We are seeing with  increasing frequency, particularly in the hospitality, restaurant and contracting industries, the collaboration between the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD) and ICE concerning the recent rash of I-9 audits and work site investigations.  We think this is for a myriad of reasons:

1)      Not meeting employee minimum wage requirements

2)      Non-conformance with H-2B temporary labor certification regulations

3)      Mis-classifying workers as independent contractors

4)      Hiring undocumented workers

5)      I-9 document violations; and

6)      A high volume of uncontested E-Verify Non-confirmations

In September a meeting took place between immigration attorneys and representatives from the USCIS Verification Division to discuss updates with E-Verify.  It was discussed that The Office of Special Counsel and E-Verify have signed an MOU to share information  between the two agencies, enabling the OSC to increase its role in the enforcement of E-Verify policies, specifically related to discrimination and employer use of the E-Verify system.

E-Verify is particularly monitoring employers that are suspected of misusing the system for pre-screening purposes or who appear to be providing data that is inconsistent with the size of their business and their usage of the E-Verify system.

If you’re an employer and you receive a Notice of Inspection (NOI) or a Subpoena, it is highly advisable that you contact an attorney that specializes in employer compliance issues before you provide any documentation whatsoever to ICE agents, DHS, or DOL.

For more information on E-Verify, we link to the Quick Reference Guide for E-Verify Employer Agents and to the E-Verify menu on the USCIS website.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Immigration Solutions provides US and global visa services to individuals and employers throughout the USA and abroad.  We specialize in business immigration and have a depth of experience in the IT, health care, arts & entertainment, and sports industries, amongst others.  Our services include complex business visas for investors, multinational managers, skilled professionals and outstanding individuals in science, business, education, athletics and entertainment.  We additionally provide employer compliance consulting services on proper I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification) auditing, training, and work with our clients to develop compliant immigration policies and procedures.  We offer these services, as well, to government contractors and advise on FAR E-Verify enrollment and compliance issues.

USCIS has released a new 97-page E-Verify User Manual for Federal Contractors today.  What with ICE announcing all time record breaking highs on Employer Worksite Investigations for 2010, now is the time to act upon getting your I-9’s in order, particularly if you know that there are paperwork violations buried in them and particularly if you know that you’ve had turnover in personnel that are charged with handling your I-9’s.  Please see our previous Blog entry on this topic today.

Our compliance team can plan and structure a project to your needs that will ease the uncertainty of going through a partial or full audit of your I-9 employee population.  We ask all our clients and readership to strongly consider consulting with us, if you haven’t already, to discuss the management of your employee verification program, policy and procedures.

This is becoming serious business for human resource professionals, particularly if you know that you have paperwork violations buried in your I-9’s…AND….you’ve had turnover with the staff that are charged with handling I-9’s …and lastly, none of your staff has ever received formal I-9 compliance training.

Our compliance team can plan and structure a project to your needs that will ease the uncertainty of going through a partial or full audit of your I-9 employee population.  We ask all our clients and readership to strongly consider consulting with us, if you haven’t already, to discuss the management of your employee verification program, policy and procedures.  Please see today’s announcement from ICE.

In April 2009, Secretary Napolitano announced changes to ICE’s worksite enforcement strategy – which reduced the need for large-scale immigration enforcement actions where employees were arrested and instead focused on finding evidence to criminally charge employers and to increase the use of tools like I-9 audits, fines and debarment.

• This year, ICE criminally charged a record-breaking 180 owners, employers, managers and/or supervisors – up from 135 in FY 2008 and 114 in FY 2009.
• ICE conducted more than 2,200 I-9 audits – up from more than 1,400 in FY 2009.
• Since January 2009, ICE has imposed approximately $50 million in financial sanctions.
• ICE debarred 97 business and 49 individuals in FY 2010, up from 30 and 53, respectively, in FY 2009

Here’s an associated announcement from Secretary Napolitano.

We would urge you to be proactive in this area and put the matter of a “pre-audit”  I-9 audit on your agenda, or request training from us as to how to conduct your own internal audit.

Senate Dems Robert Menendez (NJ) and Patrick Leahy (VT) introduced the CIR Act of 2010 that proposes major  overhaul to the immigration system, making changes in employment and family-based programs with enhancements to I-9 (employment eligibility verification) employer obligations.  Most feel that this will not be the avenue by which CIR is accomplished, but that many of its ideas, including those int the CIR ASAP Bill that was introduced by Luis Gutierrez (D/IL) and the REPAIR proposal introduced by Senators Schumer (D-NY) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) earlier this year, will all be considered when Congress decides to get serious about tackling immigration reform and actually start debating the issues.

