Archive for the ‘ICE’ Category
Tuesday, May 1st, 2012
By: Timothy Sutton, Communications Editor
HerbCo International Owner Ted Andrews, Vice President David Lykin and General Manager Debra Howard will appear in Court on May 1, 2012, charged with re-hiring nearly two dozen of the 86 workers fired after an I-9 audit by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency back in February of 2011. A HerbCo employee tipped off authorities about the scheme to pay these 20 illegal workers roughly $40,000 in cash, despite being fired for non-conforming I-9 forms and failing to pass E-verify background checks.
During an ICE Audit of 334 I-9 forms, it was found that 214 employees had presented fraudulent documents. All the employees listed in the social security “no-match letter” who were still employed, 86 of them, were terminated.
Under federal law, an employer is required to verify the identity and work authorization of every employee hired. However, there are limitations on how an employer can legally seek additional verification of documents they suspect to be fraudulent.
The HerbCo executives are expected to receive a year of probation for guilty pleas to their criminal charges. Prosecutors are seeking an additional $1M in fines from HerbCo, sending an obvious message to employers that hire illegal workers.
The US Attorney’s office stated the following regarding the amount of the fine, “Within the worksite universe of either the United States or the State of Washington, the defendants’ conduct appears unremarkable only because of the sheer numbers of other culpable employers who have not been prosecuted for similar conduct. Of 20 million illegal aliens residing in the United States and 230,000 in the State of Washington, 86 were employed at Herbco on April 15, 2011.”
For more information about how to safeguard your business from a costly I-9 audit, contact our firm at info@immigrationcompliancegroup.com or call 562 612.3996.
We link to more on this, and here also.
Tags: HerbCo, I-9 Document Fraud, I-9/E-Verify News, ICE Audit, ICE Fines, ICE Investigation, illegal immigrants, Legal Workforce, Undocumented Workers
Posted in I-9/E-Verify News, ICE, Immigration News | Comments Off on I-9 Form: Herb Grower Faces $1M in Fines & Federal Criminal Charges For Hiring Illegal Immigrants
Friday, April 27th, 2012
One of the most important questions in the mind of both employer and employee is: What if information about the employee is wrong – can they fix inaccurate information about themselves in E-Verify?
If E-Verify is unable to automatically verify an individual’s status in order to authorize employment, a Status Verifier will manually review the information and conduct searches of other Federal government databases and, where necessary, will update any underlying information contained within the various DHS databases queried. After a result is returned on an employment authorization query, E-Verify provides two methods of information correction and redress for employees. If an employee receives a Tentative Non Confirmation, or TNC, they may correct their information through the Social Security Administration (SSA) or DHS.
After the verification process is complete, individuals have the opportunity to access and correct their information through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or Privacy Act (PA) process.
We link to more E-Verify Privacy FAQs and our I-9 Employer Resource Center
Immigration Compliance Group specializes in business immigration and employer compliance matters related to audits, training and policy development.
Tags: Department Of Homeland Security (DHS), E-Verify, E-Verify News, E-Verify Privacy, E-Verify Self Check, Employment Eligibility Verification, I-9, I-9/E-Verify News, I9 Policies, ICE, Legal Workforce, Worksite Enforcement
Posted in Department Of Homeland Security (DHS), I-9/E-Verify News, ICE, Immigration News | Comments Off on E-Verify Privacy Issues | News from Immigration Compliance Group
Thursday, March 15th, 2012
The OSC has provided a valuable resource in sharing their letter responses to various employment eligibility verification compliance inquiries from stakeholders. The topics include: Non-Discrimination Practices, Pre-Employment Inquiries, Form I-9 Document Abuse, SS No-Match Letters, Dishonesty/Falsification Issues, using acceptable language for job postings, and much more.
