The employer will receive a SSA TNC when the:

1. Name, SS# or date of birth is incorrect in SSA records
2. Name change was not reported to SSA
3. Citizenship or immigration status was not updated with SSA
4. SS record contains another type of error

The employer will receive a DHS TNC when the:

1. Name, A# and/or I-94 number are incorrect in DHS records
2. Information was not updated in the employee’s DHS records
3. Citizenship or immigration status changed
4. Record contains another type of error
5. ID photograph differs from the photograph in DHS records

• The employer informs the employee and prints and reviews the TNC
• The employee chooses to “contest” or “not contest” the TNC
• Refer the employee to the appropriate agency if the TNC is contested
• The employee has 8 Federal Government workdays from the date of referral to visit or call the appropriate agency to resolve the discrepancy.
• Employee continues to work while the case is being resolved
• Once resolved, they should inform the employer
• With both a SSA TNC and a DHS TNC, a response is electronically sent to the employer through the system.  The employer should check E-Verify periodically for the response

TNC Case Resolution

• The employer will receive one of three results:

Employment Authorized |  Final Non-confirmation  |  Review/Update Employee Data then Resubmit

At least two dozen employees were arrested March 4th after deputies raided four Pei Wei restaurants and its corporate headquarters in Scottsdale.  Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio had warrants for 120 employees who were suspected of identity theft.

Just how bad can it get?  Unfortunately pretty bad.  At the corporate headquarters, boxes of documents and computer databases were seized.  Arpaio said the investigation began in June 2010 after the sheriff’s office received a tip that several employees were illegal immigrants.  The investigation showed that most of the victims whose identities may have been stolen live out of state; eight of them are children under the age of 12 and four of them are dead.

Arpaio stated, “That’s one thing that makes this operation unusual. People apparently are fed up with the ID theft problem and the problems ID theft causes and are willing to help law enforcement to ensure the successful prosecution of this kind of crime.”

Pei Wei Asian Diners are operated by publicly held P.F. Chang’s China Bistro Inc   P.F. Chang’s operates about 170 Pei Wei locations nationwide and more than 200 P.F. Chang’s China Bistros.

It is estimated that a Pei Wei restaurant can generate up to $2 mil/year in sales.  The prolonged closure of a number of locations is costing the company a significant amount of money and the media coverage is tremendously damaging including a loss of prestige and community standing.

The case at hand teaches a lesson about the E-Verify program, in that using E-Verify doesn’t insulate an employer against penalties and doesn’t provide a safe harbor against worksite enforcement. This is a wake-up call to anyone who thinks E-Verify is an effective remedy to stop identity fraud.  E-Verify doesn’t have the proper protections and safeguards in place for detecting it.

Secondly, if you own and operate a chain of restaurants, it’s time to be proactive and get your I-9’s in order and secure the services of a 3^rd party audit team who are skilled in handling employer compliance issues.  You must carefully review your systems and procedures around I-9 processing and management at all of your locations, particularly if you are a multi-site employer – including corporate headquarters.

For more on this story.

The owner of a Southern California furniture manufacturing company, Brownwood Furniture located in Rancho Cucamonga, has been sentenced to 10 months in federal prison for knowingly hiring illegal immigrants and six months for continuing to employ illegal aliens.  The sentences will be served concurrently.  In addition to the prison terms, he was ordered to pay a $15,000 fine.

Prosecutors say 57-year-old Brownwood Furniture owner Rick Vartanian was told earlier that 61 of his 73 workers at the facility were illegal immigrants and had submitted invalid documents to obtain their jobs.  In November 2009, Vartanian told U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents that the illegal immigrants no longer worked for Brownwood Furniture, but investigators discovered 18 illegal immigrants were still working for him.  Vartanian, who was convicted of obstruction of justice and employing illegal immigrants, was sentenced Monday by a Los Angeles federal judge.

Brownwood Furniture vice president Michael Patrick Eberly pleaded guilty to employing illegal immigrants and he was placed on a years’ probation and fined $10,000.

The charges against the defendants stem from an investigation that began after ICE HSI received an anonymous tip that Brownwood furniture was using unauthorized labor. An audit of the company’s hiring records in July 2009 revealed that 61 of the firm’s 73 employees had submitted invalid documents to obtain their jobs. After ICE HSI notified the company about the discrepancies, the executives told investigators the unauthorized workers had been terminated. However, when ICE HSI agents executed a search warrant at the business in Dec. 2009, they encountered 30 unauthorized workers, 18 of whom had purportedly been terminated following the July audit.

These sentences make very clear that employers who knowingly hire unauthorized workers, face seriously dire consequences.

