.

Arizona’s highly controversial Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio was also been quoted on the Glenn Beck Show, clarifying his interpretation of reasonable suspicion, “If they have their speech, what they look like, if they look like they come from another country, we can take care of that situation.” As Brewer and Arpaio ramp up for the certain increase in detainment leading to deportation both Cecilia Wong of the ACLU and Victor Viramontes of MALDEF have committed to continue the fight against SB 1070.

It won’t be long before SB 1070 2(b) is back in the courthouse being challenged for racial profiling and discrimination based upon national origin. We will keep you updated on those and other immigration related breaking news as it develops. For more information, contact one of our immigration professionals at info@immigrationcompliancegroup.com or call 562 612.3996.

By: Timothy Sutton, Communications Editor

The State of Arizona behind Governor Jan Brewer has made their position clear, they do not support Deferred Action Childhood Arrivals. Brewer signed her own executive order to “defend” Arizona from President Obama’s Deferred Action Program. Executive Order 2012-06 alleges that because DACA workers are not given lawful status, but merely deferred status, DACA recipients can be legally denied the right to obtain a driver’s license or any public benefit.

Brewer justifies her executive order as a defense against DACA which she refers to as “federal paperwork,” that will result in “significant and lasting impacts on the Arizona budget, it’s healthcare system and additional public benefits that Arizona taxpayers fund.” A Brewer spokesperson sited specific public benefits that DACA holders will not be eligible for: KidsCare, a children’s health-insurance program; unemployment benefits; business and professional licenses and government contracts.

Legal challenges to Brewer opposition of Obama’s DACA program are expected this week. Under the REAL ID Act of 2005 Sec.202(C)(B)(2)(viii), a federal law that modified requirements for state driver’s licenses and ID cards, “deferred action” is a term used for those eligible for state issued identification and driver’s licenses. According to NBC News, Regina Jefferies a local Phoenix attorney, criticized Brewer’s executive order saying, “Immigrants in Arizona have in the past been granted “deferred action” for other reasons long before the new Childhood Arrivals program was announced.” Additionally, Brewer’s spokesperson said that DACA students would not receive in-state tuition pricing.

After Brewer’s announcement, protester’s outside of the Arizona state capital waived signs that read, “Why the hate?” This sentiment raises the question, is Brewer guilty of playing politics with immigrant lives? Certainly, extreme curtailing of the DACA program by states like Arizona (and Florida) appears to be less about state preservation than politics. This preemptive strike against the Presidential Executive Order is a sign of the strong resistance to come for future immigration reform that favors inclusion over deportation.

California officials announced they would honor the DACA program and issue driver’s licenses to eligible persons. As temporary California residents, DACA beneficiaries will be afforded in-state tuition pricing, driver’s licenses, and the temporary ability to seek employment.

The national success of the DACA program shall remain closely monitored. We will continue to keep you updated on this and other breaking immigration news. If your business has questions about the DACA program or hiring from this temporary workforce, contact one of our immigration professionals at info@immigrationcompliancegroup.com or call 562 612.3996.

Please check out our news and stay informed.

More articles:  AZ Denies Dreamers GED Classes 

Driver’s Licenses Vary by State

By:  Timothy Sutton, Communications Editor

On August 10, 2012, the 3^rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Wal-Mart Stores Inc., facing charges for acts of transporting illegal immigrants, harboring illegal immigrants, encouraging illegal immigration, conspiracy to commit money laundering, and involuntary servitude. Zavala et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., spanned eight years and four judicial opinions. The allegations against Wal-Mart suggested that senior officials knowingly and willingly permitted contractors and sub-contractor to hire illegal immigrants to perform after-hour janitorial services.

