Through a recently leaked memorandum to the public, it was revealed that  Immigration Services fraud prevention officers have been urged to check social networking websites such as MySpace, Facebook, Classmates, amongst others, when investigating cases.

The memo is directed at officers of USCIS’ Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate (FDNS), a unit of the agency that investigates pending and approved immigration petitions to verify the information in those petitions.

The memo suggests that its agents attempt to “friend” citizenship petitioners and their beneficiaries on social networks in the hope that these users allow agents to monitor their activities for evidence of suspected fraud, including evidence that their relationships might not live up to the USCIS’ standard of a legitimate marriage.

The presumptions in the memorandum concerning those that participate in social networking websites are quite disconcerting.  Additionally, there is no mention whether or not DHS agents are required to reveal their government affiliation or their real name during the friend request while monitoring activities, leaving open the possibility that agents could actively deceive online users wile monitoring the websites.

A word to the wise should be sufficient. We urge those who are going through the immigration process to use discretion in what they share about their particular situations in chat rooms and social networking websites.

ICE announced today the launch of its newly redesigned website, ICE.gov. The new website features the latest ICE news information and an enhanced media/image gallery. The new ICE.gov also includes in depth information about the ICE Office of Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and the ICE Office of Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO).

The new site also features ICE’s Online Detainee Locator System (ODLS), a public, Internet-based tool, designed to assist family members, attorneys and other interested parties in locating detained aliens in ICE custody. The ODLS was launched on July 23, 2010.

We are seeing with  increasing frequency, particularly in the hospitality, restaurant and contracting industries, the collaboration between the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD) and ICE concerning the recent rash of I-9 audits and work site investigations.  We think this is for a myriad of reasons:

1)      Not meeting employee minimum wage requirements

2)      Non-conformance with H-2B temporary labor certification regulations

3)      Mis-classifying workers as independent contractors

4)      Hiring undocumented workers

5)      I-9 document violations; and

6)      A high volume of uncontested E-Verify Non-confirmations

In September a meeting took place between immigration attorneys and representatives from the USCIS Verification Division to discuss updates with E-Verify.  It was discussed that The Office of Special Counsel and E-Verify have signed an MOU to share information  between the two agencies, enabling the OSC to increase its role in the enforcement of E-Verify policies, specifically related to discrimination and employer use of the E-Verify system.

E-Verify is particularly monitoring employers that are suspected of misusing the system for pre-screening purposes or who appear to be providing data that is inconsistent with the size of their business and their usage of the E-Verify system.

If you’re an employer and you receive a Notice of Inspection (NOI) or a Subpoena, it is highly advisable that you contact an attorney that specializes in employer compliance issues before you provide any documentation whatsoever to ICE agents, DHS, or DOL.

For more information on E-Verify, we link to the Quick Reference Guide for E-Verify Employer Agents and to the E-Verify menu on the USCIS website.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Immigration Solutions provides US and global visa services to individuals and employers throughout the USA and abroad.  We specialize in business immigration and have a depth of experience in the IT, health care, arts & entertainment, and sports industries, amongst others.  Our services include complex business visas for investors, multinational managers, skilled professionals and outstanding individuals in science, business, education, athletics and entertainment.  We additionally provide employer compliance consulting services on proper I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification) auditing, training, and work with our clients to develop compliant immigration policies and procedures.  We offer these services, as well, to government contractors and advise on FAR E-Verify enrollment and compliance issues.

Senate Dems Robert Menendez (NJ) and Patrick Leahy (VT) introduced the CIR Act of 2010 that proposes major  overhaul to the immigration system, making changes in employment and family-based programs with enhancements to I-9 (employment eligibility verification) employer obligations.  Most feel that this will not be the avenue by which CIR is accomplished, but that many of its ideas, including those int the CIR ASAP Bill that was introduced by Luis Gutierrez (D/IL) and the REPAIR proposal introduced by Senators Schumer (D-NY) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) earlier this year, will all be considered when Congress decides to get serious about tackling immigration reform and actually start debating the issues.

The Bill does propose the creation of an Immigration Commission that would have authority to recommend yearly NIV and IV numerical limits.

The Bill proposes changes to the H-1B program by requiring employers to post the job opening on a new DOL website.  Employer with 50 or more employees would be prohibited from petitioning for additional H-1B workers if their workforce was comprised of more than 50% H-1B and L-1 workers, excluding those who are the beneficiaries of a pending or approved labor certification or employer-based immigrant petition.  Additionally, employers would be prohibited from placing H-1B workers at a 3rd party site, unless the worker was primarily supervised and controlled by the petitioner/employer.

