Our March 2011 news is now available.  You can access our Immigration News here and our I-9 Compliance Newsletter here.  Should you wish to discuss your immigration case with us, we can be contacted at info@immigrationsolution.net or by phone at 562 612.3996.

We have a volume of free information on our websites that includes newsletters, news flashes, podcasts, blog, and articles.  Please feel free to sign up on our website:  www.immigrationsolution.net to receive our information through email or iTUNES.

Bloomberg News on 1/27/2011 released the findings of its report on a proposal to require every U.S. employer to use E-Verify to confirm the legal status of all new hires.  The report  revealed that businesses with less than 500 employees would undoubtedly bear the greatest burden, spending about $2.6 billion a year to use the government’s “free” web-based program, compared with less than $100 million for the 4% that used it in 2010.

A study conducted in December 2010 by Westat that was commissioned by the government as part of a multi-year evaluation of the E-Verify program represents the result of their 2009 findings of a nationwide survey of 511 respondents that encompassed nonusers (companies that have never signed a Memorandum of Understanding) to participate in E-Verify, focus groups of nonusers, surveys of users, and interviews with employees that received TNC’s (Tentative Non-Confirmations).

The primary finding of the survey and the principal barrier to participation in E-Verify appears to be a lack of awareness of the Program. Among the case study participants, 63 percent were not familiar with E-Verify. Case study participants were often positive about the characteristics of E-Verify, and among the 101 who answered a question concerning their future plans, 23 percent definitely planned to participate in E-Verify in the future (while 32 percent would not participate unless mandated to do so).

For those employers who have heard of E-Verify, the information often came from professional associations, media outlets and government materials or publications.

The other primary reasons for not participating were not perceiving a benefit from participating, and thinking it would be too costly or time-consuming to participate.  The perception of burden is based in part on employers’ negative experiences with other government Internet-based programs (such as the Social Security Administration/Business Services Online Website).

Large employers were much more likely to be familiar with E-Verify than small employers. A majority of large employers in the case study (56 percent) were familiar with E-Verify, compared with 29 percent of medium-sized employers and 17 percent of small employers.

The case study participants supported many program changes to E-Verify, with the most popular including the increased use of technology to identify fraudulent documents and to verify identity, allowing a formal appeal by an employer and/or employee of a final case finding, and allowing verification of job applicants before a job decision is made.

Some participants who decided not to use the program did so because they did not perceive any benefit in using it compared to the cost, the manpower, training and the logistics required to use the program.  Others were not using it because they felt that it was a government priority rather than a business priority.  Some felt that it wasn’t their responsibility to control illegal immigration and that it should be the government’s responsibility.

One insightful response came from a business owner who stated, “Hold me, personally, and my company harmless from any loopholes in the system that become exploited by the undocumented population . . . bottom line . . . I don’t want to make the 5 o’clock news by complying with a broken system.”

In summary, E-Verify is not perfect – it doesn’t identify identity theft issues, but it is immigration compliance best practice and should carefully be considered and the pro’s and con’s discussed with an immigration attorney that is informed and specializes in employer compliance issues prior to enrollment.

We link to the Westat Study here.  More on E-Verify Strengths and Weaknesses

We link to our I-9 Employer Compliance Resource Center here.

USCIS announced today that it has published a proposed rule that will save US businesses more than $23 million over the next 10 years by establishing an advance H-1B registration process for U.S. employers seeking to file petitions for foreign workers under the H-1B specialty occupation category.  The proposed electronic system would minimize administrative burdens and expenses related to the H-1B petition process—including reducing the need for employers to submit petitions for which visas would not be available under the visa cap.

USCIS Director Alejandro Mayorkas announced today the opening of a 60-day comment period that will allow businesses and the general public to provide input on the proposed system in order to ensure it best meets the needs of employers that rely on H-1B visas to bring in foreign workers for specialty occupations.  Mayorkas expressed that “Improving the H-1B petition process is part of USCIS’s ongoing efforts to leverage new ideas and innovation to streamline our operations and enhance customer service.”