The Bill does propose the creation of an Immigration Commission that would have authority to recommend yearly NIV and IV numerical limits.

The Bill proposes changes to the H-1B program by requiring employers to post the job opening on a new DOL website.  Employer with 50 or more employees would be prohibited from petitioning for additional H-1B workers if their workforce was comprised of more than 50% H-1B and L-1 workers, excluding those who are the beneficiaries of a pending or approved labor certification or employer-based immigrant petition.  Additionally, employers would be prohibited from placing H-1B workers at a 3rd party site, unless the worker was primarily supervised and controlled by the petitioner/employer.

DOL would be charged with additional authority to review LCA’s for fraud or misrepresentation and would have up to 14 days to certify an LCA (makes one wonder if we’d ever get a case out the door!)  with additional authority to investigate complaints against H-1B employers and to conduct employer H-1B compliance audits.  This is yet another reminder to employers to make sure that their Public Access Files are in order and that they are working with immigration attorneys who provide them with PAF files and overall compliance guidance and training.

Proposed changes to the L-1 Program would include requiring employers to offer L-1 employees insurance and other benefits on the same basis as that offered to US workers.  Increasing restrictions would be imposed on “new office” L-1 petitions and would require DHS to submit a report to Congress on L-1Blanket use.  On the positive side, the bill wold provide some relief for small employers seeking L-1A status for foreign nationals.  It would forbid adjudicators from using the small size of an L-1 employer as a negative factor in executive or managerial eligibility for L-1A status, but would increase DHS authority to investigate complaints against L-1 employers and impose new penalties upon employers who violate L-1 regs.

*** (Relief for Registered Nurses) *** — The Bill proposes to create a new H-2C temporary, nonimmigrant visa for occupations for which there is a shortage of American labor.  The initial H-2C visa would be valid for three years and renewed for three more years. With some exceptions, an H-2C visa could be revoked if the visa holder has been unemployed for more than 60 days.  After 4 years, an H-2C non-immigrant may file an application for adjustment of status, provided that he/she has been continuously employed, establishes progress toward civics and English proficiency, meets all criminal and other background checks and pays additional fines and fees.

There is a proposal to include a new H-1C program for lesser-skilled workers with job offers from US employers, and the creation of a premium processing program for administrative appeals of employment-based immigrant petition denials.

Relief for Undocumented Immigrants: Creates a provisional legal status, Lawful Prospective Immigrant (LPI), for undocumented immigrants who are present in the U.S. as of September 30, 2010, register with the government, have never committed a serious crime, and are otherwise admissible to the United States.  LPI status will be initially valid for four years, with the possibility of extensions.  LPI status confers work and travel authorization.  After six years in LPI/LPID status, an applicant may apply to become a lawful permanent resident, provided he or she continues to meet all eligibility requirements, including renewed biometrics and background and security checks, and also establishes basic citizenship and English skills, payment of all taxes, and compliance with Selective Service registration.

Employment-based Immigrant Petitions: The bill would recapture unused employment and family-based visa numbers from 1992 to 2007, and implement for future years  that unusued immigrant visa numbers roll over each fiscal year including the base amount of 140,000 –  plus numbers from 1992-2007 – and any unusued numbers from the previous year.  Those with approved visa petitions who are subject to wait times would be eligible to apply for AOS upon payment of an additional $500 filing fee and would be entitled to 3-year EADs and travel documents.  Those with pending immigrant visa petitions would be eligible to apply for AOS at the discretion of DHS.

We link to a complete summary of the CIR Reform Act from Immigration Policy Center.

Immigration Solutions will continue to update and report on any and all CIR issues as they arise.

The Meg Whitman scenario playing out in the news the last few days, is a good opportunity to address this issue and just how exactly the SSA No-Match Letter process works.

If the combination of name and SSN on a Form W-2 can not be matched to an SSA record, SSA is unable to attribute the earnings to a worker’s record. There are a number of reasons why reported information may not agree with our records, such as typographical errors, unreported name changes, inaccurate or incomplete employer records or misuse of an SSN.

What is a No-Match Letter?

