ICE has filed a 60-day notice for a new information collection application with the OMB (Office of Management and Budget) for their IMAGE Program (ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers) that is the education component of the Office of Investigations (OI) Worksite Enforcement program.  The Notice is available here.  Comments will be accepted for 60 days until August 10, 2010, and should be sent to the person named in the Notice.

In an article published on ILW.com on the subject, the author states:

In July of 2006, ICE announced two measures billed as “voluntary partnerships with the government.” The first is a list of what the agency considers to be “Best Hiring Practices.” The second is a voluntary program entitled the “ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers,” also referred to as IMAGE , which it has been working on since at least July of 2005. The government is actively promoting these programs to employers.

What are considered Best Hiring practices?

As part of the ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers, the (IMAGE) program, DHS recommends the following “best hiring practices” as follows:

• Use E-Verify to verify the employment eligibility of all new hires.
• Use the Social Security Number Verification Service (SSNVS) and make a good-faith effort to correct and verify the names and Social Security numbers of the current workforce.
• Establish a written hiring and employment eligibility verification policy (I-9 policy)
• Establish an internal compliance and training program related to the hiring and employment verification process, including completion of the I-9 form, how to detect the fraudulent use of documents in the verification process, and how to use E-Verify and SSNVS.  Require the I-9 and E-Verify process to be conducted only by an individual who has received appropriate training, and include a secondary review as part of each employee’s verification “to minimize the potential for a single individual to subvert the process.”
• Arrange for annual I-9 audits by an external auditing firm or a trained employee not otherwise involved in the I-9 process.
• Establish a procedure to report to ICE credible information of suspected criminal misconduct in the employment eligibility verification process.
• Establish a program to assess subcontractors’ compliance with employment eligibility verification requirements. Encourage contractors to incorporate IMAGE Best Practices and when practicable incorporate the verification requirements in subcontractor agreements.
• Establish a protocol for responding to letters received from federal and state government agencies indicating that there is a discrepancy between the agency’s information and the information provided by the employer or employee (for example, “no-match” letters received from the Social Security Administration).
• Establish a tip line mechanism (e.g., inbox, e-mail) for employees to report activity relating to the employment of unauthorized workers, and a protocol for responding to employee tips.
• Establish and maintain appropriate policies, practices, and safeguards against use of the verification process for unlawful discrimination, and to ensure that U.S. citizens and authorized workers do not face discrimination with respect to hiring, firing, or recruitment or referral for a fee because of citizenship status or national origin.
• Maintain copies of any documents accepted as proof of identity and/or employment authorization for all new hires.

Note:  It is important to notice that some of these points listed above have critical content.  We link to the ILW.com excellent analysis of Best Practices and the IMAGE program for employers to carefully consider prior to enrolling in these programs.

Should you require further assistance or consultation regarding these programs, please contact our office.

As reported by the Legal Action Center (AILA).  Broadgate et al. v. USCIS et al., No. 1:10cv00941 (D.C.D. filed June 8, 2010)

Three employers (software developers and IT services firms) and two not-for-profit trade associations are challenging the Neufeld memo in federal district court. The plaintiffs allege that USCIS issued the memo in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act’s notice and comment requirements; that USCIS failed to perform a Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis; that the memo is inconsistent with existing regulations addressing the employee-employer relationship and the term “contractor” and conflicts with the plain language of the INA; and that it is arbitrary and capricious. Plaintiffs ask the court to preliminarily and permanently enjoin USCIS from implementing the memo.

AILA sent a detailed letter to USCIS Chief Council, Roxana Bacon, in which it expressed concern about the substance of the January 8, 2010 H-1B memo and noted that its issuance was in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act’s notice and comment requirements. The letter primarily focuses on recent USCIS decisions that unlawfully find that individuals with controlling or substantial interests in a petitioning U.S. company or its foreign parent company cannot — in most cases — be a beneficiary of a nonimmigrant or immigrant employment-based petition.

We will continue to keep you posted on this topic.

::::::::

USCIS Proposes Fee Increase

USCIS has published a Proposed Rule in the Federal Register to increase immigration fees.  The cost of applying for a green card will increase from $930 to $985.  The application fee for a family petition (I-130) will be $420, up from $355.  The cost of an I-140 employment-based petition will rise over $100 and premium processing fees will increase by 22.5%.  The application for employment authorization would increase to $380 from $340. A separate fee for fingerprints and other biometrics with many applications would increase to $85 from $80.  Among several new fees, officials said, will be a $6,230 charge for foreigners proposing to invest $500,000 or more in businesses to create jobs in the United States.

The NY Times reports that Alejandro Mayorkas, director of  USCIS, said the fee increase was necessary because declining applications for documents in the past two years had lowered revenues and left his agency — which is 90% financed by fees — with a budget shortfall of about $200 million for the coming fiscal year.