Should you require the services of an expert team of employer compliance specialists, please contact our office to discuss your situation and visit our I-9 Employer Compliance Resource Center:  www.I-9Audits.com

Bloomberg News on 1/27/2011 released the findings of its report on a proposal to require every U.S. employer to use E-Verify to confirm the legal status of all new hires.  The report  revealed that businesses with less than 500 employees would undoubtedly bear the greatest burden, spending about $2.6 billion a year to use the government’s “free” web-based program, compared with less than $100 million for the 4% that used it in 2010.

A study conducted in December 2010 by Westat that was commissioned by the government as part of a multi-year evaluation of the E-Verify program represents the result of their 2009 findings of a nationwide survey of 511 respondents that encompassed nonusers (companies that have never signed a Memorandum of Understanding) to participate in E-Verify, focus groups of nonusers, surveys of users, and interviews with employees that received TNC’s (Tentative Non-Confirmations).

The primary finding of the survey and the principal barrier to participation in E-Verify appears to be a lack of awareness of the Program. Among the case study participants, 63 percent were not familiar with E-Verify. Case study participants were often positive about the characteristics of E-Verify, and among the 101 who answered a question concerning their future plans, 23 percent definitely planned to participate in E-Verify in the future (while 32 percent would not participate unless mandated to do so).

For those employers who have heard of E-Verify, the information often came from professional associations, media outlets and government materials or publications.

The other primary reasons for not participating were not perceiving a benefit from participating, and thinking it would be too costly or time-consuming to participate.  The perception of burden is based in part on employers’ negative experiences with other government Internet-based programs (such as the Social Security Administration/Business Services Online Website).

Large employers were much more likely to be familiar with E-Verify than small employers. A majority of large employers in the case study (56 percent) were familiar with E-Verify, compared with 29 percent of medium-sized employers and 17 percent of small employers.

The case study participants supported many program changes to E-Verify, with the most popular including the increased use of technology to identify fraudulent documents and to verify identity, allowing a formal appeal by an employer and/or employee of a final case finding, and allowing verification of job applicants before a job decision is made.

Some participants who decided not to use the program did so because they did not perceive any benefit in using it compared to the cost, the manpower, training and the logistics required to use the program.  Others were not using it because they felt that it was a government priority rather than a business priority.  Some felt that it wasn’t their responsibility to control illegal immigration and that it should be the government’s responsibility.

One insightful response came from a business owner who stated, “Hold me, personally, and my company harmless from any loopholes in the system that become exploited by the undocumented population . . . bottom line . . . I don’t want to make the 5 o’clock news by complying with a broken system.”

In summary, E-Verify is not perfect – it doesn’t identify identity theft issues, but it is immigration compliance best practice and should carefully be considered and the pro’s and con’s discussed with an immigration attorney that is informed and specializes in employer compliance issues prior to enrollment.

We link to the Westat Study here.  More on E-Verify Strengths and Weaknesses

We link to our I-9 Employer Compliance Resource Center here.

One of Mississippi’s most successful and largest private employers pled guilty in federal court last week to knowingly violating federal criminal conspiracy laws in its employment of illegal aliens at the company’s electrical transformer plant in Laurel, MS following an investigation by ICE and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI).  The company agreed to pay a $2.5 million fine, which is larger than normal for such a conviction, the U.S. Justice Department said in a news release.

Immigration agents detained more than 600 illegal immigrants at Howard Industries’ electrical transformer plant during a massive raid on Aug. 25, 2008. Those detained in the raid came from countries including Brazil, El Salvador, Germany, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama and Peru, and most of them were deported, though a few were convicted on identity theft charges for using fraudulent documents and providing fake papers to other workers.

The company said in a statement that it was pleased to resolve the investigation “based on the actions of its former human resources manager Jose Humberto Gonzalez.”  Gonzalez is the only company executive who has been charged in the case. He pled guilty in December 2009 to conspiracy and admitted that he hired hundreds of people who he knew were in the country illegally.  

The company had repeatedly denied allegations that it had knowingly hired individuals without work authorization, putting all of the blame on its HR manager, Jose Humberto Gonzalez, who was charged in a 25-count indictment with conspiracy and employee verification fraud.   He faces a maximum of 5 years of imprisonment on the conspiracy charge and on each employee verification fraud count. He also faces a minimum of 2 years imprisonment for the aggravated identity theft charge and possible fines up to $250,000.

Howard Industries was charged with knowingly and willfully conspiring to encourage and induce undocumented workers to reside in the US, and knowingly conspiring to conceal, harbor and shield from detection such workers.  As it turned out, Howard Industries waived indictment and agreed to plead guilty to the one-count felony of  conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud the United States which calls for a term of not less than one and not more than 5 years of probation and a fine of up to $500,000. However, this fine was substantially enhanced to $2.5 million due to the nature of the crime (harboring), the number of workers involved (100 or more), and the size of the company.

