Follow Us:

Archive for the ‘H-1B Visas’ Category

Immigration Solutions | NewsBYTES for Week 8/2/2010

Friday, August 6th, 2010
  1. Want to stay in touch?  The InFOCUS Immigration Solutions August newsletter is available for your viewing here.
  2. We link to an interesting letter to President Obama on Immigration Reform that says it all very well
  3. USCIS to permit EAD (Employment Authorization Documents) to be expedited through the Nebraska Service Center (NSC) if they have been p ending for more than 60 days under particular circumstances.  Please contact our office for more information on this should you require assistance with expediting your case.
  4. Department of State announces that they will phase in the implementation of an online, electronic Immigrant Visa form, the DS-260 that will eventually replace the DS-230 form. Federal Register 75 FR 45475.
  5. Just yesterday, the US Senate passed a border security spending bill containing a provision that will be paid for by increasing fees for employers that have a large H-1B or L-1 foreign worker presence in their workforce. Specifically, the bill would increase total filing and fraud prevention fees by an incredible $2000 or more for petitioners with a U.S. workforce of more than 50 percent H-1B or L-1 nonimmigrants. The provision would be applicable to employers with 50 or more employees in the United States. The bill would also provide $600 million in emergency funds to increase security along our borders with Mexico by hiring more than new 1,000 border patrol and immigration enforcement officers, and increasing unmanned drone surveillance operations in the region.  For more on this
  6. The USCIS will start receiving email inquiries on I-90 and N-400 forms if the wait time has exceeded the designated processing times.
  7. The Department of Labor (DOL) bans the Asian Journal from the H-1B Program and agrees to pay $516, 500 in back pay to 32 employees plus a $40,000 penalty.

:::::::::::::::::::::

Immigration Solutions has thousands of worldwide subscribers interested in our news and services who are visiting our website and Blog daily.  We invite you to take advantage of this additional targeted exposure and strongly consider advertising your product or service with us.  Contact us through our website or give us a call to discuss your needs and advertising requirements.  We’ll walk you through a very affordable process that will give you the extra edge that you’re looking for.

Breaking News| USCIS Leaked Memo Presents Alternatives to Immigration Reform

Sunday, August 1st, 2010

The Obama Administration is considering ways that it could act without Congressional approval  – some options to provide immigration relief, should comprehensive immigration reform legislation not pass.

In an internal memo to Alejandro N. Mayorkas, the Director of USCIS, from the Offices of Chief Counsel and Policy and Strategy lay out some suggestions that USCIS might undertake within the current structure of the law without having to wait for Congress to pass legislation. Some of the key suggestions include the following:

1. Provide work authorization for H-4 dependent spouses if the H-1 applicant has an application for permanent residence and has extended beyond the 6 year limit. Currently H-4 dependents have to wait for the filing of an I-485 application to get work authorization, however, that can’t be done unless the priority date is current.

2. Expand the ‘dual intent” doctrine to non-immigrants such as TN’s, F-1, O and P and E visa holders. This could be especially helpful for applicants in TN status (such as registered nurses) who have delayed filing an I-140 petition because of concerns about traveling since TN is not currently a “dual intent” status.

3. Create a grace period ranging from 45 to 90 days for most of the non-immigrant categories. This would be especially helpful for H-1B applicants who wish to do an H-1B transfer if they lose a job and soon find a new job.  Currentf law holds the person to be “out of status” and subjects the H-1B applicant to returning to their home country to get a new visa stamped.

4. Eliminate unlawful presence (3 year and 10 year bar) for adjustment of status applicants. This would allow applicants who are subject to the bar on re-entry to freely travel and re-enter the U.S. to resume their application.

5. Expand premium processing to all employment-based cases. USCIS noted that they do not have a current backlog in cases so they are equipped to expand their premium processing unit.

6. Utilize deferred inspection to applicants whose removal is not in the public interest. This allows a “stay” in the U.S. to buy time for the applicant to have some form of legislative relief in the future.