Here are a few citations:
Re: Question Concerning Re-Verifying Work Authorization when Discrepancies with SS are Discovered: “An employer is only under a duty to investigate further if it knows or has knowledge that would lead a reasonable person to believe that an individual is not authorized to work in the United States. There are many possible reasons for why an employee’s name and Social Security number may not match. Therefore, employers should not draw conclusions about an employee’s work authorization status based solely on information indicating that the employee’s name and Social Security number cannot be found in a system of records-whether the records are directly managed by the Social Security Administration or any other private or public entity. Furthermore, the mere receipt of a no-match letter or other no-match notice does not, standing alone, constitute ‘constructive knowledge’ on the part of an employer that the referenced employee is not work authorized. Only the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is legally authorized to conclusively determine an individual’s authorization to work. OSC also cautions employers against providing an unreasonably short period of time to clear up a Social Security no-match…” It it strongly recommended that you consult with a qualified attorney in employment-related immigration law before jumping to any conclusions that might possibly escalate into a very unpleasant scenario for all parties concerned.
Question re Modifying the List of I-9 Acceptable Documents: “Document abuse occurs when an employer either demands that a worker produce more or different documents than those identified in the Form 1-9 process, or refuses to honor documents tendered that on their face reasonably appear to be genuine, based on national origin or citizenship status. To the extent that an employee either inadvertently or mistakenly indicates an incorrect immigration status in Section 1 of the Form 1-9, the limitation of documents in Section 2 may prevent that employee from presenting valid documents) acceptable for 1-9 purposes. Similarly, if the list excludes one or more documents that an employee of a particular status may possess, the limitation of documents may also prevent that employee from presenting his or her valid documents) acceptable for 1-9 purposes.” We caution you to discuss issues such as this with experienced counsel in employment-related immigration matters before action is taken.
We trust that you will find this information useful as it relates to the enforcement of the anti-discrimination provision of the INA. Please check out a list of our compliance services and solutions. Please be reminded that we invite you to contact our office with your employment-related immigration matters (I-9 audits, training, policy development and more).
About the OSC: The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) enforces the anti-discrimination provision (§ 274B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b. his federal law prohibits: 1) citizenship status discrimination in hiring, firing, or recruitment or referral for a fee, 2) national origin discrimination in hiring, firing, or recruitment or referral for a fee, 3) document abuse (unfair documentary practices during the employment eligibility verification, Form I-9, process, and 4) retaliation or intimidation.
Tags: Employment Eligibility Verification, I-9 Anti-Discrimination, I-9 AUDIT, I-9 Document Abuse, I-9 Fines, I-9 Form, I-9 process, I-9 Training, ICE, Legal Workforce, OSC, SS No-Match Letters
Posted in I-9/E-Verify News, ICE, OSC, USCIS | Comments Off on Employer Compliance Technical Assistance Letters from OSC
Friday, March 9th, 2012
In a transcript released today of ICE Director John Morton’s testimony before the House Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Homeland Security Hearing on The President’s Fiscal Year 2013 budget request for ICE, the message was clear….ICE intends to keep the pressure on employers with a continued focus on I-9 audits this year, as stated below in his statement concerning worksite enforcement:
“We are focused on smart and effective enforcement of our immigration laws, including making sure that employers have the tools they need to maintain a legal workforce and face penalties if they knowingly violate the law.
Employment opportunities remain a primary motivation for aliens seeking illegal entry into the United States. By focusing on employers that are willing to hire illegal workers, we can eliminate the incentive that leads illegal aliens to violate our nation’s immigration laws. Since January 2009, ICE has audited more than 6,468 employers suspected of hiring illegal labor, debarred 521 companies and individuals, and imposed more than $76.4 million in financial sanctions. This focus will continue this coming fiscal year.
We have also established the ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers program (IMAGE) — designed to promote voluntary compliance, educate employers about best practices and help companies train their employees to comply with the nation’s immigration-related employment laws. Last year, ICE entered into IMAGE agreements with well-known companies, including Chick-fil-A, Smoothie King, Best Western, Toyota, Tysons Food, and Kelly Services, among others. These companies agree to use E-Verify, conduct self-audits, and submit to an ICE audit. In FY 2013, ICE will continue to expand IMAGE outreach nationwide and provide regional and local IMAGE training conferences to increase voluntary compliance among key employers.”
This information should come as no surprise to our readership, who are very well informed. We would, however, like to remind you that a good faith effort is the primary consideration by ICE when determining final penalties in their worksite audits and investigations. To establish a good faith effort, have an outside audit performed by an experienced professional to determine what problems you really have; correct your paperwork, get everyone properly trained; create a written SOP statement to get everyone on the same page and enlisted in the process of maintaining a compliant workforce; enrolling in E-Verify is also recommended.