After SSA processes the wage reports submitted by the employers, they attempt to resolve items that cannot be matched by sending letters to employees, employers and self-employed individuals to inform them when a reported name or SSN does not match SSA’s records. These letters are referred to as “no-match” letters and their purpose is to obtain corrected information to help SSA identify the individual to whom the earnings belong so that the earnings can be posted to the individual’s earnings record.

No-match letters fall under two categories:

• Employer No Match Letters — These letters may also be referred to as Employer Correction Request or Educational Correspondence (EDCOR) letters; and

• No Match Letters sent to workers whose earnings could not be credited to SSA’s records are referred to as Decentralized Correspondence or DECOR letters.

SSA began sending no-match letters to workers in 1979 and to employers in 1994.

Who gets a No-Match Letter?

When SSA processes wage reports, it notifies every worker whose name and SSN could not be matched to SSA’s records. This letter is sent to the address on the worker’s Form W-2. If there is no address or an address is not found in the Postal Service database of valid addresses, this letter is sent to the employer. The new DHS regulation does not address these letters.

Employer Notices (EDCOR)

Approximately two weeks after the release of the worker letters, SSA sends employer no-match letters. Currently, these are sent to any employer who reported more than 10 no-matches that represented more than 0.5% of the W-2s submitted by that employer.

The Employer notice advises of the no-matches and asks for corrected information.

Employer notices can list up to 500 SSNs (no names) that could not be matched (the employer can contact SSA for a full list if there are more than 500 errors). The employer is asked to prepare Forms W-2c (Corrected Wage and Tax Statement) for each of the SSNs listed in the Employer notice that the employer is able to correct.

If you are enrolled in E-Verify and receive a TNC

When a Tentative Non-Confirmation (TNC) is issued, the employer must notify the employee of the TNC and give the employee the opportunity to contest that finding.  If the employee chooses to contest the SSA TNC, he or she has eight business days to visit an SSA office with the required documents to initiate the process to prove identity and support the correction of the SSA record. Until the TNC is resolved, even if it takes longer than eight days, the employee must be allowed to keep working and cannot be fired or have any other employment-related action taken against him or her because of the TNC.  If the employee fails to contact SSA within the eight day contest period, the employee is considered a no show and a final non-confirmation is issued by E-Verify.  At this point, the employer should discuss this situation with their immigration attorney and seriously consider terminating employment.  A recent electronic business process enhancement, EV-STAR, allows SSA to use the E-Verify system to inform the employer of the case resolution once the employee visits SSA and resolves the issue.

For employees who successfully resolve a TNC, correcting SSA records is a useful result of the E-Verify process, helping individuals identify and resolve problems with their Social Security records. The work done to update records to resolve an E-Verify mismatch would need to be done at the time the individual applies for Social Security benefits.

Here is a sample of the E-Verify Referral Notice to the Employer when there is an SSS No-Match.  For more information on this topic, we link to our website where we have our employer compliance resource center and list of services and solutions for employers.

Fines Based Upon Inadequate Electronic I-9 System used to Track Worker Eligibility

Abercrombie & Fitch has been fined $1,047,110 in a settlement reached today with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ((ICE) for numerous technology-related deficiences in the company’s electronic I-9 system.

Referencing the ICE Press Release, the settlement is the result of a November 2008 Form I-9 inspection of Abercrombie & Fitch’s retail stores in Michigan.  The company was fully cooperative during the investigation and no instances of the knowing hire of unauthorized aliens were discovered. Since the initial inspection, Abercrombie & Fitch has taken measures to revise its I-9 Electronic Compliance Program, and has begun to implement new procedures to prevent future violations of federal immigration laws.

“Employers are responsible not only for the people they hire but also for the internal systems they choose to utilize to manage their employment process and those systems must result in effective compliance,” said Brian M. Moskowitz, special agent in charge of ICE HSI for Ohio and Michigan.  “We are pleased to see Abercrombie working diligently to complete the implementation of an effective compliance system; however, we know that there are other companies who are not doing so. This settlement should serve as a warning to other companies that may not yet take the employment verification process seriously or provide it the attention it warrants.”

With the above being said — this is a definite attention getter!  There’s alot of I-9 software on the market.  Some we’re familiar with – and others we are not.  Electronic I-9 software must adhere to certain recordkeeping standards and technical safeguards in order to ensure that the underlying I-9s are accurate, authentic and trustworthy.  Systems must retain the same sequence of data elements on the paper I-9.