In their defense, Wal-Mart asserted that the plaintiff janitorial workers were not employees (therefore, not under their control), but also performed work at a Marriott hotel, a movie theater, and remodeling homes. Further, Wal–Mart often used store associates (regular, non-contract employees) to clean its stores. As a result, the court found that Wal-Mart did not knowingly hire illegal immigrant workers or encourage their contractors to do so. The court refused to certifying the class action based upon the shared discrete characteristic of plaintiffs as undocumented immigrants, stating: “Being similarly situated does not mean simply sharing a common status, like being an illegal immigrant.”

Moving forward, it is likely that Wal-Mart will amend its screening and compliance policies when hiring contractual workers. Many of the allegations against the big-box retailer reveal suspect employment practices that should be avoided including:

• Management commenting on immigration status of workers
• Using out-of-state relief workers immediately following the arrest of workers by federal immigration authorities
• Allowing workers to store personal belongings in store
• Allowing workers to sleep in store

For more information about the latest immigration court rulings and other breaking immigration news, subscribe to our blog and contact our office to discuss your I-9 audits, training and compliance program needs, 562 612.3996, info@immigrationcompliancegroup.com.

By:  Timothy Sutton, Communications Editor

HerbCo International Owner Ted Andrews, Vice President David Lykin and General Manager Debra Howard will appear in Court on May 1, 2012, charged with re-hiring nearly two dozen of the 86 workers fired after an I-9 audit by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency back in February of 2011. A HerbCo employee tipped off authorities about the scheme to pay these 20 illegal workers roughly $40,000 in cash, despite being fired for non-conforming I-9 forms and failing to pass E-verify background checks.

During an ICE Audit of 334 I-9 forms, it was found that 214 employees had presented fraudulent documents.  All the employees listed in the social security “no-match letter” who were still employed, 86 of them, were terminated.

Under federal law, an employer is required to verify the identity and work authorization of every employee hired. However, there are limitations on how an employer can legally seek additional verification of documents they suspect to be fraudulent.

The HerbCo executives are expected to receive a year of probation for guilty pleas to their criminal charges. Prosecutors are seeking an additional $1M in fines from HerbCo, sending an obvious message to employers that hire illegal workers.

The US Attorney’s office stated the following regarding the amount of the fine, “Within the worksite universe of either the United States or the State of Washington, the defendants’ conduct appears unremarkable only because of the sheer numbers of other culpable employers who have not been prosecuted for similar conduct. Of 20 million illegal aliens residing in the United States and 230,000 in the State of Washington, 86 were employed at Herbco on April 15, 2011.”

For more information about how to safeguard your business from a costly I-9 audit, contact our firm at info@immigrationcompliancegroup.com or call 562 612.3996.

We  link to more on this, and here also.

The owner of a Southern California furniture manufacturing company, Brownwood Furniture located in Rancho Cucamonga, has been sentenced to 10 months in federal prison for knowingly hiring illegal immigrants and six months for continuing to employ illegal aliens.  The sentences will be served concurrently.  In addition to the prison terms, he was ordered to pay a $15,000 fine.

Prosecutors say 57-year-old Brownwood Furniture owner Rick Vartanian was told earlier that 61 of his 73 workers at the facility were illegal immigrants and had submitted invalid documents to obtain their jobs.  In November 2009, Vartanian told U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents that the illegal immigrants no longer worked for Brownwood Furniture, but investigators discovered 18 illegal immigrants were still working for him.  Vartanian, who was convicted of obstruction of justice and employing illegal immigrants, was sentenced Monday by a Los Angeles federal judge.

Brownwood Furniture vice president Michael Patrick Eberly pleaded guilty to employing illegal immigrants and he was placed on a years’ probation and fined $10,000.

The charges against the defendants stem from an investigation that began after ICE HSI received an anonymous tip that Brownwood furniture was using unauthorized labor. An audit of the company’s hiring records in July 2009 revealed that 61 of the firm’s 73 employees had submitted invalid documents to obtain their jobs. After ICE HSI notified the company about the discrepancies, the executives told investigators the unauthorized workers had been terminated. However, when ICE HSI agents executed a search warrant at the business in Dec. 2009, they encountered 30 unauthorized workers, 18 of whom had purportedly been terminated following the July audit.

