Senator Schumer issues a game plan that he thinks will get a CIR bill passed.

We link to the ILW.com article.

Schedule A Nurse Visas: Improving the Processing

In a very promising development, on December 5, 2008 the Office of the Citizenship and Immigration Services Ombudsman published it recommendations as to how to improve the processing of Schedule A nurse cases and delivered the 11-page Report to Congress on Monday, December 8, 2008. 

The recommendations are based on a recent nationwide teleconference conducted by the Ombudsman at which Immigration Solutions was present. Immigration Solutions has obtained an advance copy of the report which can be accessed here.

Those of you who have read the monthly newsletters and periodic newsflashes published by Immigration Solutions and who have participated in teleconferences presented by Immigration Solutions, will readily recognize that the report repeats and reinforces everything that Immigration Solutions has discussed and presented over the past few years.

The attached report, while specifically providing recommendations for improving the processing of Schedule A nurse cases, should also be required reading for all persons active in the field of recruiting foreign nurses to the United States. 

The report provides an excellent history of the issues and discusses the effect of the nurse shortage in the United States.  It explains the limited nonimmigrant visa options available to nurses (TN, H-1B and H-1C).  Specifically, the report provides statistics of how few H-1B nurse cases have been approved recently (38 cases in 2006, 66 cases in 2007 and only 136 in 2008).  In addition, the report discusses the immigrant visa process for nurses through Schedule A and the two main problems with that process, i.e., the delays at USCIS in processing the I-140 visa petition and the immigrant visa quota delays.  We note that the report references the fact that one of the Service Centers charged with adjudicating Schedule A casework is some 4 months behind what the Processing Report presently indicates.

The Ombudsman concludes the report with the following recommendations:

• That USCIS separate and prioritize Schedule A green card nurse applications so that they can be expedited upon immigrant visa availability.
• That USCIS centralize Schedule A nurse applications at one designated USCIS service center to facilitate more efficient and consistent processing of Schedule A applications.
• That USCIS regularly communicate with DOL and develop points of contact at DOL to discuss concerns and direct inquiries regarding the processing of nurse applications.

In conclusion, while the report makes recommendations to improve the processing of the I-140 Schedule A petitions at the USCIS, legislative action is still needed to increase the number of immigrant visas available each year for nurses. Indications so far from incoming President Obama and the incoming Congress are good that this issue will be dealt with early in 2009.  The Ombudsman’s Report and the reasonably good chances of increased immigrant visa quotas for nurses reinforce our opinion that hospitals, staffing agencies and other healthcare providers should be filing I-140 Schedule A visa petitions now to establish their position on the immigrant visa quota waiting list in order to be ahead of the competition when more immigrant visas become available and the processing procedures improve and become faster.      

Please feel free to contact us with any questions that you might have pertaining to this information.  As always, we are available to assist you with your immigration needs for all healthcare occupations.  This is our area of specialty.  Our highly trained staff stands ready to work with you on designing an immigration program that suits your specific needs and requirements for 2009.

For more information on the report:
Read the original congressional memo

By Thomas J. Joy, Esq.

October 2008 Newsletter

October 1, 2008 marks the start of the new government Fiscal Year 2009 (“FY 2009”). At this time the new annual quota of immigrant visa numbers becomes available. Unfortunately, retrogression is still with us.

The anxiously awaited State Department October Visa Bulletin indicates EB-3 cutoff dates as follows: China (October 1, 2001), India (July 1, 2001), Mexico (July 1, 2002), Philippines (January 1, 2005), all other countries (January 1, 2005). Earlier visa bulletins had predicted that FY 2009 would start with the more favorable cutoff dates that had existed in June 2008 just before the EB-3 category became totally unavailable from July through September 2008. 

However, heavier demand from USCIS than anticipated has caused the State Department to establish cutoff dates further back than those that existed for June 2008. Finally, a note in the October Visa Bulletin states that little if any forward movement is likely until the extent of the USCIS backlog of old priority dates can be determined. As a result, at this time, it is impossible to predict or even guess how soon immigrant visa numbers will become available for later filed cases. We will keep you advised of any new information as it is released by the State Department. 

In the area of proposed new laws to increase the immigrant visa quotas for nurses and to recapture unused immigrant visa numbers from previous annual quotas, significant progress has been made as previously reported here. The nurse legislation and the recapture legislation introduced in the House of Representatives has been repeatedly postponed for further hearings and the recapture legislation introduced in the Senate has not yet been scheduled for hearings. 