The main point here is to recognize that your I-9 system is a compliance system which must serve a unique  compliance function.  Yes, we know that you want the fancy tools and flagging systems, but the essential fundamentals are critical. We like the following questions provided by LawLogix’ electronic I-9 team:

1. Will the vendor provide third party independent evaluation of the system (preferably by an attorney with deep I-9 experience)?
2. What type of guarantees does the vendor provide in the contract (e.g., indemnification for gross negligence)?
3. Is the vendor able to provide 5 similarly situated client references that use the same I-9 system?  This is an important one and will speak directly to how well the vendor is supporting their product, releasing  updates, responding to constant changes in I-9 policy and procedure.  You should ask the references whether or not they have been subjected to an ICE audit using the vendor’s system and how quickly the vendor was able to respond to ICE demands.

Conducting your due diligence goes without saying – don’t believe all the hype re bundled in legal services.  LawLogix, who we are familiar with and highly recommend, state that there is no “one size that fits all”.  Careful planning is required and discussion with trusted immigration counsel advisable prior to any decisions being made.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

If you’d like to schedule a time to discuss your I-9s, whether that be a randomly selected or full audit, staff training or working with you to establish a set pf policies and procedures around handling your I-9 compliance, we offer solutions and services both onsite or offsite by our talented and trained legal compliance team.  Give us  a call.  562 612.3996 – www.employer-compliance.com

1. Want to stay in touch?  The InFOCUS Immigration Solutions August newsletter is available for your viewing here.
2. We link to an interesting letter to President Obama on Immigration Reform that says it all very well
3. USCIS to permit EAD (Employment Authorization Documents) to be expedited through the Nebraska Service Center (NSC) if they have been p ending for more than 60 days under particular circumstances.  Please contact our office for more information on this should you require assistance with expediting your case.
4. Department of State announces that they will phase in the implementation of an online, electronic Immigrant Visa form, the DS-260 that will eventually replace the DS-230 form. Federal Register 75 FR 45475.
5. Just yesterday, the US Senate passed a border security spending bill containing a provision that will be paid for by increasing fees for employers that have a large H-1B or L-1 foreign worker presence in their workforce. Specifically, the bill would increase total filing and fraud prevention fees by an incredible $2000 or more for petitioners with a U.S. workforce of more than 50 percent H-1B or L-1 nonimmigrants. The provision would be applicable to employers with 50 or more employees in the United States. The bill would also provide $600 million in emergency funds to increase security along our borders with Mexico by hiring more than new 1,000 border patrol and immigration enforcement officers, and increasing unmanned drone surveillance operations in the region.  For more on this
6. The USCIS will start receiving email inquiries on I-90 and N-400 forms if the wait time has exceeded the designated processing times.
7. The Department of Labor (DOL) bans the Asian Journal from the H-1B Program and agrees to pay $516, 500 in back pay to 32 employees plus a $40,000 penalty.

:::::::::::::::::::::

Immigration Solutions has thousands of worldwide subscribers interested in our news and services who are visiting our website and Blog daily.  We invite you to take advantage of this additional targeted exposure and strongly consider advertising your product or service with us.  Contact us through our website or give us a call to discuss your needs and advertising requirements.  We’ll walk you through a very affordable process that will give you the extra edge that you’re looking for.

DHS finalized a regulation that provides greater flexibility for employers to electronically sign and store I-9 forms, which are used by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to verify employment eligibility-eliminating the need for paper filing and streamlining efforts to ensure a legal workforce nationwide.

Employers—who complete and retain the Form I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification)—may sign the form electronically and retain the form in an electronic format.

More in the final rule:

1)  DHS will allow competing paper and electronic systems:  This clarifies that an employer moving to an electronic system need not create digital images/data related to historical paper forms. However, from some employer’s perspective monitoring two distinct verification systems for compliance may be too difficult a logistical challenge. These particular employers have elected to go entirely electronic to take advantage of the ability to monitor compliance and provide for electronic reminders. We strongly recommend that employers should continue to approach converting paper I-9s to electronic images very carefully, first discussing the benefits as well as the concerns (in particular audit related and privilege issues) with their immigration attorneys.

2)  The final rule reaffirms that employers will not be required to use a specific technology to complete and store I-9 information, so long as the system they use ensures accessibility and they are able to produce a reasonable facsimile or copy of the I-9.

