DHS employees are being asked to volunteer for assignments at U.S. diplomatic missions to help State Department officials review applications for visas.

The assignments, “some of which are located in high-threat areas,” would last at least 30 days, the notice states.

ICE agents already are posted in a dozen countries to weed out applications from potential terrorists or criminals, but the new notice seeks people to conduct in-depth background checks and write intelligence reports. Federal officials told CNN they would back up State Department officials who lack law-enforcement experience to look for security threats.

After meeting with his homeland security and counterterrorism team Tuesday, Obama told reporters that the government “has to do better” to stop attacks like the December 25 attempt to blow up Northwest Airlines Flight 253.

Additionally, U.S. anti-terrorism officials are pushing to get more air marshals on American jetliners and beef up efforts to screen visa applicants overseas after some stinging criticism from President Obama.

Internal notices issued Tuesday and Wednesday by the Department of Homeland Security is asking employees to step up to train as air marshals and to serve at U.S. diplomatic posts abroad. Both moves follow Obama’s call for immediate reforms to prevent the kind of “potentially disastrous” failure involved in the unsuccessful attempt to bomb a U.S. jetliner on Christmas Day.

First they were arrested and faced deportation under what has proven to be the Obama administration’s only workplace raid.  Then they were given work permits and told they could stay in the USA while their employer was prosecuted…

Now, the more than 2 dozen undocumented workers arrested during the February raid are again facing deportation.

The deportations and likely removals are a conclusion to a case that displeased both advocates for illegal immigrants and those who lobby for stricter immigration enforcement.

In this case – the company, the workers and even the Seattle US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office that conducted the raid came in for some sort of punishment or special scrutiny

Shortly following the raid, ICE officials traded urgent emails going over Q&A sent by an apparently miffed White House, according to emails obtained by the AP through a federal records request.

In all, 27 workers have been deported; 7 have been allowed to leave the country voluntarily and 15 await court dates with an immigration judge, said ICE spokeswoman Lorie Dankers.

Read more

[Courtesy of Tracker Corp]    On November 19, 2009, DHS announced issuance of 1,000 additional I-9 Audit notices to employers across the country, focusing in particular on those providing critical infrastructure and other key resources. This is on top of the 654 I-9 audit notices issued earlier this year. Speaking at a workforce symposium in Washington, DC, Assistant Secretary John Morton (of Immigration and Customs Enforcement [ICE]) reiterated the agency’s commitment to creating a culture of voluntary compliance through aggressive investigations and outreach programs. Assistant Secretary Morton also provided recent statistics, showing the increased level of investigations and fines:

DHS also released statistics from the 654 notices sent in July 2009. The ICE agents identified roughly 14,000 suspect documents, assessed over $2 million in fines, and issued warnings to 326 employers.

We link to the press release announcing these findings.  We link to more details on the locations of the 1,000 companies in the latest round of audits

Cite as “AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 09112060 (posted Nov. 20, 2009)”

Reported in Computerworld

USCIS officials are taking H-1B enforcement from the desk to the field with a plan to conduct 25,000 on-site inspections of companies hiring foreign workers over this fiscal year.

The move marks a nearly five-fold increase in inspections over last fiscal year, when the agency conducted 5,191 site visits under a new site inspection program. The new federal fiscal year began Oct. 1.

Tougher enforcement from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services comes in response to a study conducted by the agency last year that found fraud and other violations in one-in-five H-1B applications.

In a letter to U.S. Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), Alejandro Mayorkas, director of the Citizenship and Immigration Services, said the agency began a site visit and verification program in July to check on the validity of H-1B applications. Mayorkas’ letter was released on Tuesday by Grassley.

“The inspection program determines] whether the location of employment actually exists and if a beneficiary is employed at the location specified, performing the duties as described, and paid the salary as identified in the petition,” said Mayorkas in his letter to Grassley.

…As part of its enforcement effort, Mayorkas said the Citizenship and Immigration Services has hired Dunn and Bradstreet Inc., which provides credit reports among other services, to act as “an independent information provider” and help verify information submitted by companies hiring H-1B workers.

Links to other related articles:

ICE Asst. Secretary Announces 1,000 New Workplace Audits

Anger up, Visas Down

Tech workers take H-1B case to supreme court

Share your thoughts with us on this.

This is an extremely informative Q&A session between AILA and  USCIS that addresses the following major  topics:

1)  Excessive documentation requests for L-1 RFEs including L-1Bs involving placements at 3rd party sites

2)  H-1B Cap Exempt employers

3)  Right of Counsel for H-1B Site Visits…..and more

To highlight a few USCIS responses:

1) AILA provided examples to USCIS of explaining its RFE requests by providing examples (rather than endless lists of mandatory documents) of how to respond

2)  Re Counting periods of time abroad for L-1 Eligibility:  USCIS stated,  “Contrary to the AFM, precedent decisions and long practice, USCIS now states that only time in the US in L status, rather than any ‘authorized periods of stay in the US for the foreign employer’, does not interrupt the prior year of employment.

3)  Right to Counsel during the course of audits and site visits & training for Investigative Officers:

a.  “USCIS is in the process of amending several forms (Form I-129 instructions) and receipt notices to advise that USCIS may conduct compliance site inspections at any time pre or post adjusication.  There are currently no plans to provide advance notice of a site inspection conducted under the ASVVP”.

b.  Advance notice is provided by FDNS officers when conducting site visits/administrative inquiries on cases containing elements of suspeced fraud unless the officer believes that advance notice would jeopardize or hamper the site visit.  FDNS officers also provide notice to attorneys of record when conducting site visits under the Benefit Fraud Assessment and Compliance Program.

c.  Are petitioners/beneficiaries informed of their right to call their attorney and have the attorney present before questioning commences?  “Participation in an ASVVP compliance site inspection/any USCIS site visit, is volunary”.

d.  “A petitioner/beneficiary/other persons will be allowed to contact their counsel if they are immediately available (in person or by phone), however, such contact should not unduly delay the process or entail unusual accommodations in which case the site inspection or site visit may be terminated”.

e.  Site visits will not be rescheduled if an attorney cannot be present.  If the employer’s attorney is not available, the Inspector will note this in their report.  The report will be reviewed for follow-up action, if appropriate.