The employer would go through an online, electronic a process that would take an estimated 30 minutes to complete.  Before the petition filing period begins, USCIS would select the number of registrations predicted to exhaust all available visas. Employers would then file petitions only for the selected registrations. The registration system would save employers the effort and expense of filing H-1B petitions, as well as Labor Condition Applications, for workers who would be unable to obtain visas under the statutory cap.

The proposed rule, which posted to the Federal Register today for public viewing, contains complete details about the registration system and estimated cost savings. USCIS encourages formal comments on the proposed rule.  We link to the following additional information:

Fact Sheet

News Release

February 16, 2011, Brett Dreyer, Chief of the Worksite Enforcement, Unit of Homeland Security Investigations, verified on 2/16/2011 that ICE continues to focus its investigations both on businesses that were brought to their attention by tips and leads, and on those that work in areas of national security and critical infrastructure. Mr. Dreyer further confirmed: “The agency continues to be interested in egregious employers as they tend to break other laws in addition to immigration…including paying employees under the table, avoiding taxes and ignoring employee protections. The inspections will touch on employers of all sizes and in every state in the nation — no one industry is being targeted nor is any one industry immune from scrutiny.”

Confirmation has been publicized that NOI’s were indeed served throughout the USA on February 17^th.  The audits are expected to be completed within the next 2-3 months. We link here for more on this story.

This is a good time to review what you should do if you are served with a Notice of Inspection (NOI):

• Immediately contact Immigration Solutions and company management
• Employers are allowed by law 3 days notice to respond by producing the I-9 records of their active as well as terminated employees within a particular period of time

The NOI will be most probably be accompanied by a very invasive Document Subpoena that might ask for all of some of the below items:  

• A copy of your I-9 Policy and Procedures Statement or Manual
• I-9 forms for current employees hired after 11/6/1986
• I-9 forms for terminated employees within the required retention period
• Complete employee lists of current and terminated employees
• Quarterly Wage and hour reports
• Payroll Summaries
• SSA Mismatch correspondence
• E-Verify and/or SSNVS documents
• Business information such as:  Employer ID number, owner’s SSN/address, business license, etc.

We work with our clients to create compliant workforces, and now is the time to be proactive if you absolutely know that you have problems with your I-9 forms; and, by the way, most employers do.  We encourage you to be proactive and take action now before you pay the high price of being put in a position where your options have diminished.

We are happy to hear from you and are very flexible with our package of compliance services and solutions.  Our talented team is read to assist you with whatever you’d like to accomplish with your compliance programs.  Visit our I-9 Resource Center here.

If you’d like to listen to this news Blog via podcast, you can do so here:

E-Verify Self Check

The USCIS Self-Check Initiative will go into effect on March 18, 2011 and will permit individuals to check their work authorization status prior to being hired and to enter data into the E-Verify system that might be reflected in federal databases to ensure that the information relating to their eligibility to work is correct and up to date.  This will lead to a more  reliable and accurate E-Verify system that works better for both employers and employees.

How does Self-Check work?

E-Verify self check uses a Web-based interface that will be accessible to all individuals and is a free, voluntary service offered by the government to provide information to the user about his/her employment eligibility in the USA.  The user will not need to register or open an account, but will be required to agree to the “Terms of Use” and restrictions on usage (you may only run a self check on your own information) detailed on the E-Verify Self-Check website before granted access.

The information collected will only be used to:

• Confirm the identity of the user and
• Confirmation of work authorization

The user will be asked to confirm their current work authorization status and to enter minimal biographic information (name, address, date of birth, the social security number is optional).

After the information is submitted it is authenticated by a 3^rd party Identify Assurance Service that will generate 2 and 4 questions that only the user can answer.  If the user is unable to answer a question or the databases of available information from public records, financial institutions and other available records are insufficient, the user’s identify will not be authenticated and the user will be unable to advance to the next step and complete usage of the system. In this event, none of the information entered is provided to or retained by E-Verify Self-Check.  The system does retain, however, a transaction number, the reason for failure, the date and time of the transaction and the error code.