3)  The final rule will also relax the audit trail requirement from the interim rule so that employers no longer have to keep records of when the information is accessed or viewed. Instead, an audit trail will only need to include information on the the initial completion and any subsequent modification to the I-9.

4)  The final rule will also relax the interim rule’s requirement to provide a transaction record to the employee at the time the electronic I-9 is created. Under the rule to be published tomorrow, the employer may “provide or transmit a confirmation of the transaction only if an employee requests it . . . within a reasonable period of time.” Finally, the final rule will remove the mandate that the electronic storage system be searchable “by any data element,” requiring only an indexing system that “permits the identification and retrieval for viewing or reproducing of relevant documents and records maintained in an electronic storage system.”

5) Indexing does not require all fields:   The final rule identifies that not all of the “data element(s)” must be searchable, but that the system must provide a sense of “searchability” consistent with the amended 8 CFR Sec. 274a.2(e)(6).

More information about I-9 forms and Employment Eligibility Verification is available on the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services website at www.uscis.gov/I-9.

For further guidance on the electronic signing and storage of the I-9, and the changes to the current regulations to assist businesses in complying with the requirements of the law, please visit www.ice.gov or view the Federal Register at www.gpoaccess.gov.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

What can Immigration Solution do for you?

Our firm’s years of experience and knowledge with employer compliance and worksite enforcement issues can assist your business in offsetting the extent of sanctions and other ICE enforcement threats.  Because of this, employer compliance is becoming more complex and enforcement (investigations and audits) is increasing.

In order to effectively deal with these issues and avoid the very severe consequences for non-compliance, employers must take the time to develop a strategy and be prepared in advance with an Immigration Compliance Program. Immigration Solutions has created a package of services and solutions to assist you with your compliance procedures that can be tailored to your specific needs and concerns.  Contact our office should you wish to discuss your audit, training and compliance needs.

Big changes are coming to E-Verify in June that will enhance its usability, security, accuracy and efficiency. The USCIS has announced that its newly redesigned E-Verify web interface will go live on June 13, 2010. As previously reported, the new E-Verify look (internally called E-Verify 3.0) promises to offer “a clean and modern design, easy and intuitive navigation, and clear and simple language.  A new home page, a new case alerts feature, improved case management and a streamlined tutorial are among the dozens of improvements coming to E-Verify.

Check out the new E-Verify Redesign section of the website to learn more about what’s coming and what E-Verify users can do to prepare.

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

USCIS Revises EAD Card (Employment Authorization Document) – Effective June 4th

What does this mean in the I-9 context?   The EAD Card (or Form I-766) is an acceptable List A document, which establishes both identity and work authorization. It’s important to note, however, that the EAD is evidence of temporary work authorization which expires at some point in time. Before that expiration occurs, employers need to re-verify the employee’s continuing eligibility to the work in the US. (in Section 3 of the form) in order to avoid penalties and other issues.  Most employers storing pen & paper I-9s utilize a ticker or calendar system for reminders, while those with electronic I-9 systems will receive automatic email reminders and prompts for re-verification.

The EAD is also noteworthy for employers participating in E-Verify, since it is one of two documents (the I-551 green card being the other) which must be photocopied and retained by the employer during the I-9 process. This photocopy requirement, outlined in the E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding, enables employers to use the E-Verify photo matching tool to compare the document against DHS records. For more information on the photo tool, please visit this brief outline here.

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Immigration Solutions has created a package of services and solutions to assist you with your compliance procedures that can be tailored to your specific needs and concerns.  Today is the time to develop a strategy and be prepared in advance with an Immigration Compliance Program that simply outlines how your company will manage its employer compliance responsibilities.

California-based client receives FAR E-Verify contract language and waits until the 11th hour to get their I-9’s in order:

In order to properly enroll in the DHS FAR E-Verify free Internet-Based program, or a vendor-based Designated Agent program, the contractor must rely upon the accuracy of their I-9’s and the information provided by their employees on the I-9 form.  We recommend a proactive approach to this issue by obtaining a pre-EVerify I-9 audit (can be a random audit or a complete audit depending upon the condition of your I-9s) to pinpoint reoccurring issues and correc them – with accompanying I-9 compliance training and the establishment of policy and procedure around how your company will handle this function – then you’re ready to enroll in E-Verify.

If you have questions or require any of the above services, our distinguished team of attorneys and specialists are available to work with you on your compliance needs.

Leslie Davis, Managing Director
Immigration Solutions