It has been reported to the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) by a senior Department of State official that immigrant visas for EB-2 India and mainland China were exhausted for this fiscal year as of April 11th. USCIS will continue to accept EB-2 India/China adjustment of status applications based on the priority date cut-offs in both the April and May 2012 Visa Bulletins, but the cases will be on hold until the start of the new 2013 fiscal year as of 10/1/2012 when quotas open up again.  We link to the Visa Bulletins for April and May.

According to the Visa Bulletins, EB-2 India /China applicants with priority dates earlier than May 1, 2010 can continue to file adjustment of status applications with USCIS through April 30, 2012. Those with priority dates earlier than August 15, 2007 can continue to file through May 31, 2012.

USCIS has partnered with business experts to ‘supposedly’ improve the way they approach the employment-based and high-skilled visa categories used by immigrant entrepreneurs. We’d really like to hope for the best on this that something major occurs as a result of opening up to public expertise and excellence in order to relax the restrictive business immigration environment that is prevalent at this time.

Director Alejandro Mayorkas kicked-off this innovative program, called the Entrepreneurs in Residence (EIR) initiative, with an Information Summit in Silicon Valley in February. Now, USCIS has entered a new phase of the initiative by bringing together the EIR Tactical Team. For 90 days this collaborative team, comprised of both USCIS employees and entrepreneurs from the private sector, will identify opportunities where USCIS can streamline pathways for foreign entrepreneurs. Team members began their work at USCIS in late March.

Last week, they traveled to the California Service Center and met with USCIS officers to discuss the visa categories most often used by immigrant entrepreneurs: H-1B, L-1 E-1, E-2, and O-1.

We direct you to Team Member bios here.

On March 12, 2012 USCIS revised the FAQs that reference the Jan 8, 2010 Donald Neufeld Memo that relates to the employer-employee relationship in adjudicating H-1B Petitions for 3rd Party Jobsite Placements. This topic is still very complex and greatly impacts the IT, healthcare and staffing agency industries in their ability to file for H-1B visa petitions on behalf of foreign professionals.  We link above to this updated guidance, and  remind you that our office is available to assist you with your H-1B case filings as it relates to these and other industries. If you have any questions pertaining to this topic or any other matter, please contact us.

The OSC has provided a valuable resource in sharing their letter responses to various employment eligibility verification compliance inquiries from stakeholders. The topics include: Non-Discrimination Practices, Pre-Employment Inquiries, Form I-9  Document Abuse, SS No-Match Letters, Dishonesty/Falsification Issues, using acceptable language for job postings, and much more.

Here are a few citations:

Re:  Question Concerning Re-Verifying Work Authorization when Discrepancies with SS are Discovered: “An employer is only under a duty to investigate further if it knows or has knowledge that would lead a reasonable person to believe that an individual is not authorized to work in the United States.  There are many possible reasons for why an employee’s name and Social Security number may not match.  Therefore, employers should not draw conclusions about an employee’s work authorization status based solely on information indicating that the employee’s name and Social Security number cannot be found in a system of records-whether the records are directly managed by the Social Security Administration or any other private or public entity. Furthermore, the mere receipt of a no-match letter or other no-match notice does not, standing alone, constitute ‘constructive knowledge’ on the part of an employer that the referenced employee is not work authorized. Only the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is legally authorized to conclusively determine an individual’s authorization to work.  OSC also cautions employers against providing an unreasonably short period of time to clear up a Social Security no-match…” It it strongly recommended that you consult with a qualified attorney in employment-related immigration law before jumping to any conclusions that might possibly escalate into a very unpleasant scenario for all parties concerned.

Question re Modifying the List of I-9 Acceptable Documents:  “Document abuse occurs when an employer either demands that a worker produce more or different documents than those identified in the Form 1-9 process, or refuses to honor documents tendered that on their face reasonably appear to be genuine, based on national origin or citizenship status.  To the extent that an employee either inadvertently or mistakenly indicates an incorrect immigration status in Section 1 of the Form 1-9, the limitation of documents in Section 2 may prevent that employee from presenting valid documents) acceptable for 1-9 purposes. Similarly, if the list excludes one or more documents that an employee of a particular status may possess, the limitation of documents may also prevent that employee from presenting his or her valid documents) acceptable for 1-9 purposes.”  We caution you to discuss issues such as this with experienced counsel in employment-related immigration matters before action is taken.