We invite you to contact our firm regarding any compliance questions/issues that you have, 562 612.3996, or by email, info@immigrationcompliancegroup.com. Check out our Employer Resource Center at www.I-9Audits.com, and our list of services and solutions.
Tags: E-Verify, Employer Compliance, I-9 Audits, I-9 Form, I-9 Policy, I-9 Training, ICE, ICE Audits, ICE investigations, John Morton, Legal Workforce, SSA No-Match, Worksite Enforcement
Posted in I-9/E-Verify News, ICE | Comments Off on ICE Reminds us of Continued Focus/Pressure on Worksite Enforcement
Tuesday, March 6th, 2012
We have heard many recent reports that ICE will step up the pressure on its I-9 Field Agents to surpass the number of I-9 audits they performed in 2011, and that they will be looking at various industries such as employers in critical food, energy, and infrastructure industries. In June 2011, ICE did not specify which businesses would be specifically targeted, but did say that immigration agents would focus on seventeen sectors including agriculture, financial services, nuclear reactors, water treatment, and health care.
It has been recently reported by the Farm Employer’s Labor Service (FELS) that the EVP of NCAE (National Council of Agricultural Employers) was informed by credible sources that ICE field agents will once again focus their I-9 audit investigations on high-profile agriculture and restaurant employers to surpass their 2,496 I-9 audits and 3,291 work site enforcement cases conducted in 2011. More specifically, they are again (no surprise) targeting high-profile/maximum press coverage employers, the biggest farms and restaurants, and employers who were previously audited and/or had issues with DOL or DHS in the past – who can now expect to be be revisited in 2012.
With good faith effort being one of the most important rules applied in ICE enforcement audits and investigations, it is recommend that all employers get their ‘houses in order’ as it relates to I-9 employment verification eligibility compliance. We would strongly suggest that you put your emphasis on retaining an outside expert to perform a thorough I-9 audit of your active and inactive I-9 forms to really get a handle on problems and reoccurring issues buried in your I-9 forms. This step alone can save you hundreds of thousands of dollars, as well as the potential of losing employees and recruitment and re-training costs. Then get your staff trained and don’t let anyone not properly trained be involved with hands-on I-9 functions. Next, establish a written compliance statement outlining the SOP that your company will follow — a plan that makes sense for your business……then implement it, and be diligent in your efforts to create and maintain a compliant workforce showing a good faith effort to comply with I-9 regulations to the best of your knowledge and ability. Lastly, avail yourself of reliable information from skilled professionals that report on compliance issues – subscribe to a newsletter and a blog so that you can stay ahead of the game. You should check out our free information – both blog and newsletters.
We invite you to contact our firm to discuss your compliance issues, info@immigrationcompliancegroup.com or call 562 612.3996.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Immigration Compliance Group focuses its practice on corporate employment verification compliance and US and Canadian inbound business immigration. Our team has a depth of experience in providing uniquely tailored services and solutions to assist clients in developing comprehensive employment authorization and immigration-related compliance. We conduct onsite and offsite I-9 audits for companies of all sizes, design training curriculum to assure that staff is knowledgeable concerning the management of their I-9 program, and we assist with policy development so that our clients have a plan and strategy that assures their compliance in a manner that makes sense for their business and evidences their good faith in establishing a compliant workforce.
Tags: E-Verify, Employer Compliance, I-9, I-9 Audits, I-9 Form, I-9 Penalties, I-9 Training, I-9 Updates, ICE, ICE Agents, ICE Audits, Immigration Compliance Group, Legal Workforce, NOI, SSA No-Match, Worksite Enforcement
Posted in Department Of Homeland Security (DHS), I-9/E-Verify News, ICE | Comments Off on I-9 News Update: Industries that ICE is Targeting
Saturday, February 11th, 2012
1. Treat all people the same when announcing a job, taking applications, interviewing, offering a job, verifying eligibility to work, and in hiring and firing.
2. Accept documentation presented by an employee if it establishes identity and employment eligibility; is included in the list of acceptable documents; and reasonably appears to be genuine and to relate to the person.
3. Accept documents that appear to be genuine. You are not expected to be a document expert, and establishing the authenticity of a document is not your responsibility.