Once the user’s identity has been authenticated, they can then run an employment eligibility query to determine their work eligibility status.  The biographic information that was provided will pre-populate (and cannot be changed) and additional information will be requested that is identical to the information and documentation required for the I-9 form. Following this step, one of three results can occur:

1)  Confirmation of Work Authorization

2)   Possible SSA mis-match information; and

3)  Possible immigration information mis-match

The user is then asked if they wish to resolve the issue if 2 & 3 above are received.  With an SSA mis-match, the system generates a form with their name and biographic information along with the E-Verify Case Number with detailed instructions as to how to resolve the issue  If the issue is immigration related, the system provides instructions to contact E-Verify Customer Service to assist in the correction of their immigration records within 72 hours after the inquiry to speak with a status verification representative.  If the user’s record cannot be corrected by the representative, the user will be advised of further actions required to resolve their immigration mis-match.

Confirming Work Authorization Without Identity

If an individual is unable to authenticate through the IdP but wants to determine work authorization status prior to hire, USCIS will provide information on how to visit a Social Security Administration field office, access Social Security yearly statements, call USCIS, or submit a Freedom of Information Act/ Privacy Act request to access work authorization records. The individual will also be advised to check the information at the various credit bureaus and through a free credit check website.

Conclusion

With the self check program, workers will be able to use E-Verify in much the same way as employers, except that workers will need to take extra steps to verify their own identity.  It will alleviate much of the administrative burdens that fall on employers who receive an E-Verify non-tentative confirmation of an employee’s work eligibility, since the new tool should allow employees to identify and resolve verification problems before they begin a new job.

Resources

For more information on E-Verify, visit USCIS’  E-Verify homepage.

E-Verify Employee Rights and  Responsibilities

If you prefer to listen to a podcast of our news blog, you can access it here.

Last week, USCIS announced that it is now issuing employment and travel authorization on a single card for certain applicants filing an Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, Form I-485. This new card represents a significant improvement from the current practice of issuing paper Advance Parole documents.   A sample card and FAQs can be found here.

The card looks similar to the current Employment Authorization Document (EAD) but will include text that reads, “Serves as I-512 Advance Parole.” A card with this text will serve as both an employment authorization and Advance Parole document. The new card is also more secure and more durable than the current paper Advance Parole document.

An applicant may receive this card when he or she files an Application for Employment Authorization, Form I-765, and an Application for Travel Document, Form I-131, concurrently with or after filing Form I-485. USCIS will continue to issue separate EAD and Advance Parole documents as warranted. Employers may accept the new card as a List A document when completing the Employment Eligibility Verification, Form I-9.  The back of the card retains the machine-readable zone (MRZ) which was introduced on EADs back in May of 2010.  The new document is evidence of “temporary” work authorization which has an expiration date that will need to be reverified in order for the employee to maintain their work authorization in the USA.  The reverification can be indicated on Section 3 of the I-9 form or by completing a new I-9 form.

Note that the EAD card for those employers that participate in E-Verify, is one of three documents which must be photocopied and retained by the employer during the I-9 process as part of the E-Verify photo matching requirement.

As with the current Advance Parole document, obtaining a combined Advance Parole and employment authorization card allows an applicant for adjustment of status to travel abroad and return to the U.S. without abandoning the pending adjustment application. Upon returning to the U.S., the individual who travels with the card must present the card to request parole through the port-of-entry. The decision to parole the individual is made at the port-of-entry. Individuals who have been unlawfully present in the U.S. and subsequently depart and seek re-entry through a grant of parole may be inadmissible and ineligible to adjust their status.