The increases come as Congress has put off immigration legislation and an Arizona law that makes it a state crime to be in the country illegally goes into effect July 29.

The timing makes Clarissa Martinez wonder what message the fee increases sends to immigrants trying to take a legal path into the country.  “It begs the question of Congress: If we want these people to take these steps, we have to make sure that we’re not pricing them out of their reach,” said Martinez, director of immigration and national campaigns for the National Council of La Raza, a Hispanic civil rights group.

::::::::

If you’d like to stay in touch with our office and sign up for our information, blog and news, you can do so here. You can follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn here.

We have been advised that for employers enrolled in E-Verify that, in conjunction with the redesign of the E-Verify web interface, employers will be required to complete the new on-line tutorial before being able to E-Verify new workers.

You will note, that there will be a sneak preview presentation (registration required) on Thursday June 10th.

In a very interesting Blog post on The Hill (the blog for Congress), Rep Dana Rohrabacher reports that the Obama administration’s reaction to Arizona’s efforts to get an untenable situation under control, has been disappointingly predictable and dismissive of the majority of the American people who support what Arizona is doing.   He further states, “At every turn this administration has attempted to vilify Arizona’s efforts to enforce the law from threats of litigation by the Justice Department to our President allowing Mexican President, Felipe Calderon, to lecture us  about our immigration laws from the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives.”

Rep Rohrabacher asserts that illegal immigration in the US is big business  for Mexico. After oil, the number two source of income  for Mexico is the roughly $25 billion of remittances sent back there from workers in the United States, many of whom are here illegally.

Rohrabacher blogs that one of the tactics used by the Mexican government to help maintain this revenue source is the issuance of what is known as a “Matricula Consular ID Card” to Mexican nationals who do not have proper documentation to be in this country legally. The purpose of this ID card is to help make it easier for illegals to access public services, obtain housing or open bank accounts.

According to a recent report by the Federation for Immigration Reform:

Matricula Consular ID cards — two million of which have been issued in the last two years, have drawn heated criticism because they are issued to illegal aliens who cannot access U.S.-issued identity documents. Because consular ID cards are only needed by people who aren’t legally in the U.S. in the first place, communities and businesses that accept the cards as valid ID are undermining immigration enforcement and compromising U.S. security.

Rohrabacher states that one of the tactics used by the Mexican government to help maintain this revenue source is the issuance of what is known as a “matricula consular ID card” to Mexican nationals who do not have proper documentation to be in this country legally. The purpose of this ID card is to help make it easier for illegals to access public services, obtain housing or open bank accounts.

According to a recent report by the Federation for Immigration Reform:

Matricula Consular ID Cards — two million of which have been issued in the last two years, have drawn heated criticism because they are issued to illegal aliens who cannot access U.S.-issued identity documents. Because consular ID cards are only needed by people who aren’t legally in the U.S. in the first place, communities and businesses that accept the cards as valid ID are undermining immigration enforcement and compromising U.S. security.

“There’s no way around the fact that consular ID cards are only needed by people who aren’t legally in the U.S. in the first place. Indeed, relying on the Mexican Matricula for identification is tantamount to admitting that the bearer is in the U.S. illegally, as no one here legally has a need for one.”

“The FBI and the Department of Justice say that the cards are not a reliable form of identification and pose “major criminal threats” and a “potential terrorist threat.”

For more on this story, go to the the blog link above.

The Immigration Policy Center reported today that President Obama will be meeting with Arizona Governor Jan Brewer on Thursday, June 3rd to discuss border security and Arizona’s controversial new immigration law SB 1070.  While both opponents and proponents are attempting to assess the impact the new law may have on residents of Arizona-citizens and immigrants alike, some  22 states (at last count) are considering similar legislation. Multiple lawsuits have been filed challenging the constitutionality of the law, opponents are mounting a boycott, and numerous polls show that a majority of the public both supports the Arizona law and comprehensive immigration reform.

The Immigration Policy Center has put together a Special Report on “What you Need to Know about the New Law and How it Can Impact your State”.  One of the opening statements of the Guide reads as follows:

“SB 1070 represents, among other things, a growing frustration with our broken immigration system.  Ultimately, the courts will decide the constitutionality of the law, while time will answer many questions about its impact.  In the short term, as other states contemplate copying Arizona’s version of immigration reform, there is plenty of evidence to suggest that an enforcement-only approach – whether attempted at the federal or state level – does not solve the immigration problem.”

For those of you who participated on the Listening Session conference call, USCIS has released the Executive Summary follow-up and recap of the call.  In the Summary, links are provided to a List of Federal Contractors that are enrolled in the FAR E-Verify Program, a link to the revised FAQ’s that can be found on the same page under links and resources.

