ICE announced today the launch of its newly redesigned website, ICE.gov. The new website features the latest ICE news information and an enhanced media/image gallery. The new ICE.gov also includes in depth information about the ICE Office of Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) and the ICE Office of Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO).

The new site also features ICE’s Online Detainee Locator System (ODLS), a public, Internet-based tool, designed to assist family members, attorneys and other interested parties in locating detained aliens in ICE custody. The ODLS was launched on July 23, 2010.

We are seeing with  increasing frequency, particularly in the hospitality, restaurant and contracting industries, the collaboration between the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD) and ICE concerning the recent rash of I-9 audits and work site investigations.  We think this is for a myriad of reasons:

1)      Not meeting employee minimum wage requirements

2)      Non-conformance with H-2B temporary labor certification regulations

3)      Mis-classifying workers as independent contractors

4)      Hiring undocumented workers

5)      I-9 document violations; and

6)      A high volume of uncontested E-Verify Non-confirmations

In September a meeting took place between immigration attorneys and representatives from the USCIS Verification Division to discuss updates with E-Verify.  It was discussed that The Office of Special Counsel and E-Verify have signed an MOU to share information  between the two agencies, enabling the OSC to increase its role in the enforcement of E-Verify policies, specifically related to discrimination and employer use of the E-Verify system.

E-Verify is particularly monitoring employers that are suspected of misusing the system for pre-screening purposes or who appear to be providing data that is inconsistent with the size of their business and their usage of the E-Verify system.

If you’re an employer and you receive a Notice of Inspection (NOI) or a Subpoena, it is highly advisable that you contact an attorney that specializes in employer compliance issues before you provide any documentation whatsoever to ICE agents, DHS, or DOL.

For more information on E-Verify, we link to the Quick Reference Guide for E-Verify Employer Agents and to the E-Verify menu on the USCIS website.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Immigration Solutions provides US and global visa services to individuals and employers throughout the USA and abroad.  We specialize in business immigration and have a depth of experience in the IT, health care, arts & entertainment, and sports industries, amongst others.  Our services include complex business visas for investors, multinational managers, skilled professionals and outstanding individuals in science, business, education, athletics and entertainment.  We additionally provide employer compliance consulting services on proper I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification) auditing, training, and work with our clients to develop compliant immigration policies and procedures.  We offer these services, as well, to government contractors and advise on FAR E-Verify enrollment and compliance issues.

As reported by AILA (The American Immigration Lawyers Association), the Department of State (DOS) Visa Office has confirmed at the March 24, 2010, AILA/DOS Liaison meeting that the Kentucky Consular Center (KCC) has commenced verification of information contained in nonimmigrant visa petitions received from the USCIS (AILA InfoNet Doc. 10072868). Verification of information includes telephonic contact with petitioners related to factual aspects contained in the petition.

Background:

On November 17, 2007, DOS instructed consular posts that they must verify the details of approved NIV petitions through the Petition Information Management Service (PIMS) via the Consular Consolidated Database (CCD). Consular officers access the details of approved nonimmigrant visa petitions through the CCD in a PIMS report, which links an approved petition to a base petitioner record allowing superior tracking of NIV petitioner and petition information. The electronic PIMS record created by the KCC is the primary source of evidence used by consular officers to determine nonimmigrant visa (NIV) petition approval. In addition to the information submitted by the petitioner on the I-129, many of the PIMS reports also contain information from DOS’ Fraud Prevention Unit (FPU). The FPU performs research on petitioners, and as part of a pilot project, the FPU, on a random basis, verifies factual aspects related to the beneficiaries and their proposed U.S. employment.

Petitioner Reviews:

AILA has been advised that lack of information on the petitioner in the USCIS Computer Linked Information Management System (CLAIMS) system has resulted in DOS’ decision to create a base petitioner record as part of the PIMS report for all first time petitioners. To create this base petitioner record, the KCC verifies petitioner information contained in the petition including, but not limited to, review of the company website, company contact information, and use of Google earth to confirm that an office exists in an appropriate physical location. Once the base petitioner record is complete, the KCC will not normally re-verify the petitioner information for two years.

Beneficiary Reviews:

The DOS has also informed the AILA DOS Liaison Committee that the KCC has initiated a pilot program for verifying information related to beneficiaries and proposed U.S. employment. These checks are completed at random and are primarily completed through telephonic contact with petitioners. The telephonic contact by KCC is unannounced and should be anticipated to occur shortly after the petition is transferred to the KCC from the USCIS.