The USCIS held a public engagement stakeholder conference on February 2, 2011 where Director Mayorkas announced several new initiatives that they would be launching. We’ll address a few of them, as follows:

1. A partnership with DMV so that they have the capability of accessing the DMV database.  More on this to follow
2. USCIS “Mobile”:  A program that will enable mobile units to access areas within communities that are not being served by pro bono organizations
3. The Secure Mail Initiative:  A partnership with the US Postal Service to ensure that important mail is forwarded and involves sending the secure documents using   Priority Mail with Delivery Confirmation. Using this process allows them to track each individual piece of mail electronically through the U.S. Postal Service and speeds our delivery time while enhancing accountability.  Unfortunately this does not include at this time the mailing of receipt or appointment notices.  Although no plan is perfect, it seems like this new method of mailing important immigration documentation will ensure document receipt in most cases as the recipient, or someone in the same household, will be required to confirm delivery of this documentation.
4. The VIBE Program:  USCIS first announced VIBE back in May 2010 and apparently the beta testing that was supposed to start in June has been delayed until now.  Petitioning employers could possibly begin to see more questions from USCIS about their business operations, commercial activities, structure and employee population.  The program will use Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) databases to verify employer information that is required in certain employment-based petitions. The program is supposedly designed to reduce the documentation that employers are now required to submit with each filing.  VIBE will be used to confirm a petitioner’s ownership, date of establishment, current address, financial information and their relationship with other entities, to name a few.  We highly advise employers to be proactive and update their D&B information and correct any errors.  VIBE will be used to verify I-129 nonimmigrant petitions for E, H-1B, L-1, L blanket, and TN classification, among others.  The I-140 immigrant petitions in the employment-based first preference (EB-1) subcategories for outstanding professors and researchers and multinational managers will also be verified through VIBE, as will EB-2 advanced-degree professional and exceptional ability cases and EB-3 professional, skilled and unskilled worker petitions. VIBE will not be used in for EB-1 extraordinary ability, EB-2 national interest waiver or EB-5 immigrant investor classification, or for O and P nonimmigrant petitions.  The VIBE Program could mean that employers may receive more USCIS requests for evidence (RFEs) and notices of intent to deny (NOIDs)  on immigration petitions, which could cause delays in processing. Be alert to the fact that USCIS plans to issue RFEs or NOIDs when the information provided in an employment-based petition conflicts with the Dun & Bradstreet databases that appear to be the program’s significant resource.
5. “I-9 Cental”  Website:   USCIS will be announcing a new I-9 form compliance website that’s supposed to be available in the Spring of 2011.  The website will provide detailed guidance on how to complete the I-9 form.  The website is supposed to offer smart features such help text, drop down boxes and other interactive tools to help guide the employer and to prevent some of the most comon errors from occurring. 

 We will continue to update on VIBE and I-9 Central as well as other USCIS new initiatives as we hear about them.

For those of you who might like to listen to the news rather than read it, we invite you to tune into “InFOCUS” – immigration news and updates to listen to our podcast on the above-captioned topic.  Should you wish to contact our office to discuss your particular immigration needs, please feel free to do so here.

For those of you who might rather listen to our news than read it, we are releasing a podcast of a previous Blog post on the topic of the I-9 Revised Employer Handbook that was released by USCIS last month that provides additional guidance on many of the most frequently asked questions that we see in our employer compliance practice.  Have a listen and please take our Survey.   For a list of our compliance services and solutions we link here.

#1: The Job Description and Degree Requirement

The job offer and the job description must be for a specialty occupation that requires a minimum of a bachelor’s degree or its foreign equivalent.  What is the definition of a specialty occupation?  A specialty occupation requires the theoretical and practical application of a body of specialized knowledge along with at least a bachelor’s degree or its equivalent. For example, information technology, architecture, engineering, mathematics, physical sciences, social sciences, medicine and health, education, business specialties, accounting, law, theology, and the arts are specialty occupations.

Small to medium-size companies are being asked to justify why the position requires someone with a bachelor’s degree and to explain, through various types of evidence including organizational charts, classified ads for the position, and educational information pertaining to existing or previous employees in the same position, why their business is more unique than other similar businesses in their industry that they would require a candidate with a bachelor’s degree in a particular position.

Bachelor’s Degree equivalency can be attained through a single-source foreign degree that meets US standards, a combination of a degree and work experience, or a work experience alone equivalency that meets the “3 for 1” rule; namely, that 3 years of work experience to 1 year of university level education (this requires an expert credential evaluation by a service that is authorized to evaluate work experience).