DOL would be charged with additional authority to review LCA’s for fraud or misrepresentation and would have up to 14 days to certify an LCA (makes one wonder if we’d ever get a case out the door!)  with additional authority to investigate complaints against H-1B employers and to conduct employer H-1B compliance audits.  This is yet another reminder to employers to make sure that their Public Access Files are in order and that they are working with immigration attorneys who provide them with PAF files and overall compliance guidance and training.

Proposed changes to the L-1 Program would include requiring employers to offer L-1 employees insurance and other benefits on the same basis as that offered to US workers.  Increasing restrictions would be imposed on “new office” L-1 petitions and would require DHS to submit a report to Congress on L-1Blanket use.  On the positive side, the bill wold provide some relief for small employers seeking L-1A status for foreign nationals.  It would forbid adjudicators from using the small size of an L-1 employer as a negative factor in executive or managerial eligibility for L-1A status, but would increase DHS authority to investigate complaints against L-1 employers and impose new penalties upon employers who violate L-1 regs.

*** (Relief for Registered Nurses) *** — The Bill proposes to create a new H-2C temporary, nonimmigrant visa for occupations for which there is a shortage of American labor.  The initial H-2C visa would be valid for three years and renewed for three more years. With some exceptions, an H-2C visa could be revoked if the visa holder has been unemployed for more than 60 days.  After 4 years, an H-2C non-immigrant may file an application for adjustment of status, provided that he/she has been continuously employed, establishes progress toward civics and English proficiency, meets all criminal and other background checks and pays additional fines and fees.

There is a proposal to include a new H-1C program for lesser-skilled workers with job offers from US employers, and the creation of a premium processing program for administrative appeals of employment-based immigrant petition denials.

Relief for Undocumented Immigrants: Creates a provisional legal status, Lawful Prospective Immigrant (LPI), for undocumented immigrants who are present in the U.S. as of September 30, 2010, register with the government, have never committed a serious crime, and are otherwise admissible to the United States.  LPI status will be initially valid for four years, with the possibility of extensions.  LPI status confers work and travel authorization.  After six years in LPI/LPID status, an applicant may apply to become a lawful permanent resident, provided he or she continues to meet all eligibility requirements, including renewed biometrics and background and security checks, and also establishes basic citizenship and English skills, payment of all taxes, and compliance with Selective Service registration.

Employment-based Immigrant Petitions: The bill would recapture unused employment and family-based visa numbers from 1992 to 2007, and implement for future years  that unusued immigrant visa numbers roll over each fiscal year including the base amount of 140,000 –  plus numbers from 1992-2007 – and any unusued numbers from the previous year.  Those with approved visa petitions who are subject to wait times would be eligible to apply for AOS upon payment of an additional $500 filing fee and would be entitled to 3-year EADs and travel documents.  Those with pending immigrant visa petitions would be eligible to apply for AOS at the discretion of DHS.

We link to a complete summary of the CIR Reform Act from Immigration Policy Center.

Immigration Solutions will continue to update and report on any and all CIR issues as they arise.

The Obama administration has been holding behind-the-scenes talks to determine whether the Department of Homeland Security can unilaterally grant legal status on a mass basis to illegal immigrants, a former Bush administration official who spoke with at least three people involved in those talks told FoxNews.com on 6/21/10.

The issue was raised publicly by eight Republican senators who wrote to the White House last week to complain that they had heard the administration was readying a “Plan B” in case a comprehensive immigration reform bill cannot win enough support to clear Congress.

The White House has neither confirmed or denied this claim.  It’s unclear what section of the illegal immigrant population such a move would target. But the former Bush official said the discussions are real.

“The administration at the very minimum is studying legal ways to legalize people without having to go through any congressional debate about it,” the source said, calling the senators’ claim credible. “Whether somebody pulls the trigger on that, that’s another issue.”

The senators — Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa; Orrin Hatch, R-Utah; David Vitter, R-La.; Jim Bunning, R-Ky.; Saxby Chambliss, Ga.; Johnny Isakson, R-Ga.; and James Inhofe, R-Okla  — claimed in their letter that the administration was looking at extending what is known as deferred action or parole to millions of illegal aliens in the United States.

For more on this story

ICE has filed a 60-day notice for a new information collection application with the OMB (Office of Management and Budget) for their IMAGE Program (ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers) that is the education component of the Office of Investigations (OI) Worksite Enforcement program.  The Notice is available here.  Comments will be accepted for 60 days until August 10, 2010, and should be sent to the person named in the Notice.