7. Expand the EB-5 investor visa program. This program provides permanent residence to foreign nationals who invest in a U.S. business that creates at least 10 jobs, however, the program has been underutilized. The USCIS views this program as an important tool to revitalize the U.S. economy.

8. Extend work authorization on EADs when an extension is filed. This would allow automatic 240-day work authorization for an applicant who files an EAD extension before the current one expires. Currently the renewed EAD must be approved by the time the current one expires for the foreign national to continue to lawfully work.

USCIS believes these options are immediately at their disposal or can be quickly implemented through notice in the Federal Register based upon current authority. There is no word yet whether USCIS will implement these suggestions.

Supporters of comprehensive immigration reform are certain to welcome any effort by the Obama administration to unilaterally open pathways to citizenship for many currently in the country illegally. But the draft is also sure to outrage immigration-restriction groups.

Christopher Bentley, a USCIS spokesperson, said that internal memos help the agency “do the thinking that leads to important changes; some of them are adopted and others are rejected” and that “nobody should mistake deliberation and exchange of ideas for final decisions.”

::::::::::::::::

Immigration Solutions provides US and global visa services to individuals and employers throughout the USA and abroad.  We specialize in business immigration and have a depth of experience in the IT, health care, sports, and arts & entertainment, amongst others.

To stay in touch with us, see below.

Blog: http://www.immigrationsolution.net/immigration-solutions-blog/

Podcasts: http://feeds.feedburner.com/ImmigrationSolutionsPodcast

Follow us on Twitterhttp://twitter.com/immigration_biz

LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/immigrationsolutions

Employers Challenge Neufeld Memo and File Lawsuit | and other News

Thursday, June 10th, 2010

As reported by the Legal Action Center (AILA).  Broadgate et al. v. USCIS et al., No. 1:10cv00941 (D.C.D. filed June 8, 2010)

Three employers (software developers and IT services firms) and two not-for-profit trade associations are challenging the Neufeld memo in federal district court. The plaintiffs allege that USCIS issued the memo in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act’s notice and comment requirements; that USCIS failed to perform a Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis; that the memo is inconsistent with existing regulations addressing the employee-employer relationship and the term “contractor” and conflicts with the plain language of the INA; and that it is arbitrary and capricious. Plaintiffs ask the court to preliminarily and permanently enjoin USCIS from implementing the memo.

AILA sent a detailed letter to USCIS Chief Council, Roxana Bacon, in which it expressed concern about the substance of the January 8, 2010 H-1B memo and noted that its issuance was in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act’s notice and comment requirements. The letter primarily focuses on recent USCIS decisions that unlawfully find that individuals with controlling or substantial interests in a petitioning U.S. company or its foreign parent company cannot — in most cases — be a beneficiary of a nonimmigrant or immigrant employment-based petition.

We will continue to keep you posted on this topic.

::::::::

USCIS Proposes Fee Increase

USCIS has published a Proposed Rule in the Federal Register to increase immigration fees.  The cost of applying for a green card will increase from $930 to $985.  The application fee for a family petition (I-130) will be $420, up from $355.  The cost of an I-140 employment-based petition will rise over $100 and premium processing fees will increase by 22.5%.  The application for employment authorization would increase to $380 from $340. A separate fee for fingerprints and other biometrics with many applications would increase to $85 from $80.  Among several new fees, officials said, will be a $6,230 charge for foreigners proposing to invest $500,000 or more in businesses to create jobs in the United States.

The NY Times reports that Alejandro Mayorkas, director of  USCIS, said the fee increase was necessary because declining applications for documents in the past two years had lowered revenues and left his agency — which is 90% financed by fees — with a budget shortfall of about $200 million for the coming fiscal year.

The increases come as Congress has put off immigration legislation and an Arizona law that makes it a state crime to be in the country illegally goes into effect July 29.

The timing makes Clarissa Martinez wonder what message the fee increases sends to immigrants trying to take a legal path into the country.  “It begs the question of Congress: If we want these people to take these steps, we have to make sure that we’re not pricing them out of their reach,” said Martinez, director of immigration and national campaigns for the National Council of La Raza, a Hispanic civil rights group.