Apparently Gonzalez would routinely hire unauthorized workers who presented false identity documents, including green-cards and Social Security cards, and then would complete the I-9 with the fake information.  Gonzalez was also accused of submitting SSNs to the Social Security Administration to verify their numbers and then disregarding the results if they came back as invalid.

E-Verify doesn’t protect against identify fraud: Howard Industries was using E-Verify and ran every applicant through the system, but E-Verify doesn’t detect identify fraud and shouldn’t be used as a substitute for I-9 compliance.  The case at hand teaches a lesson about the E-Verify program, in that using E-Verify doesn’t insulate an employer against penalties and doesn’t provide a safe harbor against worksite enforcement.

So what’s an employer to do?

If you are contemplating ‘going electronic’, whether that be an electronic I-9 system or enrolling in the E-Verify program, it is imperative that you find out what condition your I-9’s are in.  This is done by having a qualified immigration attorney that specializes in compliance issues perform either a partial or full audit on your I-9’s so that the reoccurring errors and violations buried in your paperwork can be identified, corrected, and your staff properly trained.  We additionally encourage our clients to work with us in establishing policies and guidelines as to how they want to process and manage the I-9 function at their organization and document this, and make sure that everyone involved with the process is trained and fully understands your internal policies.

We link to the ICE press release

For more information on our employer compliance services and solutions

February 16, 2011, Brett Dreyer, Chief of the Worksite Enforcement, Unit of Homeland Security Investigations, verified on 2/16/2011 that ICE continues to focus its investigations both on businesses that were brought to their attention by tips and leads, and on those that work in areas of national security and critical infrastructure. Mr. Dreyer further confirmed: “The agency continues to be interested in egregious employers as they tend to break other laws in addition to immigration…including paying employees under the table, avoiding taxes and ignoring employee protections. The inspections will touch on employers of all sizes and in every state in the nation — no one industry is being targeted nor is any one industry immune from scrutiny.”

Confirmation has been publicized that NOI’s were indeed served throughout the USA on February 17^th.  The audits are expected to be completed within the next 2-3 months. We link here for more on this story.

This is a good time to review what you should do if you are served with a Notice of Inspection (NOI):

• Immediately contact Immigration Solutions and company management
• Employers are allowed by law 3 days notice to respond by producing the I-9 records of their active as well as terminated employees within a particular period of time

The NOI will be most probably be accompanied by a very invasive Document Subpoena that might ask for all of some of the below items:  

• A copy of your I-9 Policy and Procedures Statement or Manual
• I-9 forms for current employees hired after 11/6/1986
• I-9 forms for terminated employees within the required retention period
• Complete employee lists of current and terminated employees
• Quarterly Wage and hour reports
• Payroll Summaries
• SSA Mismatch correspondence
• E-Verify and/or SSNVS documents
• Business information such as:  Employer ID number, owner’s SSN/address, business license, etc.

We work with our clients to create compliant workforces, and now is the time to be proactive if you absolutely know that you have problems with your I-9 forms; and, by the way, most employers do.  We encourage you to be proactive and take action now before you pay the high price of being put in a position where your options have diminished.

We are happy to hear from you and are very flexible with our package of compliance services and solutions.  Our talented team is read to assist you with whatever you’d like to accomplish with your compliance programs.  Visit our I-9 Resource Center here.

If you’d like to listen to this news Blog via podcast, you can do so here:

E-Verify Self Check

The USCIS Self-Check Initiative will go into effect on March 18, 2011 and will permit individuals to check their work authorization status prior to being hired and to enter data into the E-Verify system that might be reflected in federal databases to ensure that the information relating to their eligibility to work is correct and up to date.  This will lead to a more  reliable and accurate E-Verify system that works better for both employers and employees.

How does Self-Check work?

E-Verify self check uses a Web-based interface that will be accessible to all individuals and is a free, voluntary service offered by the government to provide information to the user about his/her employment eligibility in the USA.  The user will not need to register or open an account, but will be required to agree to the “Terms of Use” and restrictions on usage (you may only run a self check on your own information) detailed on the E-Verify Self-Check website before granted access.

The information collected will only be used to:

• Confirm the identity of the user and
• Confirmation of work authorization

The user will be asked to confirm their current work authorization status and to enter minimal biographic information (name, address, date of birth, the social security number is optional).

After the information is submitted it is authenticated by a 3^rd party Identify Assurance Service that will generate 2 and 4 questions that only the user can answer.  If the user is unable to answer a question or the databases of available information from public records, financial institutions and other available records are insufficient, the user’s identify will not be authenticated and the user will be unable to advance to the next step and complete usage of the system. In this event, none of the information entered is provided to or retained by E-Verify Self-Check.  The system does retain, however, a transaction number, the reason for failure, the date and time of the transaction and the error code.