In an article published on ILW.com on the subject, the author states:

In July of 2006, ICE announced two measures billed as “voluntary partnerships with the government.” The first is a list of what the agency considers to be “Best Hiring Practices.” The second is a voluntary program entitled the “ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers,” also referred to as IMAGE , which it has been working on since at least July of 2005. The government is actively promoting these programs to employers.

What are considered Best Hiring practices?

As part of the ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers, the (IMAGE) program, DHS recommends the following “best hiring practices” as follows:

• Use E-Verify to verify the employment eligibility of all new hires.
• Use the Social Security Number Verification Service (SSNVS) and make a good-faith effort to correct and verify the names and Social Security numbers of the current workforce.
• Establish a written hiring and employment eligibility verification policy (I-9 policy)
• Establish an internal compliance and training program related to the hiring and employment verification process, including completion of the I-9 form, how to detect the fraudulent use of documents in the verification process, and how to use E-Verify and SSNVS.  Require the I-9 and E-Verify process to be conducted only by an individual who has received appropriate training, and include a secondary review as part of each employee’s verification “to minimize the potential for a single individual to subvert the process.”
• Arrange for annual I-9 audits by an external auditing firm or a trained employee not otherwise involved in the I-9 process.
• Establish a procedure to report to ICE credible information of suspected criminal misconduct in the employment eligibility verification process.
• Establish a program to assess subcontractors’ compliance with employment eligibility verification requirements. Encourage contractors to incorporate IMAGE Best Practices and when practicable incorporate the verification requirements in subcontractor agreements.
• Establish a protocol for responding to letters received from federal and state government agencies indicating that there is a discrepancy between the agency’s information and the information provided by the employer or employee (for example, “no-match” letters received from the Social Security Administration).
• Establish a tip line mechanism (e.g., inbox, e-mail) for employees to report activity relating to the employment of unauthorized workers, and a protocol for responding to employee tips.
• Establish and maintain appropriate policies, practices, and safeguards against use of the verification process for unlawful discrimination, and to ensure that U.S. citizens and authorized workers do not face discrimination with respect to hiring, firing, or recruitment or referral for a fee because of citizenship status or national origin.
• Maintain copies of any documents accepted as proof of identity and/or employment authorization for all new hires.

Note:  It is important to notice that some of these points listed above have critical content.  We link to the ILW.com excellent analysis of Best Practices and the IMAGE program for employers to carefully consider prior to enrolling in these programs.

Should you require further assistance or consultation regarding these programs, please contact our office.

In a Press Release today, DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano, announced the elimination of the paper arrival/departure form (Form I-94W) for authorized travelers from nations participating in the Visa Waiver Program (VWP).

The elimination of the paper I-94W form enables travelers to provide basic biographical, travel and eligibility information automatically through ESTA prior to departure for the United States —reducing redundancy and enhancing the security of sensitive personal information, as CBP stores and protects all VWP data electronically on secure servers.

CBP recommends that travelers submit ESTA applications as soon as an applicant begins making travel plans. ESTA applications may be submitted at any time prior to travel, and once approved, will be valid for two years or until the applicant’s passport expires. To date, CBP has received more than 19 million ESTA applications from citizens of VWP countries—applications that will now automatically cover I-94W submission.

For more information about ESTA, please visit www.cbp.gov

As reported by ImmigrationImpact.com

This month marks the 7th anniversary of the DHS which is home to the nation’s three immigration agencies (ICE, CBP and USCIS).  It also marks the end of a sweeping internal review ordered by DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano which has not been made public.

The Immigration Policy Center has released a report entitled DHS Progress Report: The Challenge of Reform to assess the 1st year of the Obama Administration’s immigration policy.

On the plus side, there has been more public engagement and discussion of DHS priorities. ICE has announced, although not fully implemented, numerous detention reforms. It has done away with the massive worksite raids of the past few years, placing greater emphasis on employer violations. The Obama Administration and USCIS have made some genuine inroads into immigration fee reform, backlog reduction, and expanded naturalization and integration efforts. Secretary Napolitano has also invested significant time and resources into developing plans for comprehensive immigration reform.

These are just some of the examples of changes within the last year. Ultimately, this first year was mostly frustrating—a year where the promise of reform seems to fight daily with the dynamics of an entrenched belief in an enforcement driven culture. For every two steps forward, it seems that the Department takes one steps backward.