::::::::

If you’d like to stay in touch with our office and sign up for our information, blog and news, you can do so here. You can follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn here.

Senate Dems to give Commission Authority over Immigrant Visas

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

As reported in the Washington Post 5/24/2010

Democrats crafting an overhaul of U.S. immigration laws are bringing a new approach to a long-stalled debate: giving a federal commission some power over the future flow of legal foreign workers.

Senate Democratic leaders are drafting a measure to authorize a commission to recommend levels of employment-based visas and green cards that let immigrants work legally in the United States. The plan would require Congress, in certain cases, to vote when immigrant labor is deemed out of line with demand. Although the commission would have limited influence over the skilled-immigrant market for technology and other industries, it would have a major role in regulating low-skilled foreign labor.

The commission idea originally came from Ray Marshall, Labor Secretary under President Jimmy Carter. The United States needs a nonpartisan panel that would use “rigorous” data analysis in its decisions, Marshall said in an interview.

The idea is another example of lawmakers showing a willingness to relinquish decision-making to commissions on issues that include reducing the federal debt, Iraq war policy and curbing Medicare costs.

“It’s the ultimate expression for the need for political cover,” said Ross Baker, a political science professor at Rutgers University.

Legislation being drafted by Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) is expected to take a different tack, said a Schumer aide, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The panel they envision would have a stronger role in deciding immigrant-worker levels in lower-skilled occupations — such as hotel and restaurant jobs — than in higher-skilled ones.

We’ll see how all this plays out and will continue to report on any and all immigration reform measures.

If you’re an employer that despite your efforts to hire US workers, must rely on foreign workers to grow your business, sign this petition and send it to your representatives and then pass the link along.

H-1B’s and Short-Term Placement

Monday, April 5th, 2010

An employer may make “short-term placement(s) or assignments” to new places of employment in areas of intended employment not listed on the original LCA w/o filing a new LCA. Short term placements may occur only under certain conditions for strictly limited periods.

1)      The employer has satisfied all obligations under the existing LCA covering the H-1B worker

2)      There is no strike or lockout at the new worksite in the occupational classification of the H-1B worker; and

3)      The employer continues to pay the required wage based on the original LCA and also pays all lodging, travel, meals and incidental or misc expenses associated with the worker’s stay at the new location, for both workdays and non-workdays.

Short-term placement at any worksite or combination of worksites in a new area may not exceed 30 workdays in a one-year period, or under certain circumstances, 60 workdays.  Workdays counted toward the limit may be nonconsecutive and may be at different specific worksites within the area of employment.  Weekend, holiday or other non-workdays do not count.  Thus, the 30-workday limit would typically be about 6 weeks.

It is recommended that you obtain the advice of an experienced immigration attorney who understands this issue. If you are not a client of our office and would like to be, please contact me directly.

Leslie Davis, Managing Director
Immigration Solutions
D 562 612.3996
Our News: http://www.immigrationsolution.net/newsletter-April-2010.php

Unpaid Leave in H-1B Classification

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

In this economy, we’ve received countless phone calls asking about this issue.  Putting an employee on leave (or “benching”) because you have no assignment for them does not relieve the employer from continuing to pay salary.  Doing so will expose you and your company to some very heavy-handed judgments, such as being assessed to pay back wages, benefits, and penalties on top of this.

As contract work becomes harder in this economy, particularly for those that work in the IT sector for an IT consultant or staffing agency, employers must protect themselves, even if it means that sometimes you must let a valuable employee go.

Per H-1B reguations, employers are required to pay full salary to the employee even during non-productive time.

If you have questions concerning this issue or require the expert services of our firm, please contact us today.

Leslie Davis, Managing Director

Immigration Solutions |  info@immigrationsolution.net |  562 612.3996

USCIS Announces 2nd Mtg on the Neufeld Memo 3/26/10

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

We have been advised that USCIS will hold a 2nd in-person and teleconferenced meeting on the above topic on Friday, March 26th at 3:00 (Eastern). We link to a copy of the Meeting Invitation that contains the RSVP information.