Once the user’s identity has been authenticated, they can then run an employment eligibility query to determine their work eligibility status.  The biographic information that was provided will pre-populate (and cannot be changed) and additional information will be requested that is identical to the information and documentation required for the I-9 form. Following this step, one of three results can occur:

1)  Confirmation of Work Authorization

2)   Possible SSA mis-match information; and

3)  Possible immigration information mis-match

The user is then asked if they wish to resolve the issue if 2 & 3 above are received.  With an SSA mis-match, the system generates a form with their name and biographic information along with the E-Verify Case Number with detailed instructions as to how to resolve the issue  If the issue is immigration related, the system provides instructions to contact E-Verify Customer Service to assist in the correction of their immigration records within 72 hours after the inquiry to speak with a status verification representative.  If the user’s record cannot be corrected by the representative, the user will be advised of further actions required to resolve their immigration mis-match.

Confirming Work Authorization Without Identity

If an individual is unable to authenticate through the IdP but wants to determine work authorization status prior to hire, USCIS will provide information on how to visit a Social Security Administration field office, access Social Security yearly statements, call USCIS, or submit a Freedom of Information Act/ Privacy Act request to access work authorization records. The individual will also be advised to check the information at the various credit bureaus and through a free credit check website.

Conclusion

With the self check program, workers will be able to use E-Verify in much the same way as employers, except that workers will need to take extra steps to verify their own identity.  It will alleviate much of the administrative burdens that fall on employers who receive an E-Verify non-tentative confirmation of an employee’s work eligibility, since the new tool should allow employees to identify and resolve verification problems before they begin a new job.

Resources

For more information on E-Verify, visit USCIS’  E-Verify homepage.

E-Verify Employee Rights and  Responsibilities

For those of you who might rather listen to our news than read it, we are releasing a podcast of a previous Blog post on the topic of the I-9 Revised Employer Handbook that was released by USCIS last month that provides additional guidance on many of the most frequently asked questions that we see in our employer compliance practice.  Have a listen and please take our Survey.   For a list of our compliance services and solutions we link here.

Last week the House subcommittee on immigration policy and enforcement held their first hearing on “ICE Worksite Enforcement – Up to the Job?” The major agenda item was whether or not Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) was adequately enforcing worksite immigration laws.  The Republican members called upon ;their usual sources to diminish the Obama administration’s enforcement efforts, even though Deputy Director of ICE, Kumar Kibble stated quite clearly that ICE has achieved record numbers of investigations, audits, fines, and deportations by citing the below  statistics.  Frankly, after listening to the majority members, one can’t help but wonder if any amount of enforcement would be sufficient to meet their expectations.

Under the Obama administration, ICE has moved  away from raids, and stepped  up the pace of auditing businesses who may be suspect to employing undocumented workers.  However, the emphasis today is more on employers who hire immigrants and not just arresting undocumented immigrants who are working in the factories, the hotels, restaurants and construction businesses.  The vehicle being used to police the workforce is the auditing of I-9 forms,  levying fines and utilizing employer verification tools such as E-Verify and the Ice Mutual Agreement Between the Government and Employers Program.

The Deputy Director cited the following statistics as evidence of the success of ICE’s worksite enforcement: for FY 2010:

• A record 2,746 worksite enforcement investigations, more than doubling the 1,191 cases initiated in FY 2008.
• ICE criminally arrested 196 employers for worksite related violation, surpassing the previous high of 135 in FY 2008.
• ICE also issued a record 2,196 notices of inspection to employers, surpassing the prior year’s record of 1,444 and more than quadrupling the 503 inspections in 2008.
• ICE issued 237 final orders – documents requiring employers to cease violation the law and directing them to pay fines – totaling $6,956,026, compared to the 18 issued for $675,209 in FY 2008.
• The total of $6,956,026 last year represents the most final orders issued since the creation of ICE in 2003.
• In addition worksite investigations resulted in a record $36,611,320 in judicial fines, forfeitures, and restitutions.
• Finally ice brought a new level of integrity to the contracting process by debarring a record 97 businesses and 49 individuals preventing unscrupulous companies from engaging in future business with the government.

The glaring facts that came out of the hearing are that no matter whether it’s worksite raids or company audits with deportations of undocumented aliens, the current state of how foreign born workers are processed into the country is no longer working.  The conversation that we all should be having is the comprehensive reform of how workers are brought into the USA.  We can only hope that the GOP and the Democrats can have civil and reasonable debate that results in meaningful change.  Let’s see what happens.

Our January 2011 newsletter with I-9 and E-Verify updates and US and Canadian immigration news is now available.

If you haven’t had a look at our I-9 Employer Resource Center, please take a minute to do so, fill out the Survey and send it along to us:  www.I-9Audits.com