Note: Bear in mind that if you have a skilled immigration professional that has a strategy in place for your green-card sponsorship (permanent residency), it is essential that your degree and its equivalency be carefully reviewed so that it will be compatible with the classification under which you will be filing your PERM labor certification and green-card case.

USCIS now requires very detailed job descriptions that contain the position summary, duties and responsibilities, as well as the percentage of time spent on each job duty. It is hard to imagine that a job description with a 15-bullet point list of duties and a full page in length is insufficient, but when you work with a skilled immigration practitioner, this can be successfully argued against the O*NET and the OOH which is the primary source of job information for USCIS and the Department of Labor.

In summary: Employers need to be prepared with complete job descriptions for their H-1B prospective employees and document the need for a degreed professional thoroughly in their casework and work with an immigration attorney that is well versed in handling H-1Bs as well as PERM labor certifications.

#2:  Plan Ahead and File Early

When should I start my case? Immigration Solutions accepts H-1B cap-subject cases well in advance of April 1st to avoid the rush that normally occurs when employers become aware of cap deadlines and when foreign workers obtain job offers that require cap subject visa numbers. Bottom line, cap-subject cases should be started ASAP.  We advise employers to assess their hiring needs for FY 2012 and contact their immigration attorney to discuss timing issues.

How long does it take to prepare an H-1B Case? We do not recommend waiting until the last minute because of the various government agencies that are involved in the process. With good front-end case strategy, consulting with an attorney that has a depth of experience with H-1Bs with and a streamlined case process – the many steps involved in preparing an H-1B requiring the cooperation of all parties, can go very smooth and an approvable petition can be filed with all necessary supporting documentation.  An approval requires that a case be prepared correctly from the start.  It is often not possible to reverse strategy after the case is filed.  Planning ahead is crucial to flush out any issues that need to be overcome, particularly when working with IT and healthcare consultants and staffing agencies that have 3^rd party jobsite issues.

In summary, the demand for H-1B visas, although not as high in this economy, have tougher documentation standards and Department of Labor delays sometimes for several weeks with employer EIN# verification issues. By understanding the issues involved in the H-1B process, one can take a proactive approach to assure that the needs of all parties are addressed early.

#3:  When the Occupation Requires a License

USCIS’ approval of an H-1B petition that requires a license, is not authorization for the employee to practice his or her profession without the required license. This is particularly prevalent when processing H-1Bs for teachers and healthcare professionals.  USCIS regulation provides that if an occupation requires a state or local license to fully perform the duties of the occupation, the foreign worker must have the license prior to the approval of the petition.

This can be a Catch 22….Some states will not issue a state license unless the individual worker presents evidence to the State Board that they are legally authorized to be employed in the USA. Some State Boards require the worker to establish to the State Board that they have been granted H-1B status as a prerequisite to issuing the license. For example, certain State Boards of Pharmacy will not issue a pharmacist license until the worker presents evidence of work authorization. Teachers and registered nurses have been unable to obtain licensure until they obtain social security numbers which cannot be achieved until one is authorized to work in the USA.

With the above being said, USCIS adjudicators have been instructed to approve H-1B petitions for a one-year period if a State or local license to engage in the profession is required, and the appropriate licensing authority will not provide such license to the worker without evidence that that they have been granted H-1B status. At the end of the one-year period, the employer is required to file another petition with a request for extension and also present evidence at that time that state licensure has been obtained.

As a condition to approving petitions involving state or local licensure, the worker must demonstrate that they have filed an application for the license according to the State or local rules and procedures, provide evidence that they are qualified to receive the license, and that all educational, training experience and other requirements are met, including healthcare certification, at the time of filing the petition. For instance, Physical Therapists must provide a letter or statement signed by an authorized state physical therapy licensing official in the state of intended employment, indicating that the PT is qualified to take the state’s written licensing examination for physical therapists and thereafter obtain state licensure.

:::::::::::

If you are not a client of our firm and would like to discuss H-1Bs as well as any other immigration matters, we invite you to contact us at info@immigrationsolution.net | telephone 562 612.3996 to set up a consutation.