The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) sent a letter to USCIS, requesting that the January 8th “Neufeld memo” on the “employer-employee relationship” be withdrawn listing four key problems.

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Here’s an update with some new developments in re the H-1B Memo:

1. The memo is a new policy that is inconsistent with current regulations: The regulations already define “employer” for H-1B context and indicates control when the employer “may hire, pay, fire, supervise, or otherwise control the work of any such employee.” The Memo adds additional requirements beyond what the regulations state.

2. The position taken by USCIS imposes significant economic burdens on business, at a time when the government should be trying to encourage business growth, in that employers will be required to spend considerable time and money gathering additional evidence to file their H-1B petitions and/or respond to RFE’s. Also, AILA pointed to several studies of the positive economic impact of H-1B employment, including a study that found that “U.S. technology companies increase their employment by an average of five U.S. workers for each H-1B worker they hire.”

3. The memo will have serious adverse affects on employers and individuals: AILA pointed to state restrictions on physicians being employed directly by hospitals and to locum tenens and other temporary staffing arrangements in the health care arena (including therapists) where it will be difficult to satisfy the new standards of the memo. AILA also pointed to government contracts as not being able to meet the standards. The memo will also negatively affect H-1B workers who change employers or extend status, and may have adverse effects on permanent residence petitions. AILA noted that it is not just the H-1B petitioner and the H-1B visa holder that are impacted — the end-users are also affected as they may experience a disruption in work for an H-1B worker that is not able to timely extend status or when additional staffing is needed.

4. The policy is spreading to other non-immigrant and immigrant petitions: AILA noted that USCIS has been adjudicating L-1 petitions and I-140 petitions based upon this new, heightened standard of the employer-employee relationship.

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

For those of you who might have missed the Immigration Solutions teleconference that we had on “Tougher Standards for H-1B’s”, you can access the audio recording here.

If you would like to share with us any recent experiences you’ve had or your input as to how this Memo has impacted your business, please feel free to do so.

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Lastly, we are available to assist you with your H-1B filings and have developed some smart approaches as to how to deal with these new regulations and document requirements. Contact us today. If you file your own H-1B cases and require consultation or a skilled attorney to review your petitions, we also offer these services.

VisaScreen: English Requirement Waived for Certain Renewal Applicants

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

Beginning March 1, 2010, VisaScreen renewal applicants who can demonstrate employment in the United States in the health care profession that is designated on their International Commission on Healthcare Professions VisaScreen certificate do not have to take another approved English exam for renewal of their VisaScreen certificate if the following criteria are met:

1)  The period of employment must be for at least 27–36 months, including nine months of the year before the date an applicant submits the renewal application.

2)  They will need to have their employer submit an employment summary on corporate letterhead with the appropriate signature for the English requirement to be waived.

CGFNS has made the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services aware of this policy change.

CGFNS is an immigration-neutral, nonprofit organization based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, and is an internationally recognized authority on the education, registration and licensure of nurses worldwide. CGFNS’s mission is to provide responsible leadership in the delivery of relevant services to the global nursing and health care community. The organization was founded in 1977 through a collaborative effort by representatives from the U.S. Department of Labor; Department of Health, Education and Welfare (now the Department of Health and Human Services); the Immigration and Naturalization Service; and representatives from nursing organizations, including the American Nurses Association and the National League for Nursing.

For additional information about CGFNS and its services, contact: CGFNS International, 3600 Market Street, Suite 400, Philadelphia, PA 19104-2651 USA; telephone: +1 (215) 222 8454.

VisaScreen Healthcare Certification Updates

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

VisaScreen® renewal:

VisaScreen® certificate holders who have not obtained a permanent U.S. visa are required to renew their certificates within five years of the issue date. VisaScreen® renewal certificate applicants should begin the process six months before their current certificate expires. The renewal fee is
$250 USD. The renewal application is available for download at www.cgfns.org/files/pdf/apps/VisaScreenReApp.pdf or applicants may apply online through CGFNS Connect.