We trust that you will find this information useful as it relates to the enforcement of the anti-discrimination provision of the INA. Please check out a list of our compliance  services and solutions. Please be reminded that we invite you to contact our office with your employment-related immigration matters (I-9 audits, training, policy development and more).

About the OSC:  The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) enforces the anti-discrimination provision (§ 274B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b.  his federal law prohibits: 1) citizenship status discrimination in hiring, firing, or recruitment or referral for a fee, 2) national origin discrimination in hiring, firing, or recruitment or referral for a fee, 3) document abuse (unfair documentary practices during the employment eligibility verification, Form I-9, process, and 4) retaliation or intimidation.

With H-1B filing season upon us as of April 2, 2012, we take this opportunity to remind you that although there has been slow but steady economic recovery over the last few years, the H-1B cap is expected to be reached much faster this year.  This, coupled with a recent NFAP Policy Report Analysis released this month citing case denial rates of 17% with a staggering RFE (Request for Evidence) rate of 36%, sends a clear, “culture of no” message that USCIS is making it more difficult for skilled foreign nationals to work in the USA with increasing denial rates for both the H-1B and L-1 visa programs.  All the more reason to be relying on experienced business immigration council for your case filings.

The NFAP report states, “Employers report the time lost due to the increase in denials and Requests for Evidence are costing them millions of dollars in project delays and contract penalties, while aiding competitors that operate exclusively outside the United States beyond the reach of USCIS adjudicators and U.S. consular officers.”

Small to medium-size companies and IT consultants and staffing agencies often bear the burden of these overbearing RFE’s.  Working with smart immigration practitioners and preparing your case strategy in advance to address both your strengths and weaknesses, will pay off greatly.  Here are some tips that we highly recommend be incorporated in your filings:

1)     Incorporate a detailed brochure and description of the employer’s products or services and why you require a professional with a bachelor’s degree to perform the offered position.  Include promotional materials, press releases or news articles to illustrate the nature of the business, new trends and growth factors in your business that substantiate the offered position.

2)     Include a copy of your corporate tax return or financial statements to evidence profit and business stablity

3)     Explain in detail why the position cannot be performed by an employee without a bachelor’s degree; i.e. is it standard in your industry?  Provide detail (such as examples of work to be done) concerning the complexity of the position

4)     Provide a real, detailed job description with the percentage of time spent on the duties of the position, the qualifications and special skills required to perform the job.  Further explain any discretionary judgment that the employee will have in their job and other such areas of responsibility that are demanding or highly advanced

5)     Provide evidence that you have a current and past practice of hiring bachelor’s degree employees for the subject position

6)     IT and staffing agencies must be prepared to evidence the “employer-employee relationship” in H-1B offsite placement work situations by clearly evidencing the employer’s ability to “hire, pay, fire, supervise, or otherwise control the work of the employee. (based upon the January 8, 2010 Neufeld Memorandum).

If you’d like to set up a time to discuss your case with our office or to engage our services, please feel free to contact us.

Top officials from the White House and the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services are in Silicon Valley for the week to solicit viewpoints and input from the start-up community on how the administration can improve the way it hands out visas to talented entrepreneurs who’ve landed funding to create new companies.  While Obama is asking the question how he can improve the immigration process for foreign entrepreneurs, he’s stating to UniVision, “I’ve got 5 years left to solve immigration.”  Our question is, must we really remain in the dark ages for 5 more years?

The article states that comprehensive immigration reform legislation continues to remain stalled in congress, as is specific bi-partisan legislation that attempts to address some of these start-up visa issues. So the Obama administration is left trying to make the most of the rules that it currently has on the books by re-interpreting a more accommodating implementation of those rules with fresh information gathered from the field.   The consensus is that Obama lacks the conviction to use his executive authority in an election year on controversial immigration issues, and that this is simply PR.  We say — this is exactly the time for him to use his executive authority anywhere he possibly can concerning immigration reform.   We shall see if anything comes of this.  More on this here.