A Self-Check Initiative will be introduced in December. This initiative will enable anyone to go to the website and run a verification query on him/herself and determine the accuracy of  his/her government record.

The Summary further states that USCIS has surpassed 200,000 registrants for E-Verify, which encompasses over 700,000 worksites nationwide, and:

•  A strong employee rights initiative has been created and a partnership with the Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Office of Special Counsel has been formed, resulting in the introduction of an employee hotline and the release of videos, both for employees and employers, to guide them through the Tentative Nonconfirmation (TNC) process. These videos can be viewed on the USCIS website and YouTube and are also available on DVD.
•  The E-Verify public web pages have been redesigned and features an expanded employee support section.

Big changes are coming to E-Verify in June that will enhance its usability, security, accuracy and efficiency. The USCIS has announced that its newly redesigned E-Verify web interface will go live on June 13, 2010. As previously reported, the new E-Verify look (internally called E-Verify 3.0) promises to offer “a clean and modern design, easy and intuitive navigation, and clear and simple language.  A new home page, a new case alerts feature, improved case management and a streamlined tutorial are among the dozens of improvements coming to E-Verify.

Check out the new E-Verify Redesign section of the website to learn more about what’s coming and what E-Verify users can do to prepare.

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

USCIS Revises EAD Card (Employment Authorization Document) – Effective June 4th

What does this mean in the I-9 context?   The EAD Card (or Form I-766) is an acceptable List A document, which establishes both identity and work authorization. It’s important to note, however, that the EAD is evidence of temporary work authorization which expires at some point in time. Before that expiration occurs, employers need to re-verify the employee’s continuing eligibility to the work in the US. (in Section 3 of the form) in order to avoid penalties and other issues.  Most employers storing pen & paper I-9s utilize a ticker or calendar system for reminders, while those with electronic I-9 systems will receive automatic email reminders and prompts for re-verification.

The EAD is also noteworthy for employers participating in E-Verify, since it is one of two documents (the I-551 green card being the other) which must be photocopied and retained by the employer during the I-9 process. This photocopy requirement, outlined in the E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding, enables employers to use the E-Verify photo matching tool to compare the document against DHS records. For more information on the photo tool, please visit this brief outline here.

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Immigration Solutions has created a package of services and solutions to assist you with your compliance procedures that can be tailored to your specific needs and concerns.  Today is the time to develop a strategy and be prepared in advance with an Immigration Compliance Program that simply outlines how your company will manage its employer compliance responsibilities.

Arizona Immigration Law Could Cost US World Cup

As reported in The Arizona Republic, the US bid to host the 2018 or the 2022 World Cup may be jeopardized by plans to include as one of the 18 venues the University of Phoenix Stadium if awarded the two World Cups.

:::::::::::

Arts Community Submit Comments to Immigration Services

On May 11, USCIS opened a public comment period, inviting feedback regarding a specific area of artist visa processing (the O-1 Visa) concerning the amount of time allowable between multiple engagements in a single visa approval period.  Here is a copy of the draft memo open for public comment.  Dance USA, in partnership with the National Performing Arts Visa Working Group, submitted comments to USCIS on May 24th.

Dance USA reports on questions by Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) to USCIS Director Alejandro Mayorkas regarding problems with arts visa processing:

On Tuesday, May 11, the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration held an oversight hearing on USCIS. Senator Hatch (R-UT) questioned USCIS Director Mayorkas about O and P visas, the ARTS Act, the increase in Requests for More Evidence and denials of artist visas, and the inconsistent processing at the California Processing Center. Director Mayorkas responded that he is fully aware of the challenges that petitioners are experiencing and he is working to fix the problems. He stated that USCIS is beginning a broad review of the O and P visa processing system. Senator Hatch underscored that the problems surrounding artist visas are hurting the cultural affairs of our country and that his staff receives a lot of work from constituents on this issue. Other subcommittee members at the meeting included Sen. Feinstein (D-CA), Sen. Cornyn (R-TX), Sen. Sessions (R-AL), Sen. Franken (D-MN), and Sen. Leahy (D-VT).

::::::::::

A Soccer World Cup Ticket is a Visa to South Africa

Addressing the joint committees on the state of readiness for the 2010 FIFA World Cup, Home Affairs Minister Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma said free event visas would be awarded to those with a valid FIFA World Cup ticket, while dedicated lanes would be set aside for those coming to the tournament, Bua news agency reported. For more

::::::::::

Fila Launches in Guyana

Top local athletes, basketball star Akeem Kanhai, bodybuilder Sylvon Gardener and sprinter Alicia Fortune are the new faces of the popular Italian Sportswear Company FILA In Guyana.  The sportswear was launched Friday May 14th at Giftland OfficeMax the sole authorized distributor in Guyana.

