By:  Timothy Sutton, Communications Editor

Since February of 2011, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, as well as the office of the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, have been conducting investigations into Chipotle Mexican Grill’s compliance with employee work authorization laws and regulations. On May 17, 2012, Chipotle received a subpoena from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, requesting information regarding compliance with employee work authorization requirements, related public statements and other disclosures.

Failing their initial ICE audit exposed Chipotle to the SEC violations under investigation. Even though a year has passed since the company released immigration compliance disclosures to their investors, the current SEC investigation may lead to further fines and federal litigation. In February of 2011, the company filed a Form 8-K with the SEC stating,

“Our business could be adversely affected by increased labor costs or difficulties in finding the right employees for our restaurants.” Unauthorized workers are subject to deportation and may subject us to fines or penalties, and if any of our workers are found to be unauthorized our business may be disrupted as we try to replace lost workers with additional qualified employees. We could also experience adverse publicity arising from immigration-related enforcement activity that negatively impacts our brand and may make it more difficult to hire and keep qualified employees.”

The current SEC investigation has reopened the wound left by the ICE audits Chipotle endured over the past two years.  Following the ICE raids of 2010, Chipotle restaurants in Minnesota were issued a Notice of Suspect Documents identifying a large number of employees who appeared not to be authorized to work in the U.S. Employees who were unable to provide valid work eligibility documents were terminated. In December 2010, DHS requested work authorization documents for employees in the District of Columbia and Virginia. At that time, Chipotle filed a statement with the SEC in a Form 10-K stating:

“We believe our practices with regard to the work authorization of our employees, including the review and retention of work authorization documents, are in compliance with applicable law. However, the termination of large numbers of employees does disrupt our operations and results in a temporary increase in labor costs as we train new employees. It is not possible at this time to determine whether we will incur any fines, penalties or further liabilities in connection with these matters.”

The Department of Homeland Security, ICE, and the SEC’s investigation of Chiptole, sends a strong message to American employers that the U.S. government is relentless in its efforts to penalize employers of illegal aliens. ICE audits open the door to immigration, tax, and labor investigations that can cost employers (companies of all sizes – both private and public) millions in fines. In particular, this is a strong message to publicly held corporations that you must  take care now more than ever to ensure workforce compliance to avoid falling victim to an SEC probe.

As the mountain of immigration compliance trouble casts a shadow over Chipotle’s recent financial successes, further fines, penalties and liabilities levied by the SEC are sure to follow. For more updates on this matter subscribe to our RSS feed and for more information on how to avoid ICE audits and SEC investigations contact one of our immigration professionals at info@immigrationcompliancegroup.com or call 562 612.3996.

By:  Timothy Sutton, Communications Editor

The Hamilton Project, at the Brookings Institution held a forum on U.S. immigration on May 15, 2012. US Davis Economist, Giovanni Peri, purposed a radical overhaul to the entire immigration system. In short, Peri proposed a national auction system wherein employers bid for employee visas and proceeds of these sales fund local healthcare and education. The auction prices would be set with a reserve to ensure a minimal guaranteed income stream. Uncapped, the market would dictate the number of visas issued annually. This proposal seems to find a common ground between business needs and government regulation, benefiting the low-skilled labor market.

Auctioning low-skilled labor visas should help reduce the population of roughly 11.5 million illegal immigrants. Employers will be able to hire a legal workforce up to the point where auction prices for visas offset low wage savings. At that time, I-9 audits and workplace raids should continue to deter further hiring of illegal immigrants. This larger, stable and legal temporary workforce will help stabilize the economy. Changes are welcomed for companies like 3M that recently experienced a “brain drain.” 3M has been outsourcing science and technology jobs to Asia, citing the instability of the low skilled labor market they rely on to support their laboratories, manufacturing, research and development.

While Peri’s proposals are likely years away from actually being introduced into legislation, public officials like Senator John Cornyn continue to push for business friendly immigration. Senator Cornyn recently introduced legislation that would add 85,000 H-1B temporary visas issued annually to foreign-born engineers, mathematicians, scientists and other high-tech workers. Cornyn reminded the Senate, “We have to remember how this country was built. All of us are sons and daughters of immigrants that showed up here and made our way. We’ve cut off that flow.”

For continued coverage of proposed immigration reform and legislation, as well as the latest developments in immigration politics, subscribe to our blog and immigration and I-9 newsletters here.

Interested in staying current with I-9/E-Verify news and issues?  Check out our group on LinkedIn.

Please see our attached brochure and contact our office to discuss your compliance needs.  Our talented staff can walk you through our customized services and solutions.

By:   Timothy Sutton, Communications Editor

State legislatures in Kansas recently voted down a bill that would mandate all employers utilize the E-verify employment verification system. The federal government currently encourages employer’s voluntary participation in E-verify under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA). Although there are numerous benefits to participating in E-verify, blanket mandates burden all businesses regardless of size and resources. Legislatures across the country are proposing these mandates in an attempt to target employers who wish to remain “willfully blind” to their employees immigration status. The Kansas bill proposed excluding contractors who did not participate in E-verify from bidding on government contracts valued at $50,000 and above. When the bill failed by a vote of 84-35 businesses across the state heaved a temporary sigh of relief. Kansas will likely see this bill return in the near future, as the main deterrent for passing the bill was a lack of time and resources to adjust the state budget that takes effect on July 1, 2012.