This proposed legislation is the result of bipartisan efforts. With Congress leaving for the upcoming national elections and the ongoing problems with the US economy, it is unlikely that this pending legislation will be enacted this year. 

However, due to the bipartisan support for and the significant progress of this pending legislation this past year, we are optimistic that same or similar legislation will be reintroduced in the new Congress which will start in early 2009.

As stated here previously, we advise and encourage you to continue to file your Schedule A immigrant visa petitions for nurses. This initial step in the immigrant process is not prevented by the presence of retrogression. 

By filing now, you will be ahead of the competition when retrogression is lifted by the enactment of the proposed nurse and recapture legislation.

By Thomas J. Joy, Esq.

The national elections in November 2008 will result in a new President.  In addition, all of the seats in the House of Representatives and one-third of the seats in the Senate will be contested.  The focus is understandably on the race for President.  However, the elections in the House of Representatives and the Senate are just as important, if not more so, when considering the controversial issue of immigration.  As a general constitutional principle, neither the President nor the Congress can create new laws on their own.  Each needs the other in order for new laws involving controversial issues to be enacted.

At first glance on the major immigration issues being debated in the election, Barack Obama, the candidate of the Democratic Party, and John McCain, the candidate of the Republican Party, would seem to agree.  Both support securing the borders of the United States from illegal immigration.  Both support bringing the illegal immigrants already in the United States out of the shadows and into the mainstream.  Both support the implementation of an electronic employment eligibility verification system and enforcement against employers who hire illegal workers.  Both support reform of the immigration system to fill needed jobs in the United States while at the same time protecting the American labor market.  Finally, both support the need to reunite families.

Upon closer inspection, however, one can clearly see major differences in degree in their positions on the various issues.  Their political party affiliation has a major influence on how serious and committed they can and will be on the issues.  As members of the Senate, both supported the failed comprehensive immigration reform efforts in the recent past.  John McCain, however, has alienated the conservatives within the Republican Party for having co-sponsored a comprehensive immigration reform law with leading Democratic Party liberal Senator Edward Kennedy.

As a result of the conflict within his own party, John McCain has moved more to a “secure the borders first” position and away from a strong position on comprehensive immigration reform.  On the other hand, Barack Obama, while articulating a strong support for comprehensive immigration reform, must deal with a key group of conservative Democrats who tend to vote with the enforcement oriented Republicans on immigration issues.  At the far end of the Democratic Party spectrum are those few who want to focus only on legalization (otherwise called amnesty by some).  At the far end of the Republican spectrum are those few who want to change the 14th Amendment of the Constitution to deny United States citizenship to children born in the United States to illegal alien parents.

Meanwhile, there is presently proposed bipartisan legislation pending in Congress to increase the quotas for employment based immigrants and also to provide more immigrant visas in the healthcare industry.  If these proposed laws do not become law this year, they will almost certainly be reintroduced early in 2009 when the new President and Congress take office.

In summary, we must take a wait and see position concerning how successfully the new President will be able to bring together the different factions in his own party and work together with the other party to structure and pass a comprehensive immigration law.

On July 31, 2008, Robert Menendez (D-NJ), introduced in Congress S. 3414 that was referred to Senate Committee. This Bill would recapture all employment and family-based green cards lost between 1992 and 2007 and would protect employment-based and family-based visas from being lost in the future.

This bill is basically identical to the recapture bill that passed mark-up on 8/1/08 in the House (HR 5882).

The Senate bill additionally proposes to extend the Conrad State 30 Physician Programs to June 1, 21013 (5 years) that provides each of the 50 states with 30 J-1 physician waivers each fiscal year; extend the E-Verify program for the electronic employment verification of new employees (formerly known as the Basic Pilot Program); extend the non-minister R-1 program to 10/01/2011 and requires DHS to issue final regulations to reduce fraud by 2010; requires DHS to provide payment to SSA so that E-Verify doesn’t interfere with services provided to seniors, people with disabilities and survivors. Lastly, it requires the GAO to report to Congress on the cases of Erroneous Tentative Non-confirmations when using E-Verify, how they are resolved and the effect that it has on employers, individuals and federal agencies.

Co-sponsors of the bill include: Senators Patty Murray (D-WA), Ted Kennedy (D-MA) and Maria Cantwell (WA).

These are very positive signs that the candle is lit to push forward piecemeal comprehensive immigration legislation with both chambers now engaged in the process.

For more information on the bills:
Read this from Washington Watch