4)  Site Visit Officer Training:  “Training is provided to site inspectors and immigration officers during their basic training after their entry on duty.  The inspectors collect and report information which is then analyzed by immigration officers who do have appropriate immigration law training.”

Other topics in this report covered termination of empoyment authorization documents, I-130 denials that are appealed, Civil Surgeons training and monitoring, etc.   Well worth the read through.

We link to the Q&A document

The House of Raeford Farms must pay a $1.5 Million fine and overhaul its hiring practices under an agreement that will allow a subsidiary to avoid prosecution on federal immigration charges.

The deal will also let two indicted managers at the poultry company’s Greenville, SC plant avoid criminal records, provided they enter a probationary program.

The settlement signed by federal prosecutors and company officials just hours before the case was set for trial Tuesday, gives the employer’s subsidiary, Columbia Farms, an opportunity to keep its record clean.  It likely ends a legal clash that could have cost the company millions of dollars in federal poultry contracts. Last year, Columbia Farms was charged with intentionally hiring illegal immigrants.

Under the settlement, Immigration will dismiss charges against the company if it improves its hiring practices over the next 2 years and submits to federal monitoring at its 8 plants in the Carolinas and Louisiana.  For more on this story

It has been reported that some 20,000 more unannounced employer site visits will be taking place over the next few months by FDNS, but this time it will be to employers who have filed H-1B extensions to determine if there is ongoing compliance by the employer.

It’s been asked, do they have the legal right to do this – just show up and demand to speak with a company’s representative or executive officer?  Yes, they do, although it hasn’t been acted upon to the extent we are now observing until your $500 Fraud Detection and Prevention government filing fee created the revenue to employ some 6,500 FDNS agents.  Up until now, USCIS or DOL agents have always been in a position to do onsite employer visits when they thought necessary – but it’s been rarely acted upon.  Presently, you can add ICE and FDNS to this group – because we’re in a hunt ‘em down, enforcement climate – and it’s the employers who are being targeted.

So, how does an employer handle this?  We don’t recommend that you wait to ask this question and to get your documentation organized when the agent comes knocking.  This is serious business now, and they are not just targeting the small to medium-size employer or the employer who has financial issues and can’t respond to requests to prove the ability to pay the offered wage to the employee.

Therefore, it is recommended that you discuss this with your immigration counsel now.  If you don’t have a representative, we are available to walk you through a program that will not only assist you in organizing your Public Access information and files, but we will give you the tools to prepare the company representative that will handle the agent site visit and to prepare them for the questions that will be asked, what documentation should be organized now and beeasily accessible to present to the agent when requested – and overall, how to successfully respond to a government site visit at your place of employment.

Assistant Secretary for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) John Morton announced standardized Memorandums of Agreement (MOAs) with 67 state and local law enforcement agencies to participate in 287(g) partnerships-improving public safety by prioritizing criminal aliens who are a threat to local communities, ensuring consistent and uniform policies and providing a force multiplier for ICE’s immigration enforcement efforts across the country.

The media has been all over this story as it concerns the Maricopa County Sheriff Arpaio meltdown when the Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano ordered him to stop arresting suspects based solely on the fact that they are illegal aliens. The Arizona sheriff who has been called the “toughest” in America, defiantly said he will continue his sweeps which have netted thousands of illegal aliens. He says that he can still operate within the law, under Arizona human smuggling laws – and told reporters, “it’s all politics”.

The new ICE partnerships include the Jail Model, in which local law enforcement agencies designate Jail Enforcement Officers to identify aliens already incarcerated within their detention facilities who are eligible for removal, as well as the Federal Task Force Model, in which agencies designate officers to work with Federal agents in locating, processing and removing criminal aliens from the United States.

• 55 agreements have been signed by ICE and the partnering agency;
• 12 agreements have been reached and await approval by the local jurisdiction’s supervisory authority; and
• Six agreements have negotiations underway.
• Six jurisdictions did not re-sign the new 287(g) agreement or withdrew during negotiations for a variety of reasons, including implementation of the Secure Communities program, budgetary constraints and limited program utilization.

We link to the ICE News Release for more on this story.

The complete title of this study is “Breaking the Immigration Stalemate: From Deep Disagreements to Constructive Proposals”.  The study was done by The Brookings-Duke Immigration Policy Roundtable at Duke University.  They describe themselves as an interdisciplinary “think and do” tank committed to understanding and addressing real-world ethical challenges facing individuals, organizations and societies worldwide.

This is an excellent study that in the end, they feel they were able to agree on a set of recommendations that address the most vexing and controversial issues stymieing immigration reform.

The study proposes 6 policy changes. These changes include emphasizing enforcement at the workplace, setting standards for the legalization of illegal immigrants and establishing an independent Standing Commission on Immigration.

The October 6 event featured the release of the Roundtable’s report and a discussion of the proposals and the potential pitfalls to achieving them. The report is the result of months of deliberation by the Roundtable, a joint project of the Brookings Institution and the Kenan Institute for Ethics. Roundtable members represent a broad spectrum of conflicting views from across the “pro-immigration” and “restrictionist” divide, but have nonetheless come together in support of this single set of recommendations.

We link to the Summary of this report, and for more reading with full audio of the event go here.