Expedited Review Service:

Service for VisaScreen® to include applicants who have an offer for employment, in addition to those who have a Request for Evidence or a deportation deadline regarding their U.S. visa application.

VisaScreen® applicants are eligible for this Expedited Review Service only I they have met the criteria of Section 343 of the Illegal Immigration Reform Immigrant Responsibility Act; we have received all required documents and we have received a copy of their Request for Evidence, deportation deadline or offer for employment accompanied by a completed CGFNS Expedited Review Service form.

To apply for the Expedited Review Service, eligible VisaScreen® applicants will need to call CGFNS Customer Service between the hours of 8am and Noon, U.S. Eastern Time, to receive instructions. (see contact info below)

We will need the items requested above with an online credit card payment of $500. CGFNS will then perform the necessary review within five business days and, if all requirements have been successfully met, issue a VisaScreen® certificate via UPS next day air. Applicants who are ineligible for a VisaScreen® certificate based on the review will be notified. Fees for the Expedited Review Service are not refundable.

CGNS increases prices on its services:

CGFNS International announced on 21 December 2009 a new pricing structure for core services and several ancillary services.  Applications for the Certification Program, the Credentials Evaluation Service, the VisaScreen®: Visa Credentials Assessment program, the Credential Verification Service for New York State and ancillary services received on or after 1 January 2010 will be charged according to the new fee schedule.

The updated 2010 fees can be found here.

Contact Information:

CGFNS Customer Service* +1 (215) 349 8767
Automated Voice Response Telephone System +1 (215) 599 6200
Appointments* +1 (215) 222 8454
Mailing address Suite 400, 3600 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-2651
CGFNS Web site http://www.cgfns.org
CGFNS Connect https://www.cgfns.org/cerpassweb/intro.jsp
Apply/Check Status https://www.cgfns.org/cerpassweb/intro.jsp
Email https://www.cgfns.org/cerpassweb/processContactUs.do

H-1B Filing Tip #3

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

When the Occupation Requires a License

USCIS’ approval of an H-1B petition that requires a license, is not authorization for the employee to practice his or her profession without the required license.  USCIS regulation provides that if an occupation requires a state or local license to fully perform the duties of the occupation, the foreign worker must have the license prior to the approval of the petition.

This can be a Catch 22….Some states will not issue a state license unless the individual worker presents evidence to the State Board that they are legally authorized to be employed in the USA.  Some State Boards require the worker to establish to the State Board that they have been granted H-1B status as a prerequisite to issuing the license.  For example, certain State Boards of Pharmacy will not issue a pharmacist license until the worker presents evidence of work authorization.  Teachers have been unable to obtain licensure until they obtain social security numbers which cannot be achieved until one is authorized to work in the USA.

With the above being said, USCIS adjudicators have been instructed to approve H-1B petitions for a one-year period if a State or local license to engage in the profession is required, and the appropriate licensing authority will not provide such license to the worker without evidence that  that they have been granted H-1B status.  At the end of the one-year period, the employer is required to file another petition with a request for extension and also present evidence at that time that state licensure has been obtained.

As a condition to approving petitions involving state or local licensure, the worker must demonstrate that he or she has filed an application for the license according to the State or local rules and procedures and provide evidence that they are qualified to receive the license, and that all educational, training experience and other requirements are met, including healthcare certification, at the time of filing the petition.  For instance, Physical Therapists must provide a letter or statement signed by an authorized state physical therapy licensing official in the state of intended employment, indicating that the PT is qualified to take the state’s written licensing examination for physical therapists and thereafter obtain state licensure.

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

If you are not a client of our firm and would like to discuss H-1Bs as well as any other immigration matters, we invite you to contact us.  My email address is leslie@immigrationsolution.net, telephone is 562 612.3996.  If you’d prefer to request a consultation, you can do so here