Once the review is completed, the findings of the beneficiary review are normally finalized within two days and available to consular officers. Consular officers are instructed to review the report, question the beneficiary regarding any discrepancies, and request that the KCC correct any information if a finding was in error. If the discrepancies were not in error, the consular officer will provide additional information to the KCC to update their report to include any additional incriminating evidence discovered during the course of the nonimmigrant visa interview.

The FPU has designated 15 contractors who have been authorized by the DOS to conduct these telephonic beneficiary reviews with petitioners. These contractors are authorized to contact the Petitioner and may request to speak to an authorized official. They will then ask a series of questions verifying certain information contained in the approved nonimmigrant visa petitions.

These include, but are not limited to:

1. Whether the petitioner, in fact, submitted the petition;

2. When was the petitioner incorporated

3. Where was the physical location of the petitioner

4. Number of employees

5. Names of shareholders

6. Location of Attorney of Record

7. General information regarding the petitioner’s operations and business plan

We’d like to provide employers with the following information and tips in handling these inquiries:

Request the name of the KCC contractor and confirm the credentials of the contractor with the KCC [(606) 526-7500] prior to providing any information.

1. Contact our office to advise us of the telephonic contact by the KCC contractor.
2. Do not speak with government agents or contractors without a witness present.  Both the witness and the interviewee should prepare notes of what questions were asked and label them “Privileged and Confidential/Prepared at the Direction of Counsel,” and submit them to our office for review and retention.
3. Retain complete copies of your I-129 petitions and supporting documents in a confidential file maintained by the designated company official for easy access during a contractor call.
4. Never guess at the answer to a question about the petition.  If the employer is unsure about some requested information, the employer should indicate that he/she will follow up with the KCC contractor to provide accurate information after such information is obtained.

Employers are reminded that the investigations conducted by the KCC are separate and apart from the investigations conducted by the Fraud Detection and National Security Unit (FDNS) of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).  DHS will continue to conduct its own fraud investigations using the FDNS unit.  FDNS conducts site visits of petitioning employers in an effort to combat fraudulent petitions.  Employers are reminded to contact our office if they receive a site visit from a Department of Homeland Security contractor.

The day following President Obama signing Public Law 111-230, the fee increase on H-1B and L-1 visas became effective (August 14, 2010) through September 30, 2014.

What exactly is this law and what does it stipulate? It requires the submission of an additional fee of $2,000 for certain H-1B petitions and $2,250 for certain L-1A and L-1B petitions postmarked on or after August 14, 2010.  We were surprised that this announcement  which our office just saw posted today, is retroactive and being implemented before USCIS revises the I-129 Petition.  The fees apply to initial H-1B or L-1 employment – change of status and change of employer cases, in the same instances that require the Fraud Prevention Fee.  It is not required if an employer is filing to extend an H-1B or L-1 employee’s status.

What employers are subject to the new fee increase? The fee increase apply to employers who employ 50 or more employees in the USA with more than 50% of its employees in the USAS in H-1B or L (including L-1A, L-1B and L-2) nonimmigrant status. Petitioners meeting these criteria must submit the fee with an H-1B or L-1 petition filed.  It is noted that L-2 dependents of L-1 employees, are eligible for employment authorization documetns (EADs).  The USCIS recognized the difficulty for employers in adding such individuals into the count, but concluded that it is required under the law.  We are interpreting that this means that an employer who hires an L-2 dependent that has work authorization will be required to pay an additional fee of $2,250 to continue to employ them where an EAD is required for authorized employment.

USCIS will issue RFE’s: According to the August 19, 2010 public teleconference that USCIS held, cases filed without the new fee will not be rejected.  USCIS will issue Requests for Evidence (RFEs) on the cases that the new fee appears to be required.  Where USCIS does not any notation or attached evidence with the initial filing, it may issue an RFE to determine whether the petition is covered by the  Public Law. An RFE may be required even if such evidence is submitted, they advise, if questions arise.

Recommendations: USCIS encourages employers to include the additional fee as a separate check rather than adding this amount to the other filing fee checks, making it easy to simply return a check rather than reject an entire case filing for an incorrect filing fee.  Until such time as the form is revised, it has been recommended that the petitioner include a notation of whether the fee is required in bold capital letters at the top of the cover letter and, if it is required, pertinent documentation.

Issues: There are questions pertaining to L-1 petitions under the L-1 blanket program and how to work this out abroad at the US Consulates.  We will continue to keep you informed on this issue.