These sentences make very clear that employers who knowingly hire unauthorized workers, face seriously dire consequences.

Should you require the services of an expert team of employer compliance specialists, please contact our office to discuss your situation and visit our I-9 Employer Compliance Resource Center:  www.I-9Audits.com

The Obama administration has been holding behind-the-scenes talks to determine whether the Department of Homeland Security can unilaterally grant legal status on a mass basis to illegal immigrants, a former Bush administration official who spoke with at least three people involved in those talks told FoxNews.com on 6/21/10.

The issue was raised publicly by eight Republican senators who wrote to the White House last week to complain that they had heard the administration was readying a “Plan B” in case a comprehensive immigration reform bill cannot win enough support to clear Congress.

The White House has neither confirmed or denied this claim.  It’s unclear what section of the illegal immigrant population such a move would target. But the former Bush official said the discussions are real.

“The administration at the very minimum is studying legal ways to legalize people without having to go through any congressional debate about it,” the source said, calling the senators’ claim credible. “Whether somebody pulls the trigger on that, that’s another issue.”

The senators — Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa; Orrin Hatch, R-Utah; David Vitter, R-La.; Jim Bunning, R-Ky.; Saxby Chambliss, Ga.; Johnny Isakson, R-Ga.; and James Inhofe, R-Okla  — claimed in their letter that the administration was looking at extending what is known as deferred action or parole to millions of illegal aliens in the United States.

For more on this story

First they were arrested and faced deportation under what has proven to be the Obama administration’s only workplace raid.  Then they were given work permits and told they could stay in the USA while their employer was prosecuted…

Now, the more than 2 dozen undocumented workers arrested during the February raid are again facing deportation.

The deportations and likely removals are a conclusion to a case that displeased both advocates for illegal immigrants and those who lobby for stricter immigration enforcement.

In this case – the company, the workers and even the Seattle US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office that conducted the raid came in for some sort of punishment or special scrutiny

Shortly following the raid, ICE officials traded urgent emails going over Q&A sent by an apparently miffed White House, according to emails obtained by the AP through a federal records request.

In all, 27 workers have been deported; 7 have been allowed to leave the country voluntarily and 15 await court dates with an immigration judge, said ICE spokeswoman Lorie Dankers.

Read more

Immigration Impact reports today, the United States Supreme Court opens its October session. Among the cases it will hear this term, two may have a significant effect on immigrants. The first case involves the intersection of the criminal justice system and immigration and the important role that lawyers play in safeguarding the rights of immigrants. The second case deals with immigrants’ access to federal court review—review which provides necessary oversight of government decision-making in immigration cases. These cases present the Supreme Court with opportunities to reaffirm that immigrants must be afforded fair process and a meaningful opportunity to be heard.

For a summary of the cases, refer to the above link.

American Apparel, with a vast garment factory in downtown Los Angeles, is firing about 1,800 immigrant employees in the coming days — more than a quarter of its work force — after a federal investigation turned up irregularities in the identity documents the workers presented when they were hired.

The firings at the company, American Apparel, have become a showcase for the Obama administration’s effort to reduce illegal immigration by forcing employers to dismiss unauthorized workers rather than by using workplace raids. The firings, however, have divided opinion in California over the effects of the new approach, especially at a time of high joblessness in the state and with a major, well-regarded employer as a target.

The investigation at American Apparel was started 17 months ago, under President George W. Bush. Obama administration officials point out that they have not followed the Bush pattern of concluding such investigations with a mass roundup of workers. Those raids drew criticism for damaging businesses and dividing immigrant families. For more on this, we link to the NY Times article.

The Obama administration is expanding a program initiated by President George W. Bush aimed at checking the immigration status of virtually everyone booked into local jails.  By matching fingerprints to federal immigration databases, they hope to pinpoint deportable illegal immigrants before they are released from custody.

For more on this story