4. Avoid “citizen-only” or “permanent resident-only” hiring policies unless required by law, regulation or government contract. In most cases, it is illegal to require job applicants to be U.S. citizens or have a particular immigration status.
5. Give out the same job information over the telephone to all callers, and use the same application form for all applicants.
6. Base all decisions about firing on job performance and/or behavior, not on the appearance, accent, name, or citizenship status of your employees.
7. Complete the I-9 Form and keep it on file for at least 3 years from the date of employment or for 1 year after the employee leaves the job, whichever is later. This means that you must keep I-9s on file for all current employees. You must also make the forms available to government inspectors upon request.
8. On the I-9 Form, verify that you have seen documents establishing identity and work authorization for all employees hired after November 6, 1986, including U.S. citizens.
9. Remember that many work authorization documents (I-9 Form lists A and C) must be renewed. On the expiration date, you must reverify employment authorization and record the new evidence of continued work authorization on the I-9 Form. You must accept any valid document your employee chooses to present, whether or not it is the same document provided initially. Individuals may present an unrestricted Social Security card to establish continuing employment eligibility.
Note:
• Permanent resident cards should not be reverified
• Identity documents should not be reverified
10. Be aware that U.S. citizenship, or nationality,belongs not only to persons born in the United States but also to all individuals born to a U.S. citizen, and those born in Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, and Swains Island. Citizenship is granted to legal immigrants after they complete the naturalization process.
Please feel free to contact our office to discuss any compliance questions that you might have.
Resources:
Employer Resource Center
Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices
OSC: FAQs
Types of Immigration related Unfair Employment Practices Discrimination
Tags: Anti-Discrimination Employment Practices, Employer Ccompliance, EMPLOYMENT ELIGIBILITY, I-9 Documentation, I-9 Form, I-9 Verification, Legal Workforce, OSC
Posted in I-9/E-Verify News, ICE | Comments Off on 10 Steps to take to Avoid Immigration-related Employment Discrimination
Sunday, February 5th, 2012
It has been recently reported that ICE is launching another round of worksite investigations, but this time, returning to employers that have already been through a federal investigative audit in the last three years. We’ve not seen this before. Approximately 500 employers are being re-visited by ICE Special Agents to confirm that non-compliant activity identified during prior audits has been resolved.
Employers must make sure they are hiring only people who can work legally in the U.S. Businesses that previously have received warning letters or administrative fines may now be the subject of yet more fines if ICE Special Agents determine that the employer continues to make the same mistakes.
Bear in mind, that several Federal agencies have the authority to review your I-9 forms, these agencies consist of ICE, The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) and the DOL, Wage and Hour Division. Each of these agencies investigate violations in the I-9 process, and we strongly advise that employers need to be prepared for a visit from any one of them.
ICE has recently announced their enforcement related statistics in the area of I-9 compliance for 2011, as follows:
- 2,496 I-9 audits were conducted
- 3,291 worksite enforcement cases were initiated
- Criminally arrested 221 employers
- Issued 385 Final Orders for $10.4+ million in fines; and
- Debarred 115 individuals and 97 businesses
These enforcement statistics should indeed be troubling to employers, particularly given that they don’t reflect the number of ICE notices (such as the Notice of Discrepancies or Notice of Suspect Documents) that are sent to employers, who are otherwise compliant, but may have accepted fraudulent documents or whose employees may have purchased the identity of a US citizen for work authorization purposes, despite your best efforts. As a result of this, employers across the country have had to terminate thousands of employees and incur the expense of hiring and training new employees.
ICE expects to audit some 3,000 employers in 2012. We recommend that you hire experts in the field to conduct either a partial or full audit, depending upon your circumstances, train personnel who are charged with the processing of your I-9 forms, and develop a written policy statement that reflects your goals for remaining compliant.
Tags: E-Verify, Employer Compliance, I-9 AUDIT, I-9 Fines, I-9 News, I-9 Penalties, I-9 Training, ICE Audits, Immigration Compliance Group, Immigration News, Legal Workforce, NOI, Notice of Discrepancies, Notice of Suspect Documents, SSA No-Match, Worksite Enforcement Trends
Posted in Department Of Homeland Security (DHS), DOJ, I-9/E-Verify News, ICE | Comments Off on Update: What’s the Current Immigration Enforcement Climate?