USCIS has extended an invitation to join them as they launch their Entrepreneurs in Residence (EIR) initiative with an Information Summit focused on ensuring that the immigration pathways for foreign entrepreneurs are clear, consistent, and better reflect today’s business realities. The engagement will be held February 22, 2012 at 8:30AM – 5:30PM (Pacific Standard Time), in Silicon Valley, CA.

Through panel discussions and breakout sessions, the Summit will give participants the opportunity to share their strategic thinking and business expertise with the agency. The feedback from the Summit will inform the work of the Entrepreneurs in Residence tactical team, which will bring business experts in-house to work alongside USCIS staff to maximize current immigration laws’ potential to attract foreign entrepreneurial talent and to work alongside USCIS staff for a period of approximately 90 days.

This issue is currently under examination within the H-1B policy review working group as part of the comprehensive USCIS policy review.  It has long been fraught with confusing and sometimes contradictory policy guidance regarding when a change in employee work location requires a new H-1B petition.

The fact is that not every change in jobsite location represents a ‘material change’ and not every change equates to a change in the conditions of employment, particularly if the change is in the same Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) upon which the Labor Condition Application and the prevailing wage is based.

It has long been the policy articulated in the October 23, 2003 Efren Hernandez letter (AILA Doc. No. 03112118), that changes in job site location do not require amended H-1B filings as long as a Certified Labor Condition Application is in place; an LCA posting notice under DOL regulations was completed, and other wage and hour obligations are met.

The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) is requesting that USCIS “issue clear and unequivocal guidance confirming the provisions in the Hernandez letter so that petitioners and USCIS can follow and rely upon it.”

We will keep you informed concerning this matter as developments occur.

The Department of Justice (“DOJ”) reported that it had reached a settlement with Brand Energy and Infrastructure Services and its subsidiary, Industrial Services LLC (ISI) on July 21, 2011. The DOJ reports that Industrial Services engaged in a pattern and practice of discrimination while completing Form I-9 on its non-citizen workers requiring specific employment documentation beyond what was required by law.

The investigation was prompted after a work-authorized immigrant lost his job when he could not comply with ISI’s request to provide specific employment documentation beyond what was required by law.   Further investigation revealed that ISI’s Prairieville, LA office required all newly hired non-U.S. citizens to present documents issued by the Department of Homeland Security upon hire.  The company did not require U.S. citizens to present any particular documents.

ISI has agreed to pay $43,560 in civil penalties and $7,200 in back pay, plus interest, to the injured party.   Brand and ISI have also agreed to monitoring provisions, as well as training for their human resources personnel.

What employers need to know: You just cannot presume that the employees charged with  managing your I-9 program are compliant with the law and adhering to anti-discrimination rules and regulations if you’re turning a blind eye to your compliance issues, the consequences of which today  are severe and expensive – not to mention the bad press that accompanies such an investigation. Employers must accept ANY acceptable document from List A that appears to be genuine and that relates to the worker, or a combination List B plus a List C document.  Additionally, employers are not to require more documentation than what is itemized on the List of Documents for Form I-9.

Let’s re-visit ICE’s list of best practices that include the following as a reminder to employers:

• Internal compliance & training program

• Polices/procedures safeguard against discrimination incl. training

• Require I-9 process only by those trained

• Secondary review for each I-9

• Annual I-9 audits by external auditing firm or trained person not involved in I-9 process

• Written I-9 policy

• Protocol to respond to tips/information/constructive knowledge

• Maintain copies of documents

• Participation in E-Verify/SSNVS

We are available  to assist you with your compliance  needs.  Please visit our Employer Resource Center and contact us should you wish to discuss our services and solutions.

USCIS rolled out the 1st of many new regulations for comment toward transitioning from a paper submission process to an electronic one.   The new reg goes into effect 11/28/2011.

The new regulation revises more than 50 parts of DHS regulations contained in Title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The regulation eliminates references to outdated USCIS benefit request forms and descriptions of paper-based procedures. In addition, the regulation removes numerous obsolete provisions of the regulations.

The public is invited to comment on this regulation and offer suggestions on further improvements. Comments must be received by Oct. 28, 2011. The new regulation will become effective on Nov. 28, 2011.

For more on the transformation process.