::::::::::

Jamaica Reggae Stars Denied Visas

The island nation is abuzz with reports that the U.S. has cancelled visas for a number of top entertainers. At least one major concert has been postponed, and some say it’s all about the extradition of a politically connected drug lord.

The apparent visa revocations are hitting the Jamaican music scene in Southern California and elsewhere in the U.S., according to music industry sources. Producers of the 13th Annual Seabreeze Festival, which has traditionally offered a lineup of reggae performers in Long Beach, recently said their decision to postpone the July 11 event owed in part to the “uncertainty of guaranteeing artist performance based on the current visa revocation issue surrounding Jamaican Dancehall Reggae artists.”

Reports making the rounds in Jamaica say that at least five top reggae entertainers have had their U.S. visas revoked in recent months. The Jamaica Star and various blogs have reported that Bounty Killer, Beenie Man, Adonia, Ricky Trooper, and Movado have seen their permission to travel to the U.S. cancelled. Other reports say that two other well-known reggae artists — Eek-a-Mouse and Sizzla — have also had their visas revoked.

::::::::::

Why Work with us?

Immigration Solutions provides US and global immigration services and solutions to the arts, entertainment and sports industries, amongst others.  Our staff is accustomed to dealing with celebrated personalities and brands and we have successfully obtained visas for actors, directors, athletes, coaches, sports broadcasters and other individuals of accomplishment and renown.

We understand the unique needs associated with working with celebrities and high profile personalities and we maintain distinct focus on building a bridge between the needs of our clients and their global business opportunities.

If you’d like to consult with us or become a client of our office, please contact us at info@immigrationsolution.net or call 562 612.3996.

As reported in the Washington Post 5/24/2010

Democrats crafting an overhaul of U.S. immigration laws are bringing a new approach to a long-stalled debate: giving a federal commission some power over the future flow of legal foreign workers.

Senate Democratic leaders are drafting a measure to authorize a commission to recommend levels of employment-based visas and green cards that let immigrants work legally in the United States. The plan would require Congress, in certain cases, to vote when immigrant labor is deemed out of line with demand. Although the commission would have limited influence over the skilled-immigrant market for technology and other industries, it would have a major role in regulating low-skilled foreign labor.

The commission idea originally came from Ray Marshall, Labor Secretary under President Jimmy Carter. The United States needs a nonpartisan panel that would use “rigorous” data analysis in its decisions, Marshall said in an interview.

The idea is another example of lawmakers showing a willingness to relinquish decision-making to commissions on issues that include reducing the federal debt, Iraq war policy and curbing Medicare costs.

“It’s the ultimate expression for the need for political cover,” said Ross Baker, a political science professor at Rutgers University.

Legislation being drafted by Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) is expected to take a different tack, said a Schumer aide, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The panel they envision would have a stronger role in deciding immigrant-worker levels in lower-skilled occupations — such as hotel and restaurant jobs — than in higher-skilled ones.

We’ll see how all this plays out and will continue to report on any and all immigration reform measures.

If you’re an employer that despite your efforts to hire US workers, must rely on foreign workers to grow your business, sign this petition and send it to your representatives and then pass the link along.

USCIS today announced that it has revised the Employment Authorization Document (EAD), or Form I-766, to incorporate the addition of a machine-readable zone on the back of the card.

This update to the EAD is part of USCIS’s ongoing efforts to deter immigration fraud. Starting May 11, USCIS began issuing the revised EAD cards. The machine-readable zone is compliant with International Civil Aviation Organization standards. USCIS also removed the two-dimensional bar code on the backside of the card and moved the informational box of text to just beneath the magnetic stripe on the card.  The revised card retains all of its existing security features.

These revisions are the result of extensive collaboration among Department of Homeland Security components, particularly U.S. Immigration and Custom Enforcement, Customs and Border Protection and USCIS.  For more information on employment authorization, travel documents and other immigration benefits, visit www.uscis.gov or call USCIS¿s National Customer Service Center at 1-800-375-5283.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::

New Consular Visa Fees to Start June 4, 2010

The US Department of State announced new fees for visa applications, starting on June 4, 2010. The rule establishes a tiered structure with separate fees for different nonimmigrant visa categories. Examples of the new fees include:

include:

• $140 fee for applicants for all visas that are not petition-based, including B1/B2 tourist and business visitor visas and all student and exchange visitor (F, M and J) visas, will pay a fee of $140.
• $150 fee for petition-based visas, including L, H, O, P, Q and R visas
• $350 for K-1 (fiancee) visas
• $390 for E visas.