Monday, January 30th, 2012
This brochure outlines some excellent Do’s and Don’ts pertaining to how to interact with employees during an ICE audit; however, these suggestions additionally apply to all audit situations such as outside 3rd party audits by attorneys or compliance experts, as well as internal self-audits.
It is recommended that you have an established procedure for interacting with employees whose I-9 forms require correcting; i.e, how to inform them that you are seeking information from them, what to communicate to them, and how much time to allow them to respond.
Should you wish to discuss the particulars of your compliance program, please feel to contact our office for more information.
::::::::::::::::::
Leslie Davis is the Managing Director of Immigration Compliance Group and is an expert in employer compliance matters. The firm also specializes in US and Canadian business immigration.
Tags: E-Verify, Employer Compliance, EMPLOYMENT ELIGIBILITY, I-9 Audits, I-9 Compliance, I-9 Corrections, I-9 Fines, I-9 management, I-9 process, ICE Audits, ICE regulations, Legal Workforce, SSA No-Match, Worksite Enforcement
Posted in I-9/E-Verify News, ICE | Comments Off on I-9 Best Practice Audit Recommendations from OSC
Friday, January 6th, 2012
The Justice Department has reached a settlement agreement with University of California San Diego Medical Center for $115,000 (one of the higher civil penalties we’ve seen) for a complaint filed on Dec. 6, 2011, alleging that the medical center failed to comply with proper I-9 Form employment eligibility verification processes for non-citizens who are authorized to work in the United States.
Specifically, the DOJ’s complaint alleged that UCSD medical center engaged in a pattern of subjecting newly hired non-U.S. citizens to excessive demands for documents issued by the Department of Homeland Security in order to verify their employment eligibility, but did not require the same of US citizens. The Immigration and Nationality Act’s (INA) anti-discrimination provision prohibits employers from placing unfair documentary burdens on work-authorized employees during the hiring and employment eligibility verification process based on their citizenship status or national origin. Clearly put, it is illegal to discriminate against work authorized individuals. You simply cannot specify which documents are to be presented. This is considered document abuse.
The medical center has taken appropriate action to ensure compliance with INA’s anti-discrimination provision and has received Department of Homeland Security/U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) training on the proper use of work authorization documents. They have also agreed to work with the DOJ to ensure compliance with proper I-9 processes across all University of California campuses, medical centers and facilities.
Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the medical center agrees to implement new employment eligibility verification policies and procedures that treat all employees equally regardless of citizenship status. In addition, the medical center has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $115,000, conduct supplemental training of its human resources personnel on their responsibilities to avoid discrimination in the employment eligibility verification process and work with the department to ensure compliance with proper employment eligibility verification processes across all University of California campuses, medical centers and facilities.
Heightened Enforcement Continues
During the past few years, we have seen unprecedented enforcement and legislative activity relating to Form I-9 and E-Verify worksite compliance. Since fiscal year 2009, ICE has audited more than 6,000 employers, debarred 441 companies and individuals, and imposed more than $76 million in financial sanctions. We have also seen an unprecedented increase in the number of enforcement actions brought about by the Department of Justice (DOJ) for discrimination in the I-9 process. The Office of Special Counsel (OSC) has robustly prosecuted claims of discrimination in the I-9 process resulting in fines and penalties against employers, as well as back pay to injured parties.
What employers need to know
You just cannot presume that the employees charged with managing your I-9 program are compliant with the law and adhering to anti-discrimination rules and regulations. If you are not training your employees, then you are turning a blind eye to establishing a compliant workforce, the consequences of which today are severe and expensive – not to mention the bad press that accompanies such an investigation.
Employers cannot request specific documents (such as a green card), reject documents that reasonably appear to be genuine and relate to the employee presenting them, request that employees produce more documents than are required or treat groups of applicants differently when completing the I-9 form. You must examine ANY acceptable document from List A that appears to be genuine and that relates to the worker, or a combination List B plus a List C document, regardless of whether or not
Let’s re-visit ICE’s list of best practices that include the following as a reminder to employers:
- Use E-Verify,
- Use the Social Security Number Verification Service (SSNVS) for wage reporting purposes
- Establish a written hiring and employment eligibility verification policy.