An interesting sidebar that came to light yesterday on the fee increase had to do with the fact that since it is common knowledge that the law targets Indian staffing agencies and consulting companies as well as medium to large IT employers, that it is probably a violation of the General Agreement on Trade and Services, an agreement that is vital to ensuring US companies are able to employ many of the 6,000,000 Americans working around the world.

Further, reported by Computerworld, the Department of State revealed this week that the U.S. is reviewing whether a law that increases some visa fees is compliant with World Trade Organization (WTO) rules and are also talking to Indian officials about the law and its implications.  India’s Commerce Secretary Rahul Khullar told reporters in Delhi on Tuesday that the visa fee hike is incompatible with the WTO.

We encourage you to sign up to receive our free information and join our worldwide readership.

::::::::::::::::::::::

Immigration Solutions provides US and global visa services to individuals and employers throughout the USA and abroad.  We specialize in business immigration and have a depth of experience in the IT, healthcare, arts, entertainment, and sports industries, amongst others.  Our services include complex business visas for investors, multinational managers, skilled professionals and outstanding individuals in science, business, education, athletics and entertainment.  We additionally provide employer compliance consulting services on proper I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification) auditing, training, and work with our clients to develop compliant immigration policies and procedures.  We offer these services, as well, to government contractors and advise on FAR E-Verify enrollment and compliance issues.

President Barack Obama on Friday signed a bill directing $600 million more to securing the U.S.-Mexico border, a modest election-year victory that underscores his failure so far to deliver an overhaul of immigration law from Congress.

Obama signed the bill Friday in a low-key Oval Office ceremony alongside Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano. There were cameras present, but no reporters. The action came a day after the Senate convened in special session during its summer recess to pass the bill.

“Look, only Congress can pass a bill,” Napolitano said. “The president can advocate. He can get them to the table, as he has in the Roosevelt Room upstairs. He can implore. He can provide ideas. He can agree to a framework, as he already has. He can give a major address that spells out what’s needed in a bill, but only Congress can pass a bill.”

The new law will pay for the hiring of 1,000 more Border Patrol agents to be deployed at critical areas, as well as more Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. It provides for new communications equipment and greater use of unmanned surveillance drones. The Justice Department gets more money to help catch drug dealers and human traffickers.

“Efforts to overhaul our broken immigration system have once again taken a back seat to appeasing anti-immigrant xenophobes, as Congress passed another dramatic escalation in border enforcement with very little evidence that past escalations have been effective,” said Margaret Moran, president of the League of United Latin American Citizens.

More on this

Obama’s Statement on Passing the Border Security Bill

USA Today

► Breaking News

• Judge Blocks AZ Law

A federal judge today blocked the most controversial parts of Arizona’s immigration law from taking effect, delivering a last-minute victory to opponents of the crackdown.  The judge also put on hold parts of the law that required immigrants to carry their papers at all times, and made it illegal for undocumented workers to solicit employment in public places.  We link here and here for more on the subject

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

NEWS BYTES FOR OUR ARTS, SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT CLIENTS:

• Immigration Solutions’ July Sports | Arts & Entertainment News

• Sports Teams and Celebrities Among those Facing Visa Refusals

• Iroquois Lacrosse Team Denied UK Visas

• James Cameron’s offer to help with BP Oil Spill turned down

• NYU  Music Technology Program
  

• US Reversal on Visa Denied to Colombian Journalist

and more

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

• Thinking of Applying for US Citizenship?

New Brochure:  http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Resources/Citizenship%20&%20Naturalization%20Based%20Resources/G-1151.pdf

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Immigration Solutions provides US and global visa services to individuals and employers throughout the USA and abroad.  We specialize in business immigration and have a depth of experience in the IT, healthcare, arts & entertainment sectors, amongst others.  Our services include complex business visas for investors, multinational managers, skilled professionals and outstanding individuals in science, business, education, athletics and entertainment.  We additionally provide employer compliance consulting services on proper I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification) auditing, training, and work with our clients to develop compliant immigration policies and procedures.

DHS finalized a regulation that provides greater flexibility for employers to electronically sign and store I-9 forms, which are used by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to verify employment eligibility-eliminating the need for paper filing and streamlining efforts to ensure a legal workforce nationwide.

Employers—who complete and retain the Form I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification)—may sign the form electronically and retain the form in an electronic format.