It has been reported that today President Obama is scheduled to meet with two key congressional players in the movement for immigration reform—Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Sen. Lindsay Graham (R-SC)—who are working together behind the scenes to draft a bipartisan immigration bill. The President is expected to ask the Senators to produce a reform bill blueprint that “could be turned into legislative language.” Some think that the meeting is another positive signal from the White House, and others view it as a “last-ditch effort in an election year.” Although interpretations are mixed, a spokesman for the White House affirmed that the President is still committed to reforming our immigration system.  More on this

In light of the recent controversial USCIS 19-page January 8, 2010 memo where USCIS takes a very strident and restrictive position on staffing agencies as employer/petitioners, we find it particularly disconcerting to learn that there are 200,000 contract employees working at the DHS, more than the 188,000 “civilian” workforce.

In a letter sent to the agency’s Secretary Janet Napolitano, Lieberman and Collins said the figure “raises the question of whether DHS itself is in charge of its programs and policies, or whether it inappropriately has ceded core decisions to contractors.”

Napolitano is slated to appear before the Senate committee and is expected to face questions on the subject. The senators want a unit-by-unit breakdown of where in Homeland Security the contractors are working and have asked for assurances that contractors are not performing “inherently governmental work.”

Clark Stevens, a spokesman for Homeland Security, told CNN Tuesday that “Secretary Napolitano has been strongly committed to decreasing the department’s reliance on contractors and strengthening the federal work force” at Homeland Security.

“Over the past year, we have been actively converting contractor positions to government positions and will continue to build on these efforts at an even more aggressive pace this year. We are working across the department to identify and make additional conversions as quickly as possible while sustaining the work force required to carry out our critical mission,” Stevens said.

How ironic could this possibly be?!  We will keep you posted.  For the story on CNN

There’s been alot of chatter today about the introduction of Rep. Gutierrez’ (D-IL) immigration bill that is called Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America’s Safety and Protection (CIR ASAP).

Yesterday, Rep. Gutierrez stated, “We have waited patiently for a workable solution to our immigration crisis to be taken up by this Congress and our President.  The time for waiting is over.”

To address some of the key points:

Backlog Reduction: This would be  a recapture of unused employment-based visas from  previous years (1992 – 2008) with an allowance for future unused visas to roll over the next year; exempting spouses and children from the annual cap; increasing the country quotas; the ability to file for AOS (adjustment of status; i.e. green-cards) before a visa number is available by paying a fee of $500, even thought a visa cannot be issued until a visa number is available.  This does, however, allow for work authorization, travel authorization and maintenance of status.

Employment Verification: Would make E-Verify work verification mandatory for all employers by phasing in current employees and new hires; would impose additional pealties on employers’ failure to follow the E-Verify program.

H-1B and L-1 Nonimmigrant Visas: Would impose requirements on employers to recruit US workers before applying for an H-1B and would increa3se penalties for H-1B violations.  Would create penalties for L-1 violations.

The Undocumented: Would create a 6-year ‘conditional’ non-immigrant status for undocumented (illegal) foreign nationals in the USA.  This would include work authorization and travel authorization; would waive unlawful presence bars and provide a path to permanent residence (green-card) and citizenship.

The Immigration Policy Center has an excellent 6-page more detailed review of the bill which we link to.

AILA applauded the introduction of Rep. Gutierrez’ Bill and stated, “We know how dedicated Rep. gutierrez is to immigration reform,” commented Bernie Wolfsdorf, president of AILA.  “Gutierrez has long been a strong and vocal leader in the CIR movement.  We look forward to analyzing this new CIR bill and hope to work with him and other members of Congress to fix our nation’s dysfunctional immigration system and help spur the country back to economic recovery.”

AILA further stated:  Already, the Congressional Progressive Caucus, the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus and members of the Congressional Black Caucus have endorsed the bill as a solution to both stem illegal immigration and promote legal migration that will protect and strengthen our nation’s economic and national security.

Gutierrez explained at his press conference yesterday that the Senate will still take the lead on debating immigration reform with a bill to be introduced by Sen Charles Schumer (D-NY), Chair of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration.  Janet Napolitano (DHS Secretary) has indicated that they have provided extensive technical assistance to Schumer and his staff as they draft the bill that is predicted to be introduced early 2010.

We will continue to report on any and all news and progress on the immigration reform front.

If you’re interested in more reading….Homeland Security Today NY Times ABC News The Hill