- Establish an internal compliance and training program related to the hiring and employment verification process
- Require the I-9 process to be conducted only by individuals who have received appropriate training and include a secondary review as part of each employee’s verification to minimize the potential for a single individual to subvert the process.
- Arrange for annual I-9 audits by an external auditing firm or a trained employee not otherwise involved in theI-9 process.
- Establish a protocol for responding to letters or other information received from federal and state government agencies indicating that there is a discrepancy between the agency’s information and the information provided by the employer, such as SSA “No-Match” letters
- Establish and maintain appropriate policies, practices and safeguards to ensure that authorized workers are not treated differently with respect to hiring, firing, or recruitment or referral for a fee or during the Form I-9, E-Verify or SSNVS processes because of citizenship status or national origin.
- Maintain copies of any documents accepted as proof of identity and/or employment authorization for all new hires.
For more, refer to:
1) DOJ Press Release
2) DOJ Press Release on one of the largest settlements against a major healthcare system
3) Our list of services and solutions
__________________
About Immigration Compliance Group
For those of you who may be first time readers, Immigration solutions provides US and Canadian business immigration services to employers and individuals and additionally provides a full range of I-9 employment eligibility compliance services for employers that require I-9 audits, training, and compliance policy development.
Tags: DOJ, E-Verify, Employer Compliance, Employment Eligibility Verification, Healthcare, I-9 Audits, I-9 Discrimination, I-9 Fines, I-9 management, I-9 News, I-9 Penalties, I-9 Training, I9 Document Abuse, ICE, Immigration Compliance Group, Legal Workforce, OSC, SSA No-Match, UC San Diego Medical Center
Posted in DOJ, Healthcare, I-9/E-Verify News, ICE, Staffing Agencies | Comments Off on Form I-9 Discrimination | CA University Medical Center Pays $115,000
Monday, January 2nd, 2012
Five states as of January 1, 2012 require certain employers to use the E-Verify system for employment eligibility verification of newly hired employees. They are as follows:
Alabama: State contractors are required to e-verify new employees. Commencing April 1, 2012, all Alabama employers will b e required to use E-Verify. Business licenses can be suspended up to 60 days for a first violation and permanently revoked for a second violation.
Georgia: All private employers with 500 employees or more must use E-Verify as of 01/01/2012 for all new hires. This will expand to on July 1, 2012 for employers with 100-499 employees, and for employers with 11-99 employees as of July 1, 2013. Contractors can be barred from bidding on public contracts for 12 months for violations. Public employers must submit annual compliance reports.
Louisiana: All private employers seeking public contracts to provide services to a state or local public entity will be required to attest that they will use E-Verify for their new hires in Louisiana as of January 1, 2012 during the term of the contract, and the same for their subcontractors. Penalties for violations include: up to $500 fine per worker for a first offense, up to $1,000 for a second and up to $2,500 for a third offense. After the third offense the business license can also be suspended for a minimum of 30 days and no more than 6 months. Employers using E-Verify are presumed to be in good faith and not subject to penalties.
South Carolina: All employers are required to participate in E-Verify as of 01/01/2012. Presently, employers have had the option to hire only employees that possess or qualify for a South Carolina driver’s license (or other state license with similar strict requirements) instead of using E-Verify, but that option will expire as of 01/01/2012.
Tennessee: All private employers with 500 or more employees must either use E-Verify, or obtain and copy specified documentation of lawful status for all new hires as of January 1, 2012. those with 200 to 499 employees on or after July 1, 2012; those with 6 to 199 employees, on or after January 1, 2013. Employers with less than 6 employees will not have to use E-verify.
For current information on state E-Verify requirements, we link here
Should you have any questions pertaining to state E-Verify requirements, please contact our office at info@immigrationcompliancegroup.com or call 562 612.3996.
Tags: E-Verify, E-Verify News, Employer Compliance, EMPLOYMENT ELIGIBILITY, Five States Implement E-Verify, I-9 Form, Immigration Compliance Group, Legal Workforce, SSA No-Match
Posted in I-9/E-Verify News, ICE | Comments Off on E-Verify Requirements for 5 States as of January 1, 2012