More in the final rule:

1)  DHS will allow competing paper and electronic systems:  This clarifies that an employer moving to an electronic system need not create digital images/data related to historical paper forms. However, from some employer’s perspective monitoring two distinct verification systems for compliance may be too difficult a logistical challenge. These particular employers have elected to go entirely electronic to take advantage of the ability to monitor compliance and provide for electronic reminders. We strongly recommend that employers should continue to approach converting paper I-9s to electronic images very carefully, first discussing the benefits as well as the concerns (in particular audit related and privilege issues) with their immigration attorneys.

2)  The final rule reaffirms that employers will not be required to use a specific technology to complete and store I-9 information, so long as the system they use ensures accessibility and they are able to produce a reasonable facsimile or copy of the I-9.

3)  The final rule will also relax the audit trail requirement from the interim rule so that employers no longer have to keep records of when the information is accessed or viewed. Instead, an audit trail will only need to include information on the the initial completion and any subsequent modification to the I-9.

4)  The final rule will also relax the interim rule’s requirement to provide a transaction record to the employee at the time the electronic I-9 is created. Under the rule to be published tomorrow, the employer may “provide or transmit a confirmation of the transaction only if an employee requests it . . . within a reasonable period of time.” Finally, the final rule will remove the mandate that the electronic storage system be searchable “by any data element,” requiring only an indexing system that “permits the identification and retrieval for viewing or reproducing of relevant documents and records maintained in an electronic storage system.”

5) Indexing does not require all fields:   The final rule identifies that not all of the “data element(s)” must be searchable, but that the system must provide a sense of “searchability” consistent with the amended 8 CFR Sec. 274a.2(e)(6).

More information about I-9 forms and Employment Eligibility Verification is available on the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services website at www.uscis.gov/I-9.

For further guidance on the electronic signing and storage of the I-9, and the changes to the current regulations to assist businesses in complying with the requirements of the law, please visit www.ice.gov or view the Federal Register at www.gpoaccess.gov.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

What can Immigration Solution do for you?

Our firm’s years of experience and knowledge with employer compliance and worksite enforcement issues can assist your business in offsetting the extent of sanctions and other ICE enforcement threats.  Because of this, employer compliance is becoming more complex and enforcement (investigations and audits) is increasing.

In order to effectively deal with these issues and avoid the very severe consequences for non-compliance, employers must take the time to develop a strategy and be prepared in advance with an Immigration Compliance Program. Immigration Solutions has created a package of services and solutions to assist you with your compliance procedures that can be tailored to your specific needs and concerns.  Contact our office should you wish to discuss your audit, training and compliance needs.

The Obama administration has been holding behind-the-scenes talks to determine whether the Department of Homeland Security can unilaterally grant legal status on a mass basis to illegal immigrants, a former Bush administration official who spoke with at least three people involved in those talks told FoxNews.com on 6/21/10.

The issue was raised publicly by eight Republican senators who wrote to the White House last week to complain that they had heard the administration was readying a “Plan B” in case a comprehensive immigration reform bill cannot win enough support to clear Congress.

The White House has neither confirmed or denied this claim.  It’s unclear what section of the illegal immigrant population such a move would target. But the former Bush official said the discussions are real.

“The administration at the very minimum is studying legal ways to legalize people without having to go through any congressional debate about it,” the source said, calling the senators’ claim credible. “Whether somebody pulls the trigger on that, that’s another issue.”

The senators — Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa; Orrin Hatch, R-Utah; David Vitter, R-La.; Jim Bunning, R-Ky.; Saxby Chambliss, Ga.; Johnny Isakson, R-Ga.; and James Inhofe, R-Okla  — claimed in their letter that the administration was looking at extending what is known as deferred action or parole to millions of illegal aliens in the United States.

For more on this story

ICE has filed a 60-day notice for a new information collection application with the OMB (Office of Management and Budget) for their IMAGE Program (ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers) that is the education component of the Office of Investigations (OI) Worksite Enforcement program.  The Notice is available here.  Comments will be accepted for 60 days until August 10, 2010, and should be sent to the person named in the Notice.

In an article published on ILW.com on the subject, the author states:

In July of 2006, ICE announced two measures billed as “voluntary partnerships with the government.” The first is a list of what the agency considers to be “Best Hiring Practices.” The second is a voluntary program entitled the “ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers,” also referred to as IMAGE , which it has been working on since at least July of 2005. The government is actively promoting these programs to employers.

What are considered Best Hiring practices?