Employers should be aware that although the federal government controls immigration laws, states are currently placing additional restrictions on employers adding additional layers of compliance measures aimed at reducing illegal immigrant populations. Controversial immigration laws passed by the state of Alabama, which mandate employer’s participation in E-verify, have sparked lawsuits by the Obama administration. Various industries are hit hard by such mandates including the agricultural industry.

Numerous farmers have prepared for a significant reduction in available labor by planting crops that can utilize machines to perform the work in place of immigrant laborers. H.B. 87, which recently passed in the state of Georgia, requires that all public employers and private employers utilize E-verify in advance of securing business licenses and permits. While these mandates appear to keep employers “honest,” in their hiring practices, they come at both an economic and social cost. Businesses bear the economic burden of compliance while minority populations pay the social cost of increased racial discrimination.

Mandates create an additional layer of workplace compliance that many small businesses lack the manpower and training to adhere to. Additionally, workplace verification screening without proper guidance by attorneys or employment specialists may lead to an increase in discriminatory employment practices. In light of the growing trend of state laws mandating E-verify participation, employers are encouraged to seek trained professionals for training and education on compliance with the law. For more information contact one of our immigration professionals at info@immigrationcompliancegroup.com or call 562 612.3996.

By Timothy Sutton, Communications Editor | Immigration Compliance Group

 Amendments to The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) in 1996 expose businesses to civil liability for knowingly hiring illegal workers. RICO was originally enacted to protect businesses from the influence of the mafia by allowing private enforcement of sanctions against violators of racketeering laws. Today, if a business employs illegal workers both (1) private individuals who are directly and adversely affected by loss or depression of wages due to employment of illegal workers and (2) businesses who are proximately harmed by a direct competitors employment of illegal workers may seek monetary sanctions including attorney’s fees under RICO. Simply, if you are employing illegal workers, your legally employed workers and your direct competitors may sue you for racketeering.

In Trollinger v. Tyson Foods, Inc., legally authorized workers filed a civil RICO class action against Tyson claiming the company and its recruiters had violated the INA by entering into an illegal hiring scheme to pay illegal aliens lower wages to increase profits. The workers claimed that their own wages had been depressed by Tyson’s immigration violations. Tyson prevailed after six long years of civil litigation because the plaintiff’s failed to establish a sufficient causation of their lost wages by Tyson’s hiring of illegal workers. However, this case set out the framework for employees to bring a lawsuit against their employer for hiring illegal workers under RICO.

Because the government holds private businesses accountable for enforcing immigration laws through I-9 compliance, E-verify and various Federal statutes, workplace compliance is essential to protecting your business. Businesses, not illegal workers are held accountable for fraudulent documents, misrepresentations of citizenship, and discriminatory hiring practices.

As “gatekeepers,” of immigration enforcement, employers have a de-facto duty to prevent illegal immigrants from securing employment. To ensure that your business is prepared for RICO lawsuits, ICE audits, and OSC hiring discrimination claims, contact one of our immigration professionals at info@immigrationcompliancegroup.com or call 562 612.3996.

Our Employer Resource Center is very informative – check it out.

We had the ICE IMAGE Training and Forum in Los Angeles last week on May 3rd where they explained the benefits of the IMAGE Program and followed up with releasing all the Powerpoint Presentations through email after the event.  They have made some excellent information available to the public on their website; namely:

1. An HSI I-9 Presentation
2. An IMAGE HSI Presentation
3. OSC IMAGE Event Presentation
4. Self Check User Presentation
5. E-Verify Presentation

We felt that their perspective on the above topics was critical information to  be shared and analyzed alongside your other resources.  They can be accessed here.

Please know that we are available to assist you with your compliance program and offer practical and sustainable services and solutions to assist you in establishing a compliant workforce.

By:  Timothy Sutton, Communications Editor

Like many successful restaurant managers, I worked my way up from the bottom of the employee food chain. That meant with each promotion from bus boy to manager, I was trained by other employees on how to do my job. By the time I became a General Manager, I erroneously believed that being a good manager meant being able to follow established procedures. I soon discovered that this was actually a recipe for disaster.

Auditioning a new waiter is a common practice in the restaurant industry. This entails observing an applicant voluntarily interacting with customers, taking orders, serving food and working with other employees. Typically, the audition ends with a free meal in exchange for the waiter’s time and parking validation if the restaurant is generous. Throughout the industry, restaurateurs believe that this practice limits their liability because the applicant has not yet become an employee in “volunteering,” their time to audition for the job.