As part of the ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers, the (IMAGE) program, DHS recommends the following “best hiring practices” as follows:

• Use E-Verify to verify the employment eligibility of all new hires.
• Use the Social Security Number Verification Service (SSNVS) and make a good-faith effort to correct and verify the names and Social Security numbers of the current workforce.
• Establish a written hiring and employment eligibility verification policy (I-9 policy)
• Establish an internal compliance and training program related to the hiring and employment verification process, including completion of the I-9 form, how to detect the fraudulent use of documents in the verification process, and how to use E-Verify and SSNVS.  Require the I-9 and E-Verify process to be conducted only by an individual who has received appropriate training, and include a secondary review as part of each employee’s verification “to minimize the potential for a single individual to subvert the process.”
• Arrange for annual I-9 audits by an external auditing firm or a trained employee not otherwise involved in the I-9 process.
• Establish a procedure to report to ICE credible information of suspected criminal misconduct in the employment eligibility verification process.
• Establish a program to assess subcontractors’ compliance with employment eligibility verification requirements. Encourage contractors to incorporate IMAGE Best Practices and when practicable incorporate the verification requirements in subcontractor agreements.
• Establish a protocol for responding to letters received from federal and state government agencies indicating that there is a discrepancy between the agency’s information and the information provided by the employer or employee (for example, “no-match” letters received from the Social Security Administration).
• Establish a tip line mechanism (e.g., inbox, e-mail) for employees to report activity relating to the employment of unauthorized workers, and a protocol for responding to employee tips.
• Establish and maintain appropriate policies, practices, and safeguards against use of the verification process for unlawful discrimination, and to ensure that U.S. citizens and authorized workers do not face discrimination with respect to hiring, firing, or recruitment or referral for a fee because of citizenship status or national origin.
• Maintain copies of any documents accepted as proof of identity and/or employment authorization for all new hires.

Note:  It is important to notice that some of these points listed above have critical content.  We link to the ILW.com excellent analysis of Best Practices and the IMAGE program for employers to carefully consider prior to enrolling in these programs.

Should you require further assistance or consultation regarding these programs, please contact our office.

As reported by the Legal Action Center (AILA).  Broadgate et al. v. USCIS et al., No. 1:10cv00941 (D.C.D. filed June 8, 2010)

Three employers (software developers and IT services firms) and two not-for-profit trade associations are challenging the Neufeld memo in federal district court. The plaintiffs allege that USCIS issued the memo in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act’s notice and comment requirements; that USCIS failed to perform a Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis; that the memo is inconsistent with existing regulations addressing the employee-employer relationship and the term “contractor” and conflicts with the plain language of the INA; and that it is arbitrary and capricious. Plaintiffs ask the court to preliminarily and permanently enjoin USCIS from implementing the memo.

AILA sent a detailed letter to USCIS Chief Council, Roxana Bacon, in which it expressed concern about the substance of the January 8, 2010 H-1B memo and noted that its issuance was in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act’s notice and comment requirements. The letter primarily focuses on recent USCIS decisions that unlawfully find that individuals with controlling or substantial interests in a petitioning U.S. company or its foreign parent company cannot — in most cases — be a beneficiary of a nonimmigrant or immigrant employment-based petition.

We will continue to keep you posted on this topic.

::::::::

USCIS Proposes Fee Increase

USCIS has published a Proposed Rule in the Federal Register to increase immigration fees.  The cost of applying for a green card will increase from $930 to $985.  The application fee for a family petition (I-130) will be $420, up from $355.  The cost of an I-140 employment-based petition will rise over $100 and premium processing fees will increase by 22.5%.  The application for employment authorization would increase to $380 from $340. A separate fee for fingerprints and other biometrics with many applications would increase to $85 from $80.  Among several new fees, officials said, will be a $6,230 charge for foreigners proposing to invest $500,000 or more in businesses to create jobs in the United States.

The NY Times reports that Alejandro Mayorkas, director of  USCIS, said the fee increase was necessary because declining applications for documents in the past two years had lowered revenues and left his agency — which is 90% financed by fees — with a budget shortfall of about $200 million for the coming fiscal year.

The increases come as Congress has put off immigration legislation and an Arizona law that makes it a state crime to be in the country illegally goes into effect July 29.

The timing makes Clarissa Martinez wonder what message the fee increases sends to immigrants trying to take a legal path into the country.  “It begs the question of Congress: If we want these people to take these steps, we have to make sure that we’re not pricing them out of their reach,” said Martinez, director of immigration and national campaigns for the National Council of La Raza, a Hispanic civil rights group.

::::::::

If you’d like to stay in touch with our office and sign up for our information, blog and news, you can do so here. You can follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn here.