However, the M-274 Handbook For Employers instructions on completing form I-9 (Employment Eligibility Form) classifies this practice of meals and parking reimbursement as remuneration: anything of value given in exchange of labor or services, including food or lodging. Because restaurant managers typically train one another on hiring practices, there is a perpetual false belief that auditioning waiters is a healthy hiring practice. According to the M-274, the work done in exchange for the value of a meal exposes restaurants to form I-9 non-compliance fines. Essentially, the audition becomes Day One of employment, which requires I-9 forms to be completed and retained.

If the applicant is not hired, both Section 1 and 2 of the I-9 form must be completed that same-day in order to comply with rules regarding employees retained for three-days or less. Without the proper knowledge and training on these I-9 compliance issues, managers expose their companies to thousands of dollars in fines by auditioning waiters. A successful manager goes beyond following the established procedures by having the foresight to seek professional guidance to ensure that company employment practices are in accordance with the law.

For fresh insight into how your business’s employment practices can become a recipe for success contact our office at info@immigrationcompliancegroup.com or call 562 612.3996.

Please refer to our informative Employer Resource Center for more, and here for a list of our services and solutions.

By: Timothy Sutton, Communications Editor                                                              

On May 3rd, 2012, the President reassured the nation of his dedication to reforming U.S. immigration policies. In his speech, President Obama insisted that upon re-election, he would immediately overhaul the current immigration system. Of late, the DREAM act, a pathway for un-documented students to achieve citizenship, has been at the forefront of immigration politics. But while politicians argue over issues regarding individual rights to obtaining U.S. citizenship, businesses are left wondering where they fit into the proposed immigration “system-overhauls.”

Over the last two years, the dramatic increase in I-9 audits by the current administration have been well documented on this and other blogs. Additionally, the White House website clearly outlines the President’s vision for immigration reform, “Demanding accountability for businesses that break the law by undermining American workers and exploiting undocumented workers.”

This week, HerbCo, an agricultural business in the state of Washington, received $1,000,000 in fines for hiring illegal workers. HerbCo Management also received sentences of five years probation after entering guilty pleas to the criminal charges against them. A week prior, a restaurateur in Oakland, California was sentenced to 41 months in prison for improperly reporting the wages of over one hundred illegal workers to the IRS.

These hefty penalties reflect the seriousness of President Obama’s demands for business accountability. If the pathway to legal citizenship becomes more accessible to children, will businesses shoulder more of the blame for facilitating the illegal immigration of their parents?  Business owners under the current political climate cannot afford workplace verification non-compliance. For more information on how to prepare your business for upcoming changes to the U.S. immigration system contact our office at info@immigrationcompliancegroup.com or call 562 612.3996.

By:  Timothy Sutton, Communications Editor

HerbCo International Owner Ted Andrews, Vice President David Lykin and General Manager Debra Howard will appear in Court on May 1, 2012, charged with re-hiring nearly two dozen of the 86 workers fired after an I-9 audit by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency back in February of 2011. A HerbCo employee tipped off authorities about the scheme to pay these 20 illegal workers roughly $40,000 in cash, despite being fired for non-conforming I-9 forms and failing to pass E-verify background checks.

During an ICE Audit of 334 I-9 forms, it was found that 214 employees had presented fraudulent documents.  All the employees listed in the social security “no-match letter” who were still employed, 86 of them, were terminated.

Under federal law, an employer is required to verify the identity and work authorization of every employee hired. However, there are limitations on how an employer can legally seek additional verification of documents they suspect to be fraudulent.

The HerbCo executives are expected to receive a year of probation for guilty pleas to their criminal charges. Prosecutors are seeking an additional $1M in fines from HerbCo, sending an obvious message to employers that hire illegal workers.

The US Attorney’s office stated the following regarding the amount of the fine, “Within the worksite universe of either the United States or the State of Washington, the defendants’ conduct appears unremarkable only because of the sheer numbers of other culpable employers who have not been prosecuted for similar conduct. Of 20 million illegal aliens residing in the United States and 230,000 in the State of Washington, 86 were employed at Herbco on April 15, 2011.”

For more information about how to safeguard your business from a costly I-9 audit, contact our firm at info@immigrationcompliancegroup.com or call 562 612.3996.

We  link to more on this, and here also.

One of the most important questions in the mind of both employer and employee is:  What if information about the employee is wrong – can they fix inaccurate information about themselves in E-Verify?

If E-Verify is unable to automatically verify an individual’s status in order to authorize employment, a Status Verifier will manually review the information and conduct searches of other Federal government databases and, where necessary, will update any underlying information contained within the various DHS databases queried.  After a result is returned on an employment authorization query, E-Verify provides two methods of information correction and redress for employees.  If an employee receives a Tentative Non Confirmation, or TNC, they may correct their information through the Social Security Administration (SSA) or DHS.

After the verification process is complete, individuals have the opportunity to access and correct their information through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or Privacy Act (PA) process.

We link to more E-Verify Privacy FAQs and our I-9 Employer Resource Center

Immigration Compliance Group specializes in business immigration and employer compliance matters related to audits, training and policy development.